Abstract
During the last 10 years, interest in causality assessment has generally increased. New methods have been published and existing ones updated. Twenty-two national drug monitoring centers assess causality, though they mostly use evaluators' knowledge and experience, and not a formal method. The relative merits of spontaneous monitoring vs pharmacoepidemiological studies are better understood. Legal implications of causality assessment by an expert vs assessment using a method are discussed. The selection of a method is based on its internal logic, simplicity, or convenience rather than on its proven validity, which is not easily demonstrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
