This article provides a critique and an addition to observations raised by Ballantine et al. in this issue. After reviewing the strengths of Ballantine et al.’s article about the need for a core in sociology, I argue that this debate has gone on long enough and needs to be reframed around areas of agreement. Three major curricular projects (that have already begun to move this discussion forward) are presented, including the American Sociological Association (ASA) High School National Standards; the ASA Task Force on Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major, Updated, Third Edition; and the Measuring College Learning (MCL) Project. A critical outcome of the MCL Project in sociology is the Sociological Literacy Framework, which is already changing conversations about sociology curricula and learning outcomes. The Sociological Literacy Framework is summarized, and use of this framework is discussed.
AbbottAndrew. 2000. “Reflections on the Future of Sociology.” Contemporary Sociology29(2):296–300.
2.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2011. Vision and Change in Undergraduate Education: A Call to Action. Final report. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
American Sociological Association. 2013. “Sociology Companion Document for the C3 Framework.” Pp. 73–76 in College, Career, and Civic Life: C3 Framework for Social Studies State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
American Sociological Association. 2015. “ASA National Standards for High School Sociology.” Washington, DC: Author.
6.
ArumRichardRoksaJosipa. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
ArumRichardRoksaJosipaCookAmanda. 2016. Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcomes and Assessments for the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
ASA Task Force on a College Level Introduction to Sociology Course. 2008. “College-level Sociology Curriculum for Introduction to Sociology.” ASA Introduction to Sociology website. Retrieved March13, 2015 (http://tinyurl.com/d8gtap5).
9.
Association of American Colleges. 1985. Integrity in the College Curriculum. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
AtkinsonMaxine P.LowneyKathleen S.2016. In the Trenches: Teaching and Learning Sociology. New York: Norton.
11.
BabbieEarl. 1990. “The Essential Wisdom of Sociology.” Teaching Sociology18(4):526–30.
12.
BainKen. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BallantineJeanneGreenwoodNancyHowardJay R.KainEdward L.PikeDianeSchwartzMichaelSmithR. TysonZippJohn F.2016. “Does the Center Hold? Reflections on a Sociological Core.” Teaching Sociology44(3):151–162.
14.
BerheideCatherine White. 2005. “Searching for Structure: Creating Coherence in the Sociology Curriculum.” Teaching Sociology33(1):1–15.
15.
BillsDavid. 2011. “Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses.” Teachers College Record. Retrieved August28, 2011 (http://www.tcrecord.org).
16.
CalderLendolSteffesTracy. 2016. “Measuring College Learning in History.” Pp. 37–86 in Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcomes and Assessments for the 21st Century, edited by ArumR.RoksaJ.CookA.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
CollinsRandall. 1998. “The Sociological Eye and Its Blinders.” Contemporary Sociology27(1):2–7.
18.
D’AntonioWilliam. 1983. “Nibbling at the Core.” Teaching Sociology10(2):169–85.
19.
DavisJames A.1983. “Five Well-established Research Results That I Think Are Probably True, Teachable in Introductory Sociology, and Worth Teaching.” Teaching Sociology10(2):186–209.
20.
De WeldeKris. 2015. “When Sociology Is on the Chopping Block: Demonstrating Departmental Value in the Face of External Threats.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 21, Chicago.
DunnDana S.McCarthyMaureen A.BakerSuzanne C.HalonenJane S.2011. Using Quality Benchmarks for Assessing and Developing Undergraduate Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
EriksonKai, ed. 1997. “Prologue: Sociology as a Perspective.” Pp. 3–16 in Sociological Visions. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
FarkasGeorge. 2011. “Book Review ofAcademically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses.” American Journal of Sociology117(3):1000–1002.
26.
FergusonSusan J.CarbonaroWilliam. 2016. “Measuring College Learning in Sociology.” Pp. 135–87 in Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcomes and Assessments for the 21st Century, edited by ArumR.RoksaJ.CookA.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
GoldsmidCharles A.WilsonEverett K.1980. Passing on Sociology: The Teaching of a Discipline. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
28.
GreenwoodNancy A.HowardJay R.2011. First Contact: Teaching and Learning in Introductory Sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
29.
GreenwoodNancy A.JenkinsCarol A.PikeDiane. 2014. “Toward Developing a Core Content in Introductory Sociology: Ideas for Building Consensus within the Discipline.” Paper presented at the Midwest Sociological Society Meetings, April 3–6, Omaha, NE.
30.
HowardJay R.2010. “Where Are We and How Did We Get Here? A Brief Examination of the Past, Present, and Future of the Teaching and Learning Movement in Sociology.” Teaching Sociology38(2):81–92.
31.
HowardJay R.NovakKatherineClineKrista M. C.ScottMarvin B.2014. “Another Nibble at the Core: Student Learning in a Thematically-focused Introductory Sociology Course.” Teaching Sociology42(3):177–86.
32.
JenkinsCarol. A.2014. “The ‘Core’: Introduction to Sociology at a Community College.” Paper presented at the Midwest Sociological Society Meetings, April 3–6, Omaha, NE.
33.
Kain, Ed. 2013. Handout from “Teaching the Core of Sociology—or Not! What Should Introductory Students Know?” ASA Annual Meeting, August 9–12, New York.
34.
KeithBruceEnderMorten G.2004a. “Core, What Core? Looking beyond the Introductory Textbook of Answers.” Teaching Sociology32(1):39–40.
35.
KeithBruceEnderMorten G.2004b. “The Sociological Core: Conceptual Patterns and Idiosyncrasies in the Structure and Content of Introductory Sociology Textbooks, 1940–2000.” Teaching Sociology32(1):19–36.
36.
KeithBruceGreenwoodNancy A.HampeGaryHartmanHarrietHoweryCarla B.JenkinsCarolKaufmanGayleMeiksinsPeterReitzesDonaldRossSusanSwansonDebraWhiteDeborah. 2007. Sociology and General Education. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
37.
LenskiGerhard. 1983. “Rethinking the Introductory Sociology Course.” Teaching Sociology10(2):153–68.
38.
Liberal Education and America’s Promise. 2015. “LEAP at a Glance Handout.” Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
39.
McConnellKathryne Drezek. 2011. “Book Review:Academically Adrift.” Research and Practice in Assessment6:40–42.
40.
McKinneyKathleenHoweryCarla B.StrandKerry J.KainEdward L.BerheideCatherine White. 2004. Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major Updated: Meeting the Challenge of Teaching Sociology in the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
41.
PallasAaron M.2011. “Assessing the Future of Higher Education.” Symposium on Academically Adrift. Sociology48:213–15.
PersellCaroline HodgesPfeifferKathryn M.SyedAli. 2007. “What Should Students Understand after Taking Introduction to Sociology?”Teaching Sociology35(4):300–14.
44.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. 2007. United Kingdom Quality Assurance for Higher Ed Sociology. Gloucester, UK: Southgate House.
45.
SchwartzMichaelSmithR. Tyson. 2010. “Beyond the Core: The Hot Topic(al) Alternative to the Survey-based Introduction to Sociology Course.” American Sociologist41(3):249–76.
46.
SweetStephenMcElrathKevinKainEdward L.2014. “The Coordinated Curriculum: How Institutional Theory Can Be Used to Catalyze Revision of the Sociology Major.” Teaching Sociology42(4):287–97.
47.
The Australian Sociological Association. 2012. Sociology: Threshold Learning Outcomes. Hawthorne, Australia: Author.
48.
WagenaarTheodore C.1991. “Goals for the Discipline?”Teaching Sociology19(1):92–95.
49.
WagenaarTheodore C.2004. “Is There a Core in Sociology: Results from a Survey.” Teaching Sociology32(1):1–18.
