Narratives represent a powerful and ubiquitous form of communication that influence what individuals believe about the world. While the field of narrative persuasion investigates how narratives affect attitudes and behaviors, it rarely considers structural variables discussed in the field of discourse psychology. This study examines the utility of bridging these fields by testing the persuasive influence of novel science information relative to the internal causal structure of a narrative. Results suggest that information placed at causal locations of a narrative result in greater acceptance of information than the same information placed at noncausal locations within the same narrative. These findings suggest that the within-narrative variable of causality can influence the persuasive impact of information inserted into a narrative. In response, this study identifies a significant source of variance that has thus far been overlooked in studies of narrative persuasion.
Appel, M. ( 2008). Fictional narratives cultivate just-world beliefs. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 62-83.
2.
Appel, M., & Richter, T. ( 2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113-134.
3.
Baesler, E.J., & Burgoon, J.K. ( 1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582-602.
4.
Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
5.
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R.W. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58, 508-529.
Braverman, J. ( 2008). Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages: The moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research, 35, 666-694.
8.
Bridgman, T., & Barry, D. ( 2002). Regulation is evil: An application of narrative policy analysis to regulatory debate in New Zealand. Policy Sciences , 35, 141-161.
9.
Britt, M.A., Perfetti, C.A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J. ( 1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209-233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Brock, T.C., Strange, J.J., & Green, M.C. ( 2002). Power beyond reckoning: An introduction to narrative impact. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 1-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Brodie, M., Foehr, U., Rideout, V., Baer, N., Miller, C., & Flournoy, R., et al. (2001). Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Affairs, 20, 192-199.
12.
Brosius, H.B., & Bathelt, A. ( 1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications . Communication Research, 21(1), 48-78.
13.
Bruner, J. ( 1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Busselle, R.W. ( 2001). Television exposure, perceived realism, and exemplar accessibility in the social judgment process. Media Psychology , 3(1), 43-67.
15.
Busselle, R.W., & Bilandzic, H. ( 2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255-280.
16.
Busselle, R.W., & Greenberg, B.S. (2000). The nature of television realism judgments: A reevaluation of their conceptualization and measurement . Mass Communication and Society, 3, 249-268.
17.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. ( 1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 673-675.
18.
Chang, C.C. ( 2009). "Being hooked" by editorial content: The implications for processing narrative advertising. Journal of Advertising , 38(1), 21-33.
19.
Davin, S. ( 2003). Healthy viewing: The reception of medical narratives . Sociology of Health & Illness, 25, 662-679.
20.
de Wit, J.B.F., Das, E., & Vet, R. ( 2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 27(1), 110-115.
21.
Dillard, J.P., Plotnick, C.A., Godbold, L.C., Freimuth, V.S., & Edgar, T. ( 1996). The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23(1), 44-72.
22.
Dudo, A., Dahlstrom, M., & Brossard, D. ( 2007). Reporting a potential pandemic: A risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in U.S. newspapers. Science Communication , 28, 429-454.
23.
Durkin, S., & Wakefield, M. ( 2008). Interrupting a narrative transportation experience: Program placement effects on responses to antismoking advertising. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 667-680.
24.
Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R.J. ( 2006). Readers’ experiences of characters’ goals and actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 32, 1322-1329.
25.
Festinger, L. ( 1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
Fletcher, C.R., & Bloom, C.P. ( 1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235-244.
27.
Fletcher, C.R., Hummel, J.E., & Marsolek, C.J. (1990). Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 16, 233-240.
28.
Gerbner, G. ( 1987). Science on television: How it affects public conceptions . Issues in Science and Technology, 3, 109-115.
29.
Gerrig, R.J. ( 1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
Graesser, A.C., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. ( 2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange , & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229-262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. ( 1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension . Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
32.
Green, M.C. ( 2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247-266.
33.
Green, M.C. ( 2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56, S163-S183. Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. ( 2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
34.
Green, M.C., Brock, T.C., & Kaufman, G.E. ( 2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311-327.
35.
Green, M.C., Garst, J., Brock, T.C., & Chung, S. ( 2006). Fact versus fiction labeling: Persuasion parity despite heightened scrutiny of fact. Media Psychology, 8, 267-285.
36.
Guttman, N., Gesser-Edelsburg, A., & Israelashvili, M. (2008). The paradox of realism and "Authenticity" in entertainment-education: A study of adolescents’ views about anti-drug abuse dramas. Health Communication, 23(2), 128-141.
37.
Judd, C.M., Kenny, D.A., & McClelland, G.H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 115-134.
38.
Kintsch, W. ( 1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Kreiswirth, M. ( 1992). Trusting the tale: The narrativist turn in the human sciences. New Literary History, 23, 629-657.
40.
Kreiswirth, M. ( 2000). Merely telling stories? Narrative and knowledge in the human sciences. Poetics Today, 21, 293-318.
41.
Kreuter, M.W., Green, M.C., Cappella, J.N., Slater, M.D., Wise, M.E., & Storey, D., et al. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 221-235.
42.
Laubscher, N.F. ( 1961). On stabilizing the binomial and negative binomial variances . Journal of American Statistical Association, 56, 143-150.
43.
Mackie, J.L. ( 1980). The cement of the universe. Oxford , UK: Clarendon.
44.
Magliano, J.P. ( 1999). Revealing inference processes during text comprehension . In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 55-75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Marsh, E.J., Meade, M.L., & Roediger, H.L. (2003). Learning facts from fiction . Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 519-536.
46.
Mazor, K.M., Baril, J., Dugan, E., Spencer, F., Burgwinkle, P., & Gurwitz, J.H. ( 2007). Patient education about anticoagulant medication: Is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective? Patient Education and Counseling, 69, 145-157.
47.
McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. ( 1999). Telling stories about global climate change-Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research , 26(1), 30-57.
48.
Morrow, D.G., Bower, G.H., & Greenspan, S.L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language , 28, 292-312.
49.
Moyer-Guse, E. ( 2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407-425.
50.
Oatley, K. ( 2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange , & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39-70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. O’Keefe, D.J. (2002 ). Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Prentice, D.A., Gerrig, R.J., & Bailis, D.S. ( 1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 416-420.
52.
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R. ( 1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. Schank, & R. Abelson (Eds.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1-85). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Schank, R.C., & Berman, T.B. ( 2002). The persuasive role of stories in knowledge and action . In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 287-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Simon, L., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. ( 1995). Trivialization-The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
55.
Singhal, A., & Rogers, E.M. ( 2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12(2), 117-135.
56.
Slater, M.D. ( 1990). Processing social information in messages: Social groups familiarity, fiction versus nonfiction, and subsequent beliefs. Communication Research, 17, 327-343.
57.
Slater, M.D. ( 2002). Entertainment and education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 157-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
Slater, M.D., Buller, D.B., Waters, E., Archibeque, M., & LeBlanc, M. ( 2003). A test of conversational and testimonial messages versus didactic presentations of nutrition information. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 35, 255-259.
59.
Slater, M.D., & Rouner, D. ( 2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory , 12, 173-191.
60.
Slater, M.D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. ( 2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication , 56, 235-252.
61.
Southwell, B.G., & Torres, A. ( 2006). Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation. Communication Monographs, 73, 334-350.
62.
Strange, J.J. ( 2002). How fictional tales wag real-world beliefs. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange , & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 263-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
Sundermeier, B.A., van den Broek, P., & Zwaan, R.A. ( 2005). Causal coherence and the availability of locations and objects during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition , 33, 462-470.
64.
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L.L. ( 1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.
65.
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. ( 1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through online inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
66.
van den Broek, P., & Gustafson, M. ( 1999). Comprehension and memory for texts: Three generations of reading research. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 15-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
van den Broek, P., Lorch, E.P., & Thurlow, R. ( 1996). Children’s and adults’ memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories, and hierarchical level. Child Development, 67, 3010-3028.
68.
Wheeler, S.C., Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. ( 1999). Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(1), 136-141.
69.
Whittier, D.K., Kennedy, M.G., St Lawrence, J.S., Seeley, S., & Beck, V. ( 2005). Embedding health messages into entertainment television: Effect on gay men’s response to a syphilis outbreak. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 251-259.
70.
Winterbottom, A., Bekker, H.L., Conner, M., & Mooney, A. ( 2008). Does narrative information bias individual’s decision making? A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine , 67, 2079-2088.
71.
Wise, M., Han, J.Y., Shaw, B., McTavish, F., & Gustafson, D.H. (2008). Effects of using online narrative and didactic information on healthcare participation for breast cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 70, 348-356.
72.
Witte, K., & Allen, M. ( 2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591-615.
73.
Yaros, R.A. ( 2006). Is it the medium or the message? Structuring complex news to enhance engagement and situational understanding by nonexperts. Communication Research, 33, 285-309.
74.
Yoder, P.S., Hornik, R., & Chirwa, B.C. ( 1996). Evaluating the program effects of a radio drama about AIDS in Zambia. Studies in Family Planning, 27, 188-203.
75.
Zwaan, R.A. ( 1999). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 93-110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76.
Zwaan, R.A., Langston, M.C., & Graesser, A.C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
