Marketing managers face increasing pressure to justify any strategic action with financial metrics that facilitate comparative evaluations with alternative options. Using event study method, the authors focus attention on the impact of high-profile quality achievement awards on the stock prices of the award-winning firms. Two types of awards are investigated: the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) and J. D. Power and Associates Awards (JDPAA). Previous event studies found no major impact of MBNQA announcements on the stock price of MBNQA winners; in contrast, this study’s results show that these awards generate significant shareholder value for MBNQA winners. With respect to the JDPAA, the authors’ analyses did not find any such impact in the Automotive, Travel, and Finance categories. Multiple regression analyses suggest that firms with higher amounts of intangible assets are more likely to create shareholder value. Implications of the results for different decision horizon perspectives are derived.
Aaker, David A. and Robert Jacobson. 1987. “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research31:191-201.
2.
Agrawal, Jagdish and Wagner A. Kamakura. 1995. “The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis.”Journal of Marketing59:56-62.
3.
Boehmer, Ekhart, James Musumeci, and Annette B. Poulsen. 1991. “Event-Study Methodology Under Conditions of Event-Induced Variance. Journal of Financial Economics30:253-272.
4.
Brown, Stephen and J. Warner. 1985. “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.”Journal of Financial Economics14: 3-31.
5.
Business Week. 2005. “J. D. Power’s New Driver,” March 21, p. 44.
6.
Chaney, Paul K., Timothy M. Devinney, and Russell Winer. 1991. “The Impact of New Product Introductions on the Market Value of Firms.”Journal of Business64:573-610.
7.
Day, George and Liam Fahey. 1990. “Putting Strategy Into Shareholder Value Analysis.”Harvard Business Review68 (March/April): 156-162.
8.
Eriksson, Henrik, Fredrik Johansson, and HakanWiklund. 2003. “Effects of In-Company Quality Awards on Organizational Performance.”Total Quality Management14:235-242.
9.
Fama, Eugene F.1970. “Efficient Capital Markets.”Journal of Finance25:383-417.
10.
Fama, Eugene F.1991. “Efficient Capital Markets: II.”Journal of Finance46:1575-1617.
11.
Fisher, Donald C.1994. Measuring Up to the Baldrige. New York: American Management Association.
12.
Haavind, Robert. 1992. The Road to the Baldrige Award. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
13.
Hart, Christopher W. L. and Christopher E. Bogan. 1992. The Baldrige: What It Is, How It’s Won, How to Use It to Improve Quality in Your Company. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Hendricks, Kevin B. and Vinod R. Singhal. 2001. “The Long Run Stock Price Performance of Firms With Effective TQM Programs.”Management Science47 (3): 359-368.
15.
Hodgetts, Richard M.1993. Blueprints for Continuous Improvement: Lessons From the Baldrige Winners. New York: American Management Association.
16.
Horsky, Dan and Patrick Swyngedouw. 1987. “Does It Pay to Change Your Company’s Name? A Stock Market Perspective.”Marketing Science6:320-335.
17.
Kim, Jooyoung, and Jon D. Morris. 2003. “The Effect of Advertising on the Market Value of Firms: Empirical Evidence From the Super Bowl Ads.”Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing12:53-65.
18.
Kulkarni, Mukund S., Premal P. Vora, and Terence A. Brown. 2003. “Firing Advertising Agencies.”Journal of Advertising32 (3): 77-86.
19.
Lane, Vicki and Robert Jacobson. 1995. “Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effect of Brand Attitude and Familiarity.”Journal of Marketing59:63-77.
20.
Lee, S. M., B. H. Rho, and S. G. Lee. 2003. “Impact of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria on Organizational Quality Performance.”International Journal of Production Research41:2003-2020.
21.
Mathur, Lynette K. and Ike Mathur. 1995. “The Effect of Advertising Slogan Changes on the Market Values of Firms.”Journal of Advertising Research35:59-65.
22.
Mathur, Lynette K. and Ike Mathur. 1996. “Is Value Associated With Initiating New Advertising Agency-Client Relations?”Journal of Advertising25 (Fall): 1-11.
23.
Mathur, Lynette K. and Ike Mathur. 2000. “An Analysis of the Wealth Effects of Green Marketing Strategies.”Journal of Business Research50:193-200.
24.
Mathur, Lynette K., Ike Mathur., and Nanda Rangan. 1997. “The Wealth Effects Associated With a Celebrity Endorser: The Michael Jordan Phenomenon.”Journal of Advertising Research37 (3): 67-73.
25.
Miyazaki, Anthony D. and Angela G. Morgan. 2001. “Assessing Market Value of Event Sponsoring: Corporate Olympic Sponsorships.”Journal of Advertising Research41 (January/February): 9-15.
26.
Pauwels, Koen, Jorge Silva-Risso, Shuba Srinivasan, and Dominique Hanssens. 2004. “New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry.”Journal of Marketing68 (October): 142-156.
27.
Przasnyski, Zbigniew H.1999. “Stock Market Reaction to Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Announcements: Does Quality Pay?”Total Quality Management10:391-400.
28.
Przasnyski, Zbigniew H. and Lawrence S. Tai. 2002. “Stock Performance of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Winning Companies.”Total Quality Management13:475-488.
29.
Rust, Roland T., Anthony J. Zahorik, and Timothy L. Keiningham. 1995. “Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially Accountable.”Journal of Marketing59 (April): 58-70.
30.
Simon, Carol J. and Mary W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach.”Marketing Science12 (Winter): 28-52.
31.
Srivastava, Rajendra K., Liam Fahey, and H. Kurt Christensen. 2001. “The Resource-Based View and Marketing: The Role of Market-Based Assets in Gaining Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management27:777-802.
32.
Srivastava, Rajendra K., Tasadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey. 1998. “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis.”Journal of Marketing62: 2-18.
33.
Subcommittee on Technology of the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives. 1995. The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Awards Program: An Oversight Review From Its Inception, October 18. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
34.
Subcommittee on Technology, Environment and Aviation of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives. 1993. Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award: Has It Made a Difference? February 18 Washongton, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
Subcommittee on Technology, Environment and Aviation of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives. 1994. Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, February 9. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
