The limited current use of these methods is reviewed. Greater use would be well worthwhile, and may come about because of external pressures, if for no other reason. Examples of some under-used procedures are then described. One is a profitability index which takes account of the sequential nature of decisions and may be used to prioritize projects. The other is a stochastic model for a research project which proceeds through a number of stages at a rate which depends on the number of scientists allocated to it.
AllportS. Resource planning — where do we go from here? Presented at the 5th DIA European Workshop on Statistical Methodology in Clinical R&D, Edinburgh 1994.
2.
HigginsJCWattsKM. Some perspective on the use of management science techniques in R & D management. R & D Management.1986;16:291–296.
3.
PearsonAW. Planning and control in R & D. Omega.1990;18:573–581.
4.
BurnettWM. R & D Project Appraisal at the Gas Research Institute: Part II. Opers Res.1993;41: 1020–1032.
5.
LogothetisNWynnHP. Quality Through Design.Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1989.
6.
MathesonJE. Managing R&D portfolios for improved profitability and productivity. J Sci Policy Res Man.1989;4:400–412.
7.
IsleiE. A decision support system using judgemental modelling: a case of R & D in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Trans on Eng Man.1991;38:202–209.
8.
GrabowskiH. Pharmaceutical R&D: returns and risk. Centre for Medicines Research Annual Lecture, CMR, London; 1991.
9.
BergmanSWGittinsJC. Statistical Methods for Pharmaceutical Research Planning.New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985.
10.
PearsonAW. The use of ranking formulae in R & D projects. R&D Management.1972;2:69–73.
11.
BoschiRAA. Modelling exploratory research. Euro J Oper Res.1982;10:250–259.
12.
SpilkerB. Multinational Drug Companies — Issues in Drug Discovery and Development.New York: Raven Press; 1989.
13.
GittinsJC. A planning procedure for new-product chemical research. R&D Management.1994;24:219–227.
