Noncompliance with medication therapy and mental health care is prevalent among the mentally ill. Its multifactorial dynamics can include aspects of the illness itself, such as anosognosia. Noncompliance with medication can increase risk of violent or other criminal behavior, but the law currently does not recognize it as a factor in determining culpability. The legal test of insanity that focuses on a “defect of reason from disease of the mind” presumes that the disease was not self-induced. Noncompliance with medication and voluntary intoxication can both be seen as self-induced incapacities, but their adjudication is often quite different. A psychotic condition may be the basis of an excuse, whereas simple intoxication is not. The distinction is not only the obvious one of acts of omission (medication noncompliance) and acts of commission (voluntary intoxication). There are other complicating factors, such as the knowledge of the effects of noncompliance, the mental state prior to the noncompliance, and the presence of any conditions that would excuse or justify it. These and other considerations render the assignment of criminal responsibility for the noncompliant psychiatric offender complex. A possible solution to this would be the application of therapeutic jurisprudence to the noncompliant mentally ill offender.
AmadorX.AndreasenN. C.YaleS., & GormanJ. (1994). Awareness of illness in schizophrenia, schizoaffective and mood disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 826–836.
2.
AmadorX. F., & Paul-OdouardR. (2000). Defending the Unibomber: Anosognosia in Schizophrenia. Psychiatric Quarterly, 71, 363–371.
3.
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. (2005). Ethical guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Retrieved on March 1, 2012, from http://aapl.org/ethics.htm
4.
American Law Institute. (1980). Model penal code and Commentaries, Part II. Philadelphia, PA: Author.
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
6.
BazelonD. L. (1976). The morality of the criminal law. Southern California Law Review, 49, 385–405.
7.
BuchananA. (1992). A two-year prospective study of treatment compliance in patients with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 22, 787–797.
8.
CaplanL. (1984). The insanity defense and the trial of John W. Hinckley, Jr. Boston: David R. Godine.
9.
Carter v. United States, 252 F.2d 608 (D.C. Cir. 1957).
10.
Clark v. Arizona, 548 U. S. 735 (2006).
11.
DeighJ. (2011). Responsibility. In DeighJ. & DolinkoD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of criminal law (pp. 194–217). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
DelayJ.DenikerP., & HarlJ. M. (1952). Traitement des états d'excitation et d'agitation par une méthode médicamenteuse derivée de l'hibernothérapie. Annales Médico Psychologiques, 110, 267–273.
13.
Department of Public Prosecutions v. Majewski, A.C. 443 (U.K. 1977).
14.
DershowitzA. R. (1994). The abuse excuse and other cop-outs, sob stories, and evasions of responsibility. Boston: Little, Brown.
15.
Durham v. United States, 214 F. 2d 862. (D.C. Cir. 1954).
16.
FingaretteH., & HaasA. F. (1979). Mental disabilities and criminal responsibility. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
18.
GreenfieldD. P. (2009). Criminal responsibility from a clinical perspective. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 37, 7–35.
19.
KeithS. J., & KaneJ. M. (2003). Partial compliance and patient consequences in schizophrenia: Our patients can do better. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64, 1308–1315.
20.
LehmannH. E., & BanT. A. (1997). The history of the psychopharmacology of Schizophrenia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 152–162.
21.
M'Naghten's Case, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 (H.L. 1843).
22.
MarderS. R. (2003). Overview of partial compliance. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64 (Suppl. 16), 3–9.
23.
McDonald v. United States, 312 F. 2d 847 (1962).
24.
MitchellE. W. (1999). Madness and meta-responsibility: The culpable causation of mental disorder and the insanity defense. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 10, 597–622.
25.
MitchellE. W.2003). Self made madness Rethinking illness and criminal responsibiliy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co.
26.
MitchellE. W. (2004). Culpability for inducing mental states: The insanity defense of Dr. Jekyll. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32, 63–69.
27.
MonahanJ. (2008). Mandated community treatment: Applying leverage to achieve adherence. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 36, 282–285.
28.
Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (1996).
29.
OehlM.HummerM., & FleischhackerW. W. (2000). Compliance with antipsychotic treatment. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102 (s407), 83–86.
30.
People v. Skinner, 185 Cal. App. 3d 1050 (1986).
31.
PerlinM. L. (1994). The jurisprudence of the insanity defense. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
32.
RobinsonP. H. (1985). Causing the conditions of one's own defense: A study on the limits of theory in criminal law doctrine. Virginia Law Review, 71, 1–63.
33.
SherlockR. (1984). Compliance and responsibility: New issues for the insanity defense. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 12, 483–505.
34.
ShorterE. (1997). A history of psychiatry: From the era of the asylum to the age of Prozac. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
Sinnott-ArmstrongW., & LevyK. (2011). Insanity defenses. In DeighJ. & DolinkoD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of criminal law (pp. 299–334). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
SlodovM. D. (1990). Criminal responsibility and the noncompliant psychiatric offender: Risking madness. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 40, 271–330.
37.
State v. McCleary, Number CR49471 (C.P. Cuyahoga City, Ohio 1979), revised Number CR42116 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1980).
38.
State v. Ostwald, 591 P. 2d 646 (Mont. 1979).
39.
SwartzM. S.SwansonJ. W.HidayV. A.BorumR.WagnerH. R., & BurnsB. (1998). Violence and severe mental illness: The effects of substance abuse and nonadherence to medication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 226–231.
40.
SwartzM. S.WilderC. M.SwansonJ. W.Van DornR. A.RobbinsP. C.SteadmanH. J. (2010). Assessing outcomes for consumers in New York's assisted outpatient treatment program. Psychiatric Services, 61, 976–981.
41.
TorreyE. F. (2008). The Insanity Offense. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
42.
United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d 969 (1972).
43.
United States v. Samuels, 801 F.2d 1052 (8th Cir. 1986).
44.
Washington v. United States, 390 F.2d 444 (D.C. Cir. 1967).
45.
WeinstockR. (1999, March). Comparison of moral capacities of psychotic and addicted individuals. Presented at the XXIVth International Congress on Law and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
46.
WexlerD. B. (1981). Mental health law: Major issues. New York: Plenum Press.
47.
WexlerD. B. (1990a). Therapeutic jurisprudence: The law as a therapeutic agent. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
48.
WexlerD. B. (1990b). Inducing therapeutic compliance through the criminal law. Law and Psychology Review, 14, 43–57.
49.
YoungJ. L.SpiotzR. T.HillbrandM., & DaneriG. (1999). Medication adherence failure in schiziphrenia: A forensic review of rates, reasons, treatments, and prospects. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27(3), 426–444.
