This study examines the role of agenda setting in affecting voter turnout using panel data of adolescents in Arizona, Florida, and Colorado from 2002 and 2004. Specifically, a model is developed probing the multiple influences of interactive civic instruction, media attention, and discussion on the following sequence of outcomes: perceived issue importance, opinion strength, political ideology, and finally voter turnout. The results suggest that agenda setting serves as a critical intrinsic process in political socialization contributing to the crystallization of political predispositions, which lead to electoral participation. The implications of the findings are discussed.
Anand, S., & Krosnick, J. (2003). The impact of attitudes toward foreign policy goals on public preferences among presidential candidates: A study of issue publics and the attentive public in the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33, 31-41.
2.
Asher, H. (1983). Voting behavior research in the 1980s: An examination of some old and new problem areas. In A. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 339-388). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association .
3.
Atkin, C. (1972). Anticipated communication and mass media information-seeking . Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 189-199.
4.
Atkin, C., & Gantz, W. (1978). Television news and political socialization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 183-198.
5.
Bennett, S.E. (2000). Political apathy and avoidance of news media among Generations X and Y: America's continuing problem. In S. Mann & J. J. Patrick (Eds.), Education for civic engagement in democracy: Service learning and other practices (pp. 1-181). Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies /Science Education.
6.
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
7.
Blood, D.J., & Phillips, P.C.B. (1997). Economic headline news on the agenda: New approaches to understanding cause and effects. In M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 97-113). Mahwah , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9.
Brown, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445-455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Butler, D., & Stokes, D. (1974). Political change in Britain (2nd ed.). London: McMillan.
11.
Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York : John Wiley.
13.
Cassel, C. (1982). Predicting party identification, 1956-80: Who are the Republicans and who are the Democrats? Political Behavior , 4, 265-282.
14.
Chaffee, S.H., McLeod, J., & Wackman, D. (1973). Family communication patterns and adolescent political participation. In J. Dennis (Ed.), Socialization to politics: A reader (pp. 349-364). New York: John Wiley.
15.
Chaffee, S.H., Morduchowicz, R., & Galperin, H. (1997). Education for democracy in Argentina: Effects of a newspaper-in-school program. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9, 313-335.
16.
Chaffee, S.H., & Roser, C. (1986). Involvement and the consistency of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Communication Research, 13, 373-399.
Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Easton, D. (1968). The theoretical relevance of political socialization . The Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1, 125-146.
20.
Eveland, W., McLeod, J., & Horowitz, E. (1998). Communication and age in childhood political socialization: An interactive model of political development. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 699-718.
21.
Franklin, C. (1984). Issue preferences, socialization, and the evolution of party identification. American Journal of Political Science , 28, 459-478.
22.
Ghanem, S.I., & Wanta, W. (2001). Agenda-setting and Spanish cable news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 277-289.
23.
Gonyea, D. (2004, July 23). Candidates on the issues: Iraq. National Public Radio.
24.
Hess, R., & Torney, J.V. (1968). The development of political attitudes in children . Chicago: Aldine.
25.
Holbert, R.L., & Stephenson, M.T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research, 28, 531-551.
26.
Hyman, H.H. (1959). Political socialization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
27.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D.R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
28.
Jost, J. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 657-670.
29.
Kanihan, S., & Chaffee, S.H. (1996, August). Situational influence of political involvement on information seeking: A field experiment. Paper presented to theAssociation for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
30.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
31.
Ki, E., & Hon, L. (2007). Testing the linkages among the organization-public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(1), 1-23.
32.
Kim, S., Scheufele, D.A., & Shanahan, J.E. (2002). Agenda-setting, priming, framing and second-levels in local politics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7-25.
33.
Kim, J., Wyatt, R.O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication , 16, 359-360.
34.
Kinder, D.R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 778-867). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
35.
Kiousis, S., & McCombs, M.E. (2004). Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength: Political figures during the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 31, 36-57.
36.
Kiousis, S., McDevitt, M., & Wu, X. (2005). The genesis of civic awareness: Agenda setting in political socialization. Journal of Communication, 55, 756-774.
37.
Krosnick, J., & Kinder, D. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
38.
Krosnick, J., & Petty, R. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. Petty & J. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Kubow, P.K., & Kinney, M.B. (2000). Fostering democracy in middle school classrooms: Insights from a democratic institute in Hungary. The Social Studies, 91, 265-271.
40.
Langton, K., & Jennings, M. (1968). Political socialization and the high school civics curriculum. American Political Science Review, 62, 852-877.
41.
Lasorsa, D.L., & Wanta, W. (1990). Effects of personal, interpersonal and media experiences on issue salience. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 804-813.
42.
Latane, B., & Nowak, A. (1994). Attitudes as catastrophes: From dimensions to categories with increasing involvement. In R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 219-249). New York: Academic Press.
43.
Liu, J.H., & Latane, B. (1998a). The catastrophe link between the importance and extremity of political attitudes. Political Behavior, 20, 105-126.
44.
Liu, J.H., & Latane, B. (1998b). Extremitization of attitudes: Does thought- and discussion-induced polarization cumulate? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 103-110.
45.
Luskin, R., McIver, J., & Carmines, E. (1989). Issues and the transmission of partisanship. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 440-458.
46.
McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Polity.
47.
McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2002). News influence on our pictures in the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 1-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
49.
McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. (1998). Second chance political socialization: "Trickle-up" effects of children on parents. In T. J. Johnson , C. E. Hays, & S. P. Hays (Eds.), Engaging the public: How government and the media can reinvigorate American Democracy (pp. 57-66). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
50.
McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S.H. (2002). From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication, 19, 281-301.
51.
McDevitt, M., & Kiousis, S. (2005). Experiments in political socialization: Kids Voting USA as a model for civic education reform (Final report to the Knight Foundation and the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement) . College Park, MD: Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement
52.
McDevitt, M., & Kiousis, S. (2006). Deliberative learning: Civic development as discursive transformation. Communication Education, 55, 247-264.
53.
McLeod, J., & Brown, J. (1976). Family environment and adolescent TV use. In R. Brown (Ed.), Children and television (pp. 199-233). London: Collier MacMillan.
54.
Meirick, P.C., & Wackman, D.B. (2004). Kids voting and political knowledge: Narrowing gaps, informing votes. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1161-1177.
55.
Miller, J.M., & Krosnick, J.A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315.
56.
Mortimore, R., & Tyrrell, C. (2004). Children's acquisition of political opinions. Journal of Public Affairs, 4, 279-298.
57.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2002 ). The NSSE 2002 report: From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.
58.
Niemi, R.G., & Jennings, M.K. (1991). Issues and inheritance in the formation of party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 970-988.
59.
Niemi, R.G., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2004). Moral values: How important? Voters liked campaign 2004, but too much "mud slinging."Washington, DC: Author.
61.
Plano, J.C., & Riggs, R.E. (1973). Dictionary of political analysis. Troy, MO: Dryden Press.
62.
Prislin, R. (1996). Attitude stability and attitude strength: One is enough to make it stable. European Journal of Social Psychology , 26, 447-477.
63.
Raden, D. (1985). Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 312-330.
64.
Roessler, P., & Schenk, M. (2000). Cognitive bonding and the German reunification: Agenda-setting and persuasion effects of mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 29-47.
65.
Saphir, M., & Chaffee, S. (2002). Adolescents' contributions to family communication patterns. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 86-108.
66.
Scott, W. (1968). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 204-273). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
67.
Sears, D.O., & Valentino, N.A. (1997). Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization. The American Political Science Review, 91, 45-65.
68.
Sigel, R.S. (1970). Learning about politics: A reader in political socialization. New York: Random House.
69.
Simon, J., & Merrill, B. (1998). Political socialization in the classroom revisited: The Kids Voting program. The Social Science Journal, 35, 29-42.
70.
Takeshita, T. (2006). Current critical problems in agenda-setting research . International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 275-296.
71.
Trumbo, C. (1995). Longitudinal modeling of public issues: An application of the agenda-setting process to the issue of global warming. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 152, 1-57.
72.
Valentino, N., & Sears, D. (1998). Event-driven political communication and the preadult socialization of partisanship. Political Behavior, 20, 127-154.
73.
Van der Maas, H., Kolstein, R., & van der Pligt, J. (2003). Sudden transitions in attitudes. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 125-152.
74.
Wanta, W. (1997). The public and the national agenda. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75.
Wanta, W., & Wu, Y.C. (1992). Interpersonal communication and the agenda-setting process. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 847-855.
76.
Weaver, D. (1984). Media agenda-setting and public opinion: Is there a link? In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 680-691). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
77.
Weaver, D.H. (1991). Issue salience and public opinion: Are there consequences of agenda-setting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3, 53-68.
78.
Weaver, D.H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming . Journal of Communication, 57, 142-147.
79.
Weaver, D., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (2004). Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), The handbook of political communication research (pp. 257-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80.
Yang, J., & Stone, G. (2003). The powerful role of interpersonal communication on agenda setting. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 57-74.
