This study explores the relationships between discussion networks and the development of extreme attitudes toward stem cell research during the 2004 presidential election. The authors test competing theoretical models that address discrepancies in previous attitude polarization research—whether interpersonal discussion leads to attitude extremity or extremity leads to discussion, within the deliberating American public. Using data from a nationwide mail panel survey carried out between 2002 and 2005, the authors explore within-wave and between-wave causal paths, revealing patterns difficult to discern in cross-sectional survey or lab experimental designs. Our findings show that political talk plays a substantial role in shaping and polarizing attitudes on stem cell research, with discussion in networks composed of like-minded others leading directly to the development of extreme attitudes.
Abelson, R.P. (1995). Attitude extremity. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 25-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
3.
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.
4.
Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink & polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
5.
Asch, S.E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
6.
Baldassare, M., & Katz, C. (1996). Measures of attitude strength as predictors of willingness to speak to the media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 147-158.
7.
Baron, R.S., Hoppe, S.I., Kao, C.F., Brunsman, B., Linneweh, B., & Rogers, D. (1996). Social corroboration and opinion extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 537-560.
8.
Bartels, L.M. (1999). Panel effects in the American National Election Studies. Political Analysis, 8(1), 1-20.
9.
Bem, D.J., & McConnell, H.K. (1970). Testing self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of pre-manipulation attitudes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 23-31.
10.
Besley, J.C., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology. Science Communication, 26(4), 347-367.
11.
Bizer, G.Y., & Krosnick, J.A. (2001). Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 566-586.
12.
Bollen, K.A. (1987). Structural equation models with latent variables . New York: John Wiley.
13.
Brauer, M., Gliner, M.D., & Judd, C.M. (1995). The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1014-1029.
14.
Brossard, D., & Nisbet, M.C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low-information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24-52.
15.
Brown, J. (1986). The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
16.
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 315-442.
17.
Cho, J.H. (2005). Media, interpersonal discussion, and electoral choice. Communication Research, 32(3), 295-322.
18.
Converse, P.E. (2000). Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 331-353.
19.
Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L., & Jacobs, L.R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
20.
Downing, J.W., Judd, C.M., & Brauer, M. (1992). Effects of repeated expressions on attitude extremity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 17-29.
21.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22.
Eisinger, R., & Mills, J. (1968). Perception of the sincerity and competence of a communicator as a function of the extremity of his position. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(2), 224-232.
23.
Eveland, W.P., Hayes, A.F., Shah, D.V., & Kwak, N. (2005). Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model comparison approach using panel data. Political Communication, 22(4), 423-446.
Fiorina, M.P., & Levendusky, M.S. (2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America's polarized politics (Vol. 1, pp. 49-71). Baltimore: Brookings Institution Press.
26.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59-74.
27.
Friedkin, N.E. (1999). Choice shift and group polarization. American Sociological Review, 64(6), 856-875.
28.
Galston, W.A., & Nivola, P.S. (2006). Delineating the problem. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America's polarized politics (Vol. 1, pp. 1-43). Baltimore: Brookings Institution Press.
29.
Gross, S.R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Hardy, B.W., & Scheufele, D.A. (2005). Examining differential gains from Internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 71-84.
31.
Hayes, A.F., Glynn, C.J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Willingness to self-censor: A construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 298-323.
32.
Hayes, A.F., Scheufele, D.A., & Huge, M.E. (2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259-283.
33.
Hoffman, L.H., Glynn, C.J., Huge, M.E., Sietman, R.B., & Thomson, T. (2007). The role of communication in public opinion processes: Understanding the impacts of intrapersonal, media, and social filters. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(3), 287-312.
34.
Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1985). Assumed similarity and opinion certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 890-898.
35.
Hovland, C.L. (1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist , 14(1), 8-17.
36.
Jöreskog, K.G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Judd, C.M., & Brauer, M. (1995). Repetition and evaluative extremity. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 43-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Kendall, P.L., & Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1950). Problems of survey analysis . In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of "The American Soldier" (pp. 148-154). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
40.
Kim, J., Wyatt, R.O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication , 16(4), 361-385.
41.
Krosnick, J.A., Boninger, D.S., Chuang, Y.C., Berent, M.K., & Carnot, C.G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1132-1151.
42.
Krosnick, J.A., & Petty, R.E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedent and consequences (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Lasorsa, D.L. (1991). Political outspokenness: Factors working against the spiral of silence. Journalism Quarterly, 68(1-2), 131-140.
44.
Lazarsfeld, P.M., Berelson, B.R., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce.
45.
McLeod, D.M., Kosicki, G.M., & McLeod, J.M. (2002). Resurveying the boundaries of political communication effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 215-267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Miller, N., Gross, S.R., & Holtz, R. (1991). Social projection and attitudinal certainty. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 177-209). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
48.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125-135.
49.
Mutz, D.C. (1989). The influence of perceptions of media influence: Third person effects and the public expression of opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1(1), 3-23.
50.
Mutz, D.C. (2002a). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science , 46(4), 838-855.
51.
Mutz, D.C. (2002b). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111-126.
52.
Newcomb, T.M. (1943). Personality and social change. New York: Dryden Press.
53.
Nisbet, M.C., Scheufele, D.A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B.V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology . Communication Research, 29(5), 584-608.
54.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion . Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43-51.
55.
Oskamp, S. (1977). Attitudes and opinions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56.
Ostrom, T.M., & Upshaw, H.S. (1968). Psychological perspective and attitude change . In A. C. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 217-242). New York: Academic Press.
57.
Pan, Z.D., Shen, L.J., Paek, H.J., & Sun, Y. (2006). Mobilizing political talk in a presidential campaign: An examination of campaign effects in a deliberative framework. Communication Research, 33(5), 315-345.
58.
Putnam, R.D., & Yonish, S. (1999, May). How important are random samples? Some surprising new evidence. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Pete Beach, Florida.
59.
Ricateau, P. (1971). Processus de catégorisation d'autrui et les mécanismes d'influence. Bulletin de Psychologie, 24, 909-919.
60.
Sanders, G.S., & Baron, R.S. (1977). Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 303-314.
61.
Scheufele, D.A. (2000). Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 727-743.
62.
Scheufele, D.A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 3-28.
63.
Schudson, M. (1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy . Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14(4), 297-309.
64.
Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Martin Kessler Books .
65.
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press.
66.
Shah, D.V., & Scheufele, D.A. (2006). Explicating opinion leadership: Nonpolitical dispositions, information consumption, and civic participation . Political Communication, 23(1), 1-22.
67.
Skitka, L.J., Bauman, C.W., & Sargis, E.G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895-917.
68.
Sotirovic, M. (2001). Effects of media use on complexity and extremity of attitudes toward the death penalty and prisoners' rehabilitation. Media Psychology, 3(1), 1-24.
69.
Sunstein, C.R. (2000). Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes . Yale Law Journal, 110(1), 71-119.
70.
Tannenbaum, P.H. (1956). Initial attitude toward source and concept as factors in attitude change through communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(2), 413-425.
71.
Tesser, A., & Conlee, M.C. (1975). Some effects of time and thought on attitude polarization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 262-270.
72.
Thompson, M.M., & Zanna, M.P. (1995). The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63(2), 259-288.
73.
Thompson, M.M., Zanna, M.P., & Griffin, D.W. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence . In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
75.
Visser, P.S., Krosnick, J.A., & Simmons, J.P. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 118-141.
76.
Wyatt, R.O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 71-92.
77.
Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78.
Zhao, X.S., & Chaffee, S.H. (1995). Campaign advertisements versus television-news as sources of political issue information. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(1), 41-65.
