Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Traditionally, the bioequivalence of a generic drug with the innovator's product is assessed by comparing their pharmacokinetic profiles determined from the blood or plasma concentration-time curves. This method may only be applicable to formulations where blood drug or metabolite levels adequately characterize absorption and metabolism, not to the nonsystematic drugs categorized by the lack of systemic presence. When pharmacologic effects of the drugs can be easily measured, pharmacodynamic effect studies can be used to assess the therapeutic equivalence of nonsystemic drugs. When analytical methods or other tests cannot be developed to permit the use of the pharmacodynamic method, therapeutic equivalence clinical trials to compare one or several clinical endpoints may be the only suitable method of establishing therapeutic equivalence. This paper evaluates by Monte-Carlo simulations the fixed sample performances of some two one-sided tests procedures when the endpoints of the therapeutic equivalence trials are binary.

Keywords

Binary endpoints Hauck-Anderson corrections Monte-Carlo simulations Therapeutic equivalence Two one-sided tests procedure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chow

Liu

. Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992.

Boe

Ljungholm

. Drug intake and plasma concentrations in acute asthma. Respiration. 1984;45:430–437.

Adams

Molzon

Singh

GJP

. Interim Guidance for Documentation of In Vivo Bioequivalence of Albuterol Inhalation Aerosols (Metered Dose Inhalers). Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, Division of Bioequivalence; 1994.

Winfield

. Draft Guidance For the Performance of A Bioequivalence Study for Vaginal Antifungal Products. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products; 1990.

Reports

F-D-C

. Mebendazole Generic Products Must Undergo Clinical Outcomes Studies. The Pink Sheet. August 15, 1994, T&G-2.

. Two one-sided tests procedures in establishing therapeutic equivalence with binary clinical points: Fixed sample performances and sample size determination. J Stat Comp Simul. 1997.

Dunnett

Gent

. Significance testing to establish equivalence between treatments, with special reference to data in the form of 2 × 2 tables. Biometrics. 1977;33:593–602.

Rodary

Com-Nougue

Tournade

. How to establish equivalence between treatments: A one-sided clinical trial in paediatric oncology. Stat Med. 1989;8:593–598.

Schuirmann

. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharm Biopharm. 1987;15:657–680.

10.

Casella

Berger

. Statistical Inference. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks; 1990.

11.

Farrington

Manning

. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk. Stat Med. 1990;9:1447–1454.

12.

Hauck

Anderson

. A comparison of large-sample confidence interval methods for the difference of two binomial probabilities. Am Stat. 1986;40:318–322.

13.

SAS Institute Inc. SAS Language Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1988.

14.

Liu

Weng

. Evaluation of parametric and nonparametric two one-sided tests procedures for assessing bioequivalence of average bioavailability. Proceedings of Biopharmaceutic Section of America Statistical Association. 1992;92–97.

A Comparative Study of Some Statistical Procedures in Establishing Therapeutic Equivalence of Nonsystemic Drugs with Binary Endpoints

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References