How did instructors design their sociology courses for remote teaching during the 2020–2021 academic year, and what challenges did they face in teaching those courses? To answer these questions, we surveyed lead instructors and graduate teaching assistants (n = 77) in the Sociology Department at the University of Michigan, supplemented by interviews with students and our experiences as remote course consultants. Through this case study, we found that instructors cited increased workload and lack of connection as challenges with remote teaching, in addition to pandemic-related struggles. Most instructors reported using either synchronous or a mix of synchronous and asynchronous instruction in course design, incorporating both formative and summative assessments, and implementing communication and community-building strategies to establish connections with and among students. We argue that these challenges and course designs highlight the importance of care-informed pedagogy to not only remote teaching in 2020–2021 but also sociology instruction in general.
BakerSarahButtigiegBobCantillonZelmariePavlidisAdeleCastroLaura R.WatsonAsh. 2020. “Getting Students to ‘Do’ Introductory Sociology: Analysis of a Blended and Flipped Interactive Workshop Model.” Journal of Sociology57(3):612–30.
BridglandAngelaBlanchardPatrick. 2001. “Flexible Delivery/Flexible Learning . . . Does It Make a Difference?” Australian Academic & Research Libraries32(3):177–91.
4.
CarelloJanice. n.d. “Trauma-Informed Teaching and Learning: Bringing a Trauma-Informed Approach to Higher Education.” Retrieved April 12, 2021. https://traumainformedteaching.blog.
5.
CollisBettyMoonenJef. 2002. “Flexible Learning in a Digital World.” Open Learning17(3):217–30.
6.
ConradRita-MarieDonaldsonJ. Ana. 2012. Continuing to Engage the Online Learner: More Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
DixsonDante D.WorrellFrank C.2016. “Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom.” Theory into Practice55(2):153–59.
8.
DriscollAdamJichaKarlHuntAndrea N.TichavskyLisaThompsonGretchen. 2012. “Can Online Courses Deliver In-Class Results? A Comparison of Student Performance and Satisfaction in an Online versus a Face-to-Face Introductory Sociology Course.” Teaching Sociology40(4):312–31.
9.
EringfeldSimone. 2021. “Higher Education and Its Post-coronial Future: Utopian Hopes and Dystopian Fears at Cambridge University during COVID-19.” Studies in Higher Education46(1):146–57.
GarrisonD. RandyVaughanNorman D.2008. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Gillett-SwanJenna. 2017. “The Challenges of Online Learning: Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner.” Journal of Learning Design10(1):20–30.
16.
GillisAlannaKrullLaura M.2020. “COVID-19 Remote Learning Transition in Spring 2020: Class Structures, Student Perceptions, and Inequality in College Courses.” Teaching Sociology48(4):283–99.
17.
HillJanette R.2006. “Flexible Learning Environments: Leveraging the Affordances of Flexible Delivery and Flexible Learning.” Innovative Higher Education31(3):187–97.
HsiaoWei-Ying. 2010. “In-Service Teachers’ Perspectives of Enhancing Asynchronous Classroom Interaction with a Face-to-Face Real-Time Meeting Software.” International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society6(4):27–40.
20.
HubaMary E.FreedJann E.2000. Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
21.
HughesConrad. 2020. “COVID-19 and the Opportunity to Design a More Mindful Approach to Learning.” PROSPECTS49(1):69–72.
Kaplan-RakowskiRegina. 2021. “Addressing Students’ Emotional Needs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Perspective on Text versus Video Feedback in Online Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development69(1):133–36.
27.
KarakayaKadir. 2021. “Design Considerations in Emergency Remote Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Human-Centered Approach.” Educational Technology Research and Development69(1):295–99.
28.
KearnsLorna R.2012. “Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and Effective Practices.” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching8(3):198–208.
29.
KenneyJaneNewcombeEllen. 2011. “Adopting a Blended Learning Approach: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in an Action Research Study.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks15(1):45–57.
MeansBarbaraBakiaMarianneMurphyRobert. 2014. Learning Online: What Research Tells Us about Whether, When, and How. New York: Routledge.
32.
MehrotraGita R.2021. “Centering a Pedagogy of Care in the Pandemic.” Qualitative Social Work20(1–2):537–43.
33.
MehtaRohitAguileraEarl. 2020. “A Critical Approach to Humanizing Pedagogies in Online Teaching and Learning.” International Journal of Information and Learning Technology37(3):109–20.
34.
MolockSherry D.ParchemBenjamin. 2021. “The Impact of COVID-19 on College Students from Communities of Color.” Journal of American College Health. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/07448481.2020.1865380.
35.
MottaSara C.BennettAnna. 2018. “Pedagogies of Care, Care-Full Epistemological Practice and ‘Other’ Caring Subjectivities in Enabling Education.” Teaching in Higher Education23(5):631–46.
PrinceMichael. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education93(3):223–31.
38.
RapantaChrysiBotturiLucaGoodyearPeterGuàrdiaLourdesKooleMarguerite. 2020. “Online University Teaching during and after the COVID-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity.” Postdigital Science and Education2(3):923–45.
39.
RoachShoniqua. 2020. “On the Uses of Black Feminism: Notes on Black Feminism as Sexuality Study.” Feminist Formations32(1):180–88.
40.
RobinsonHeatherAl-FreihMahaKilgoreWhitney. 2020. “Designing with Care: Towards a Care-Centered Model for Online Learning Design.” International Journal of Information and Learning Technology37(3):99–108.
SalazarMaria del Carmen. 2013. “A Humanizing Pedagogy: Reinventing the Principles and Practice of Education as a Journey toward Liberation.” Review of Research in Education37(1):121–48.
43.
SambellKayMcDowellLizMontgomeryCatherine. 2012. Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
44.
SheltonCatharynAguileraEarlGleasonBenjaminMehtaRohit. 2020. “Resisting Dehumanizing Assessments: Enacting Critical Humanizing Pedagogies in Online Teacher Education.” Pp. 125–28 in Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field, edited by FerdigR. E.BaumgartnerE.HartshorneR.Kaplan-RakowskiR.MouzaC.Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
45.
SkylarAshley Ann. 2009. “A Comparison of Asynchronous Online Text-Based Lectures and Synchronous Interactive Web Conferencing Lectures.” Issues in Teacher Education18(2):69–84.
46.
SoriaKrista M.HorgosBonnieChirikovIgorJones-WhiteDaniel. 2020. First-Generation Students’ Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) Consortium. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/214934.
SuttonHalley. 2020. “COVID-19 Disproportionately Impacts Students with Disabilities across All Sectors.” Disability Compliance for Higher Education26(6):9.
49.
Van den BrandeLieve. 1992. Flexible and Distance Learning. New York: Wiley.
50.
VaughanNorman. D.2007. “Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education.” International Journal on E-Learning6(1):81–94.
51.
VaughanNorman. D.2010. “A Blended Community of Inquiry Approach: Linking Student Engagement and Course Redesign.” The Internet and Higher Education13(1):60–65.
52.
Walker-GleavesCaroline. 2019. “Is Caring Pedagogy Really So Progressive? Exploring the Conceptual and Practical Impediments to Operationalizing Care in Higher Education.” Pp. 93–112 in Higher Education and Hope, edited by GibbsP.PetersonA.Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
WannerThomasPalmerEdward. 2015. “Personalising Learning: Exploring Student and Teacher Perceptions about Flexible Learning and Assessment in a Flipped University Course.” Computers and Education88:354–69.
54.
WelkerJanBerardinoLisa. 2005. “Blended Learning: Understanding the Middle Ground between Traditional Classroom and Fully Online Instruction.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems34(1):33–55.
55.
WinkelmesMary-Ann. 2019. “Introduction: The Story of TILT and Its Emerging Uses in Higher Education.” Pp. 1–14 in Transparent Design in Higher Education Teaching and Leadership: A Guide to Implementing the Transparency Framework Institution-Wide to Improve Learning and Retention, edited by WinkelmesM.-A.BoyleA.TappS.Sterling, VA: Stylus.
