In this article, we describe a way to encourage students to envision “real utopias” through the Global Village experience at the Heifer Ranch in Arkansas. The Global Village experience introduces participants to issues associated with global hunger, poverty, environmental sustainability, and resource consumption and provides opportunities to experience simulated poverty and resource inequality. Using student journals recorded during the experience and participant observation, we demonstrate how students’ learning is enhanced by temporarily living outside their typical comfort zones and closer to the global averages of consumption. We find that the Global Village experience is an effective and unique tool for engaging students in global and transnational issues and for encouraging students to imagine other possible worlds.
ArabandiBhavaniSweetStephenSwordsAlicia. 2014. “Testing the Flat World Thesis Using a Public Dataset to Engage Students in the Global Inequality Debate.” Teaching Sociology42(4):267–76.
BlockFredSomersMargaret R.2014. The Power of Market Fundamentalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BonwellCharles C.EisonJames A.1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washington, DC: George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
5.
BowlesSamuelGintisHerbert. 1998. Recasting Egalitarianism: New Rules for Communities, States and Markets. London: Verso.
6.
DouglasCeasarJones-RikkersCatherine G.2001. “Study Abroad Programs and American Student Worldmindedness.” Journal of Teaching in International Business13(1):55–66.
7.
FobesCatherine. 2005. “Taking a Critical Pedagogical Look at Travel-study Abroad: ‘A Classroom with a View’ in Cusco, Peru.” Teaching Sociology33(2):181–94.
8.
GeorgeSusan. 2004. Another World Is Possible if. . . . London: Verso.
9.
HarrisDeborah A.HarrisWhitney M.FondrenKristi M.2015. “Everybody Eats: Using Hunger Banquets to Teach about Issues of Global Hunger and Inequality.” Teaching Sociology43(2):115–25.
10.
HayekFriedrich A.1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.
11.
HayekFriedrich A.1948. Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge.
12.
Heifer International. 2014. Heifer Ranch: Global Gateway Participant Information. Little Rock, AK: Heifer International.
13.
HoopKatrina C.2012. “Comte Unplugged: Using a ‘Technology Fast’ to Teach Sociological Theory.” Teaching Sociology40(2):158–65.
ScarboroAllen. 2004. “Bringing Theory Closer to Home through Active Learning and Online Discussion.” Teaching Sociology32(2):222–31.
20.
SenAmartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
SohoniDeeneshPetrovicMisha. 2010. “Teaching a Global Sociology: Suggestions for Globalizing the U.S. Curriculum.” Teaching Sociology38(4):287–300.
22.
SteckLaura WestEnglerJennifer N.LigonMaryDruenPerri B.CosgroveErin. 2011. “Doing Poverty: Learning Outcomes among Students Participating in the Community Action Poverty Simulation Program.” Teaching Sociology39(3):259–73.
23.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1974. The Modern World-system I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
24.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1980. The Modern World-system II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-economy, 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press.
25.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1989. The Modern World-system III: The Second Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-economy, 1730–1840’s. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
WallersteinImmanuel. 2011. The Modern World-system IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
World Values Survey. 2014. Wave 6 2010–2014 Official Aggregate V.20140429. Madrid, Spain: Asep/JDS [Aggregate File Producer]. Available from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
28.
WrightErik Olin. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.
29.
WrightErik Olin. 2013. “Transforming Capitalism through Real Utopias.” American Sociological Review78(1):1–25.
