Three Things That Should Be Used to Guide Investigative Interviews by Military and Intelligence Agencies

Abstract

The psychological study of investigative interviewing is over 100 years old (Munsterberg, 1908), with a rich literature and body of knowledge (Drizin and Leo, 2004; Kassin, Drizin, Grisso, Gudjonsson, Leo, & Redlich, 2009). Although behavioral and social science has focused primarily on investigations by police, findings should also be considered by investigators who work for military or intelligence agencies. The state of the science leads to at least three recommendations. First, all investigative interviews should be video-recorded in their entirety, with an equal focus on interviewers and interviewees. Second, rather than seeing interrogation as a method to persuade or coerce an uncooperative subject into confessing, investigators should consider interviews of suspects, victims, witnesses, and sources as investigative interviews, with a common goal of finding the truth. Third, because investigators do not really know which interviewees are guilty (have guilty knowledge) and which are not (do not), no law-enforcement, military, or intelligence-agency interrogator should ever use a technique on a “presumed-guilty” suspect that would not be appropriate for use with an innocent person.

Keywords

Interrogation confession detection of deception forensic psychology police psychology military psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bond

C. E.

, & Rao

S. R.

(2004). Lies travel: Mendacity in a mobile world. In Granhag

& Stromwell

(Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 127–147). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar. (2006). Report of the Events Relating to Maher Arar. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://www.ararcommission.ca/eng/AR_English.pdf.

DeClue

(2005). Interrogations and disputed confessions: A manual for forensic psychological practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press.

Drizin

, & Leo

R. A.

(2004). The Problem of False Confessions in the Post-DNA World. North Carolina Law Review, 3, 891–1008.

Fine

G. A.

(2008, June 10). Statement before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary Concerning Detainee Interrogation Techniques. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from www.usdoj.gov/oig/testimony/t0806a/final.pdf.

Gudjonsson

(2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester, England: Wiley.

Kassin

S. M.

(2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.

Kassin

S. M.

Drizin

Grisso

Gudjonsson

Leo

, & Redlich

(2009). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Retrieved August 2, 2000, from http://www.ap-ls.org/links/Police_Induced_Confessions_White_Paper_Oct08.pdf.

Kassin

S. M.

, & Gudjonsson

G. H.

(2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67.

10.

Kassin

& Neumann

(1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 469–484.

11.

Leo

(1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of criminal law and criminology, 86, 266–303.

12.

Leo

(2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

Leo

R. A.

Kassin

S. M.

Richman

K. D.

Colwell

L. H.

Leach

La Fon

(2006, March). Police Interviewing and Interrogation: Toward a National Self-Report Survey of Police Practices & Beliefs. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society.

14.

Meijer

E. H.

Verschuere

Vrij

Merckelbach

Smulders

Leal

(2009). A call for evidence-based security tools. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1, 1–4. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://www.forensicpsychologyunbound.ws/.

15.

Meissner

C. A.

, & Kassin

S. M.

(2002). “He's guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law & Human Behavior, 26, 469–480.

16.

Merriam-Webster Online. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary.

17.

Munsterberg

(1908), On the witness stand. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

18.

Ofshe

, & Leo

(1997). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979–1122.

19.

Rhode Island v. Innis, 466 U.S. 291.

20.

Trainum

(2007, September 20). I took a false confession — So don't tell me it doesn't happen! The California Majority Report. Retrieved August 7, 2009, from http://www.camajorityreport.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&ptid=9&aid=2306.

21.

Vrij

(2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.

22.

Wills

(2005). Taped interrogations can still be false. Los Angeles Times, July 17, 2005. [Electronic version.] Retrieved August 7, 2009, from http://www.ap-ls.org/links/Police_Induced_Confessions_White_Paper_Oct08.pdf.