A neglected area in deception research is what constitutes a good liar. On the basis of deception theory, people's views about how liars respond, impression formation theory, and persuasion theory, we describe eighteen attributes which in our view are present in a good liar. Insight into these characteristics will help law enforcement personnel in two ways: It provides insight into who would be suitable for undercover operations, and it may help lie detectors, because one reason why people make errors in lie detection is that they do not take the full complexity of deception into account and seem to have limited knowledge about what is actually going on in a liar's mind.
AmbadyN.BernieriF. J., & RichesonJ. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behaviour: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 201–271.
2.
AuneR. K.LevineT.ChingP., & YoshimotoJ. (1993). The influence of perceived source reward value and attributions of deception. Communication Research Reports, 10, 15–27.
3.
BaddeleyA. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
4.
BennettW. L., & FeldmanM. S. (1981). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. London: Tavistock.
5.
BondC. F.OmarA.PitreU.LashleyB. R.SkaggsL. M., & KirkC. T. (1992). Fishy-looking liars: Deception judgment from expectancy violation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 969–977.
6.
BrehmS. S.KassinS. M., & FeinS. (1999). Social Psychology, (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
BullR. (2004). Training to detect deception from behavioural cues: Attempts and problems. In GranhagP. A. & StrömwallL. A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 251–268). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BullR., & RumseyN. (1988). The social psychology of facial appearance. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
BullerD. B., & AuneR. K. (1988). The effects of vocalics and nonverbal sensitivity on compliance: A speech accommodation theory explanation. Human Communication Research, 14, 301–332.
10.
BullerD. B., & BurgoonJ. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242.
11.
BurgoonJ. K.BullerD. B.FloydK., & GrandpreJ. (1996). Deceptive realities: Sender, receiver, and observer perspectives in deceptive conversations. Communication Research, 23, 724–748.
12.
BurgoonJ. K.BullerD. B., & GuerreroL. K. (1995). Interpersonal deception IX: Effects of social skill and nonverbal communication on deception success and detection accuracy. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 289–311.
13.
ChartrandT. L., & BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behaviour link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
14.
CrowleyA. E., & HoyerW. D. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 561–574.
15.
DePauloB. M. (1992). Nonverbal behaviour and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.
16.
DePauloB. M., & FriedmanH. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T., & LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–40). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
17.
DePauloB. M.KashyD. A.KirkendolS. E.WyerM. M., & EpsteinJ. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995.
18.
DePauloB. M., & KirkendolS. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In YuilleJ. C. (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
EaglyA. H.WoodW., & ChaikenS. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424–435.
21.
EkmanP. (1997). Deception, lying, and demeanour. In HalpernD. F. & VoiskounskyA. E. (Eds.), States of mind: American and postsoviet perspectives on contemporary issues in psychology (pp. 93–105). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
EkmanP. (2001). Telling lies. New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1985).
23.
EkmanP.DavidsonR. J., & FriesenW. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353.
24.
EkmanP., & FrankM. G. (1993). Lies that fail. In LewisM. & SaarniC. (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 184–201). New York: Guildford Press.
25.
EkmanP., & FriesenW. V. (1982). Felt, false, and miserable smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 6, 238–253.
26.
FrankM. G., & EkmanP., & FriesenW. V. (1993). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 83–93.
27.
FriedmanH. S., & Miller-HerringerT. (1991). Nonverbal display of emotion in public and private: Self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 766–775.
28.
FriedmanH. S.RiggioR. E., & CasellaD. F. (1988). Nonverbal skill, personal charisma, and initial attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 203–211.
29.
The Global Deception Team (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74.
30.
GoznaL.VrijA., & BullR. (2001). The impact of individual differences on perceptions of lying in everyday life and in high stakes situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1203–1216.
31.
GranhagP.A. & HartwigM. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200.
32.
GranhagP.A., & StrömwallL.A. (1999). Repeated interrogations—Stretching the deception detection paradigm. Expert Evidence—The International Journal of Behavioural Sciences in Legal Context, 7, 163–174.
33.
GranhagP.A., & StrömwallL.A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243–257.
34.
GranhagP.A.StrömwallL.A., & JonssonA.C. (2003). Partners in crime: How liars in collusion betray themselves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 848–867.
35.
HartwigM.GranhagP. A., & StrömwallL. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects' strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 213–227.
36.
KashyD. A., & DePauloB. M. (1996). Who lies?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1037–1051.
37.
KassinS.M., & NorwickRJ. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211–221.
38.
O'SullivanM. (2003). The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: The boy-who-cried-wolf-effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1316–1327.
39.
RiggioR. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660.
40.
RiggioR.E.TuckerJ., & ThrockmortonB. (1988). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 568–577.
41.
RiggioR. E.TuckerJ., & WidamanK. F. (1987). Verbal and nonverbal cues as mediators of deception ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 11, 126–145.
42.
SavitskyK. & GilovichT. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 618–625.
43.
StrömwallL. A.GranhagP. A., & HartwigM. (2004). Practitioners' beliefs about deception. In GranhagP. A. & StrömwallL. A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229–250). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
StrömwallL. A.GranhagP. A., & LandströmS. (2007). Children's prepared and unprepared lies: Can adults see through their strategies?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 457–471.
45.
StrömwallL. A.HartwigM., & GranhagP. A. (2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 207–219.
46.
Tickle-DegnenL., & RosenthalR. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285–293.
47.
VrijA. (2004a). Guidelines to catch a liar. In GranhagP. A. & StrömwallL. A. (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 287–314). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48.
VrijA. (2004b). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159–181.
49.
VrijA. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
50.
VrijA.AkehurstL., & KnightS. (2006). Police officers', social workers', teachers' and the general public's beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 297–312.
51.
VrijA.AkehurstL.SoukaraS., & BullR. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 261–283.
52.
VrijA.AkehurstL.SoukaraS., & BullR. (2004). Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and Reality Monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36(2), 113–126.
53.
VrijA.EdwardK., & BullR. (2001). Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 899–909.
54.
VrijA.FisherR.MannS., & LealS. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142.
55.
VrijA.LealS.GranhagP. A.MannS.FisherR. P.HillmanJ. (in press). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior.
56.
VrijA., & MannS. (2001). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187–203.
57.
VrijA.SeminG. R., & BullR. (1996). Insight in behavior displayed during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544–562.
58.
ZuckermanM.DePauloB. M., & RosenthalR. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (vol. 14, pp. 1–57). New York: Academic Press.
