The present study uses an interpersonal relationships measure (Relationship Rating Form [RRF], Fraley & Davis, 1997) to assess both imagined intimacy with a favorite media figure and real intimacy with close others among 173 undergraduates. We examine how relational tendencies (attachment style, need to belong) and relationship status (single or partnered) interact to predict degree of imagined intimacy with same and opposite gender media figures. Results indicate that intimacy reported with a same gender friend is positively correlated with imagined intimacy for a same gender media figure. However, a compensatory pattern emerged with romantic relationships: single individuals reported greater imagined intimacy with opposite gender media figures than those in a relationship. Attachment anxiety and the need to belong (NTB) were positively predictive of imagined intimacy with opposite gender media figures for single individuals only. Social psychological motivations for media attachments are discussed.
Auter, P.J., & Palmgreen, P. ( 2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The Audience-Persona Interaction Scale. Communication Research Reports, 17, 79-89.
3.
Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. ( 1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin , 117, 497-529.
4.
Brennan, K.A., Clark, C.L., & Shaver, P.R. ( 1998). Self report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford.
5.
Caughey, J. ( 1984). Imaginary social worlds: A cultural approach. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
6.
Cohen, J. ( 1997). Parasocial relations and romantic attraction: Gender and dating status differences. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 516-529.
7.
Cole, T., & Leets, L. ( 1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 495-511.
8.
Derrick, J.L., Gabriel, S., & Tippin, B. ( 2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15, 261-280.
9.
Engle, Y., & Kasser, T. ( 2005). Why do adolescent girls idolize male celebrities? Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 263-283.
10.
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19, 114-120.
11.
Fraley, R.F., & Davis, K.E. ( 1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships , 4, 131-144.
12.
Gardner, C.L., Pickett, M., & Knowles, M. ( 2005). Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227-242). New York: Psychology Press.
13.
Giles, D. ( 2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279-305.
14.
Giles, D.C., & Maltby, J. ( 2004). The role of media in adolescent development: Relations between autonomy, attachment, and interest in celebrities. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 813-822.
15.
Greenwood, D.N. ( 2009). Idealized TV friends and young women’s body concerns . Body Image, 6, 97-104.
16.
Greenwood, D.N. ( 2010). Of sad men and dark comedies: Mood and gender effects on entertainment media preferences. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 232-249.
17.
Greenwood, D.N., & Long, C.R. ( 2009). Psychological predictors of media involvement: Solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research , 36, 637-654.
18.
Greenwood, D., Pietromonaco, P.R., & Long, C.R. ( 2008).Young women’s attachment style and interpersonal engagement with female TV stars. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 387-407.
19.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. ( 1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
20.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R.R. ( 1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations of intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.
21.
Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. ( 2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Knobloch, S., & Zillmann, D. ( 2003). The appeal of love themes in popular music. Psychological Reports, 93, 653-658.
23.
Leary, M.R., Kelly, K.M., Cottrell, C.A., & Schreindorfer, L.S. (2007). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript , Duke University, Durham, NC.
24.
McCutcheon, L.E., & Maltby, J. ( 2002). Personality attributions about individuals high and low in the tendency to worship celebrities. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7, 325-339.
25.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. ( 2004). Security-based self-representations in adulthood: Contents and processes. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 159-195). New York: Guilford.
26.
Pietromonaco, P.R., & Barrett, L.F. ( 2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4, 155-175.
27.
Rubin, A., Perse, E., & Powell, R. ( 1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155-180.
28.
Wang, Q., Fink, E.L., & Cai, D.A. ( 2008). Loneliness, gender, and parasocial interaction: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Quarterly, 56, 87-109.
