Creating a positive classroom experience for students can be a challenge, especially when teaching a contested topic such as gender studies. Teaching and learning gender is teaching and learning against the grain, which can lead to feelings of comfort and discomfort among students. The objective is to capture different manifestations of dis/comfort and transformation within the classroom by presenting a case based on gender studies. The study builds on course evaluations collected between 2009 and 2019. The findings reveal three appearances of dis/comfort: inexplicit manifestations, explicit manifestations, and a transformation stage in which the experienced dis/comfort operates as a steppingstone leading to possible change through affective dissonance. We suggest that discomfort can be mitigated by openly discussing resistance and by giving students more autonomy over course assessment and lecture content but without watering down the curricula. Thus, it is possible to navigate transformation and reduce compliancy with the ruling regime.
ÅhällLinda. 2018. “Affect as Methodology: Feminism and the Politics of Emotion.” International Political Sociology12:36–52.
2.
AhmedSara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
ArthurLinet. 2020. “Evaluating Student Satisfaction – Restricting Lecturer Professionalism: Outcomes of Using the UK National Student Survey Questionnaire for Internal Student Evaluation of Teaching.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education45(3):331–44.
4.
BaconDonaldJohnsonCarolStewartKim. 2016. “Nonresponse Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching.” Marketing Education Review26(2):93–104.
5.
BlackmoreJill. 2009. “Academic Pedagogies, Quality Logics and Performative Universities: Evaluating Teaching and What Students Want.” Studies in Higher Education34(8):857–72.
6.
BoringAnneOttoboniKellieStarkPhilip B.2016. “Students’ Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness.” Science Open Research10. doi:10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1.
7.
BruEdvinVirtanenTuomoKjetilstadVidarNiemiecChristopher. 2021. “Gender Differences in the Strength of Association between Perceived Support from Teachers and Student Engagement.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research65(1):153–68.
8.
CahillHelenDadvandBabak. 2020. “Triadic Labour in Teaching for the Prevention of Gender-Based Violence.” Gender and Education33(2):252–66. doi:10.1080/09540253.2020.1722070.
CavinessCourtneyGiuffrePattiWasley-ValdezMaria. 2016. “They Don’t Get It: The Promise and Problem of Using Student Resistance as a Pedagogical Tool.” Pp. 175–84 in Teaching Gender and Sex in Contemporary America, edited by HaltinnerK.PilgeramR.Cham, Switserland: Springer.
11.
ChadwickRachelle. 2021. “On the Politics of Discomfort.” Feminist Theory22(4):556–74. doi:10.1177/1464700120987379.
12.
ClaysonDennis. 2009. “Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are They Related to What Students Learn? A Meta Analysis and Review of the Literature.” Journal of Marketing Education31(1):16–30.
13.
DavidMiriam. 2014. Feminism, Gender and Universities: Politics, Passion and Pedagogies. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
14.
DenzinNorman. 1970. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
15.
EdgleyAlisonRobertsJulie. 2021. “Love, Fear and Disgust: Deconstructing Masculinities and Affective Embodiment in Pregnancy Guides for Men.” Men and Masculinities24(4):652–70. doi:10.1177/1097184X21990711.
16.
EnkhturAriunaaYamamotoBeverly Anne. 2017. “Transformative Learning Theory and Its Application in Higher Education Settings: A Review Paper.” 大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科紀要43:193–214.doi:10.18910/60584.
17.
EnloeCynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
EvansMary. 2011. “Doing Gender: Gender and Women’s Studies in the Twenty First Century.” Women’s Studies International Forum34:603–10. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2011.08.001.
19.
FeistauerDanielaRichterTobias. 2017. “How Reliable Are Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Quality? A Variance Components Approach.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education42(8):1263–79. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083.
20.
FranklinHayleyHarringtonIngrid. 2019. “A Review into Effective Classroom Management and Strategies for Student Engagement: Teacher and Student Roles on Today’s Classrooms.” Journal of Education and Training Studies7(12). doi:10.11114/jets.v7i12.4491.
21.
FreirePaulo. 2005. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: The Continuum International.
22.
GabrieleGriffin, ed. 2004. Employment, Equal Opportunities and Women’s Studies: Women’s Experiences in Seven European Countries. Königstein, Germany: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.
23.
GabrieleGriffin, ed. 2005. Doing Women’s Studies: Employment Opportunities, Personal Impacts and Social Consequences. London: Zed Books.
24.
GuðbergsdóttirMaríannaPétursdóttirGyða Margrét. 2014. “‘Maður sér bara að þau fá kynjagleraugun og það breytist allt sem þau gera.’ Upplifun framhaldsskólakennara af kynjafræðikennslu” Pp. 1–9in Rannsóknir í félagsvísindum XV, edited by ÓmarsdóttirS.Reykjavik, Iceland: Háskóli Íslands.
25.
GustavssonAnders. 1996. “Three Basic Steps in Formal Data Structure Analysis.” Department of Education, University of Stockholm, Stockholm. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
HeijstraThamarPétursdóttirGyða Margrét. 2022a. “Feminist Academics Strategically Playing Offense/Defense in Pursue of Academic and Societal Change.” Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research. doi:10.1080/08038740.2022.2080255.
27.
HeijstraThamarPetursdóttirGyða Margrét. 2022b. “Sisterly Advice for Feminists in Academia When Playing the Game and Working the Cracks.” Gender and Education34(3):247–61.
28.
HemmingsClare. 2012. “Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation.” Feminist Theory13(2):147–61.
29.
HendersonEmily. 2019. “On Being the ‘Gender Person’ in an Academic Department: Constructions, Configurations and Implications.” Journal of Gender Studies28(6):730–42.
30.
hooksbell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress. London: Routledge.
HorwathIlonaDiablChristian. 2019. “Liberating or Indoctrinating? Surveying Students’ Perceptions of a Women’s and Gender Studies Requirement.” Gender and Education32(8):1109–26. doi:10.1080/09540253.2019.1608355.
33.
HowiePeterBagnallRichard. 2015. “A Critical Comparison of Transformation and Deep Approach Theories of Learning.” International Journal of Lifelong Education34(3):348–65.
34.
JóhannsdóttirÁstaEgilsonSnæfríður Þ.GibsonBarbara. 2020. “What’s Shame Got to Do with It? The Importance of Affect in Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society36(3):342–57. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1751076.
35.
JurvaRaisaLahtiAnnukka. 2019. “Challenging Unequal Gendered Conventions in Heterosexual Relationship Contexts through Affective Dissonance.” Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research27(4):218–30.
36.
KeddieAmanda. 2020. “Engaging Boys in Gender Activism: Issues of Discomfort and Emotion.” Gender and Education33(2):171–85. doi:10.1080/09540253.2020.1716956.
37.
KleinmanSherrylCoppMartha. 2009. “Denying Social Harm: Students’ Resistance to Lessons about Inequality.” Teaching Sociology37(3):283–93.
38.
KorolczukElzbietaGraffAgnieszka. 2018. “Gender as ‘Ebola from Brussels’: The Anti-Colonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society43(4):797–821.
39.
KristjánsdóttirKaren ÁstaPétursdóttirGyða Margrét. 2015. “‘Ég fékk svona KABÚUM’: Áhrif femínískrar þekkingarsköpunar á meistaranema í kynjafræði við Háskóla Íslands.” Pp. 1–8 in Rannsóknir í félagsvísindum XVI, edited by ÓlafsH.HeijstraT. M.Reykjavik, Iceland: Háskóli Íslands.
40.
LinkonS.1992. “From Experience to Analysis: Using Student Discomfort in the Feminist Classroom.” Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy3(2):57–66.
41.
LiptonBrionyMackinlayElizabeth. 2017. We Only Talk Feminist Here: Feminist Academics, Voice and Agency in the Neoliberal University. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
MannSarah J.2001. “Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: Alienation and Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education26(1):7–19.
43.
ManneKate. 2020. Entitled: How Male Privilege Hurts Women. New York, NY: Crown.
44.
McKnightLucinda. 2018. “A Bit of a Dirty Word: ‘Feminism’ and Female Teachers Identifying as Feminists.” Journal of Gender Studies27(2):220–30.
45.
MessnerMichael. 2000. “White Guy Habitus in the Classroom: Challenging the Reproduction of Privilege.” Men and Masculinities2(4):457–69.
46.
MillarKrystina. 2020. “Rewards and Resistance: The Importance of Teaching Women’s and Gender Studies at a Southern Comprehensive, Liberal Arts University.” Gender and Education33(4):403–19. doi:10.1080/09540253.2020.1722069.
47.
MillerJoannChamberlinMarilyn2000. “Women Are Teachers, Men Are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions.” Teaching Sociology28(4):283–98.
48.
MitchellKristinaMartinJonathan. 2018. “Gender Bias in Student Evaluations.” PS: Political Science & Politics51(3):648–52.
49.
MurrayÓrlaKalayjiLisa. 2018. “Forging Queer Feminist Futures through Discomfort: Vulnerability and Authority in the Classroom.” Journal of Applied Social Theory1(2):12–34.
50.
NgaiSianne. 2007. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
ParsonsElizabethPriolaVincenza. 2013. “Agents for Change and Changed Agents: The Micro-politics of Change and Feminism in the Academy.” Gender, Work and Organization20(5):580–98.
52.
ParvulescuAnca. 2019. “Affect.” Pp. 95–108 in The Bloomsbury Handbook of 21st-Century Feminist Theory, edited by GoodmanR. T.London: Bloomsbury Academic.
53.
PereiraMaria. 2012. “Uncomfortable Classrooms: Rethinking the Role of Student Discomfort in Feminist Teaching.” European Journal of Women’s Studies19(1):128–35.
54.
PereiraMaria. 2017. Power, Knowledge and Feminist Scholarship: An Ethnography of Academia. London: Routledge.
55.
PétursdóttirGyða Margrét. 2009. “Within the Aura of Gender Equality: Icelandic Work Cultures, Gender Relations and Family Responsibility: A Holistic Approach.” PhD dissertation, Faculty of Political Science, University of Iceland.
56.
PittmanChavella. 2010. “Race and Gender Oppression in the Classroom: The Experiences of Women Faculty of Color with White Male Students.” Teaching Sociology38(3):183–96.
57.
PleasantsRobert. 2011. “Men Learning Feminism: Protecting Privileges through Discourses of Resistance.” Men and Masculinities14(2):230–50.
58.
PohlhausGaile. 2012. “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Towards a Theory of Willful Hermeneutic Ignorance.” Hypatia27(4):715–35.
59.
PowellNenaRubensteinCynthiaSawinErika M.AnnanSandra. 2014. “Student evaluations of teaching tools: a qualitative examination of student perceptions.” Nurse Educator39(6):274–9.
60.
RakowLana. 1991. “Gender and Race in the Classroom: Teaching Way out of Line.” Feminist Teacher6(1):10–13.
61.
RosenAndrew. 2018. “Correlations, Trends and Potential Biases among Publicly Accessible Web-Based Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Large-Scale Study of RateMyProfessors.com Data.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education43(1):31–44.
62.
ScharffChristina. 2012. Repudiating Feminism: Young Women in a Neoliberal World. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
63.
SingerDanielHunterMargaret. 1999. “The Experience of Premature Menopause: A Thematic Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 17(1):63–81. doi:10.1080/02646839908404585.
64.
SpoorenPieterBroncxaBertMortelmansDimitri. 2013. “On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art.” Review of Educational Research83(4):598–642.
65.
TevenJasonMcCroskyJames. 1997. “The Relationship of Perceived Teacher Caring with Student Learning and Teacher Evaluation.” Communication Education46(1):1–9.
66.
ThompsonBecky. 2017. Teaching with Tenderness: Toward an Embodied Practice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
67.
TitusJordan. 2010. “Engaging Student Resistance to Feminism: ‘How is This Stuff Going to Make Us Better Teachers?’” Gender and Education12(1):21–37.
68.
Van MaarenVictoriaJaquettCarolineWilliamsRobert. 2016. “Factors Most Likely to Contribute to Positive Course Evaluations.” Innovative Higher Education41(5):425–40.
WandersFrankDijkstraAnneMaslowskiRalfVeenIneke van derAmnåErik. 2021. “The Role of Teachers, Parents, and Friends in Developing Adolescents’ Societal Interest.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research65(5):736–51.
71.
WangGuannanWilliamsonAimee. 2020. “Course Evaluation Scores: Valid Measures for Teaching Effectiveness or Rewards for Lenient Grading?” Teaching in Higher Education27(3):297–318. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1722992.
72.
WebberMichelle. 2005. “Don’t Be So Feminist: Exploring Student Resistance to Feminist Approaches in a Canadian University.” Women’s Studies International Forum28(2–3):181–94.
73.
WeitzRose. 2010. “Teaching Dangerously: When Feminisms Collide.” Feminist Teacher20(3):226–36.
