The present research revisits citizen competence in the changing political and information environment, considering citizens as pluralistic issue publics. Using 2000 and 2004 American National Election Study data, Study 1 explores the conceptual premises of issue publics and the impact of the Web on domain-specific knowledge and extremity. Study 2 uses a unique data set combining an innovative direct measure of users' Web behavior records with survey responses from those users in the context of the 2004 U.S. general election. The results shed light on issue publics' information acquisition on the Web. This complementary data set provides a more complete picture of how issue publics develop unique patterns of information acquisition and make voting decisions. The findings indicate that issue publics enhanced their domain-specific knowledge by using information highly selectively. In addition, their selective information use contributed to increases in extremity and issue voting patterns. Implications for the functioning of democracy are discussed.
Abramowitz, A.I. (1995). It's abortion, stupid: Policy voting in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 57, 176-186.
2.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly , 24, 665-694.
3.
Almond, G. (1950). The American people and foreign policy. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
4.
Althaus, S.L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda-setting and the "new" news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29, 180-207.
5.
Alvarez, R.M., & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers: Values, information, and American public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Atkin, C.K. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking . In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for communication research (pp. 205-242). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Berent, M.K., & Krosnick, J.A. (1995). The relation between political attitudes importance and knowledge structure. In M. Lodge & K. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 91-110). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Boninger, D.S., Krosnick, J.A., Berent, M.K., & Fabrigar, L.R. (1995). The causes and consequences of attitude importance. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 159-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Chaffee, S.H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107.
10.
Converse, P.E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. A. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
11.
Converse, P.E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: The continuation of dialogue. In T. Edward (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168-189). Reading, MA: Addition-Wesley.
12.
Cook, E.A., Jelen, T.G., & Wilcox, C. (1993). Issue voting in gubernatorial elections: Abortion and post-Webster politics. Journal of Politics, 56, 187-199.
13.
Dalrymple, K.E., & Scheufele, D.A. (2007). Finally informing the electorate? How the Internet got people thinking about presidential politics in 2004. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics , 12, 96-111.
14.
Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Dillon, R.F., & Tombaugh, J.W. (1982). Where the world is heading: Psychological research on videotex. Behavioral Research, Methods, & Instrumentation, 14, 191-197.
17.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Eveland W.P., Jr., Cortese, J., Park, H., & Dunwoody, S. (2004). How Web site organization influences free recall, factual knowledge, and knowledge structure density. Human Communication Research, 30, 208-233.
19.
Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Dunwoody, S. (2000). Examining information processing on the World Wide Web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology, 2, 219-244.
20.
Eveland, W.P., Jr., Marton, K., & Seo, M. (2004). Moving beyond "just the facts": The influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge. Communication Research, 31, 82-108.
21.
Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Fiorina, M.P. (2002). Parties and partisanship: A 40-year retrospective . Political Behavior, 24, 93-115.
23.
Fournier, P., Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Issue importance and performance voting. Political Behavior, 25, 51-67.
24.
Fredin, E.S. (1997). Rethinking the news story for the Internet: Hyperstory prototypes and a model of the user. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 163, 1-47.
25.
Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. New York : Cambridge University Press.
26.
Graber, D.A. (1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. New York: Longman.
27.
Graber, D.A. (1994). Why voters fail information tests: Can the hurdles be overcome? Political Communication, 11, 331-346.
28.
Hutchings, V.L. (2003). Public opinion and democratic accountability: How citizens learn about politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Iyengar, S. (1986, June). Analysis of ANES pilot study data. Paper presented at National Election Study Pilot Study Conference , Ann Arbor, MI.
30.
Iyengar, S. (1990). Shortcuts to political knowledge: The role of selective attention and accessibility. In J. A. Ferejon, & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 160-185). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
31.
Johnson, T.J., & Kaye, B.K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 865-879.
32.
Jones, D.A. (2002). The polarizing effect of new media messages. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 158-174.
33.
Katz, E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 22-33.
34.
Krosnick, J.A. (1990). Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Political Behavior , 12, 59-92.
35.
Krosnick, J.A., & Berent, M.K. (1993). Comparisons of party identification and policy preferences: The impact of survey question format. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 941-964.
36.
Krosnick, J.A., Berent, M.K., & Boninger, D.S. (1994). Pockets of responsibility in the American electorate: Findings of a research program on attitude importance . Political Communication, 11, 391-411.
37.
Krosnick, J.A., & Telhami, S. (1995). Public attitudes toward Israel: A study of the attentive and issue publics. International Studies Quarterly , 39, 535-554.
38.
Kuklinski, J.H., & Quirk, P. (2001). Conceptual foundations of citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 285-311.
39.
Lavine, H. (2001). The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science , 45, 915-929.
40.
Lavine, H., Borgida, E., & Sullivan, J.L. (2000). On the relationship between attitude involvement and attitude accessibility: Toward a cognitive-motivational model of political information processing. Political Psychology , 21, 81-106.
41.
Layman, G.C., & Carsey, T.M. (2002). Party polarization and "conflict extension" in theAmerican electorate. American Journal of Political Science , 46, 786-802.
42.
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63-76.
43.
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M.D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Miller, J.D. (1983). The American people and science policy: The role of public attitudes in the policy process. New York: Pergamon.
45.
Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.
46.
Noll, A.M. (1985). Videotex: Anatomy of a failure. Information and Management, 9, 99-109.
47.
Page, B.I., & Shapiro, R.Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trend in American's policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A.M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.
49.
Patterson, T.E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Knopf.
50.
Pavlik, J.V. (1999). New media and news: Implications for the future of journalism. New Media & Society, 1, 54-59.
51.
Pavlik, J.V. (2001). Journalism and new media. New York: Columbia University Press.
52.
Petty, R.E., & Krosnick, J.A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Popkin, S.L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Price, V. (1992). Public opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55.
Price, V., David, C., Goldthorpe, B., Roth, M.M., & Cappella, J.N. (2006). Locating the issue public: The multi-dimensional nature of engagement with health care reform. Political Behavior, 28, 33-63.
56.
Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133-164.
57.
Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577-592.
58.
Riggle, E.D., Ottati, V.C., Wyer, R.S. Jr., Kuklinski, J., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Bases on political judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information. Political Behavior, 14, 67-87.
59.
Scheufele, D.A., & Nisbet, M.C. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics , 7, 55-76.
60.
Schuman, H., Ludwig, J., & Krosnick, J.A. (1986). The perceived threat of nuclear war, salience, and open questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 519-536.
61.
Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research , 32, 531-565.
62.
Shah, D.V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R.L. (2001). "Connecting" and "disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162.
63.
Sunstein, C.R. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 175-195.
64.
Tewksbury, D. (2003). What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet. Journal of Communication , 53, 694-710.
65.
Tewksbury, D. (2006). Exposure to the newer media in a presidential primary campaign. Political Communication, 23, 313-332.
66.
Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S.L. (2000). Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 457-479.
67.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
Webster, J.G., & Phalen, P.F. (1997). The mass audience: Rediscovering the dominant mode . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
69.
Zaller, J.R. (1986, June). Analysis of information items in the 1985 NES pilot study. Paper presented at National Election Study Pilot Study Conference, Ann Arbor, MI.
70.
Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions means revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579-618.
