This article discusses pedagogical exercises developed to help students appreciate the power of sociological perspectives as they seek to better understand their own lives and the world around them. The assignments are focused on fulfilling the particular course learning goal that highlights student mastery of the application of diverse theoretical perspectives in societal analysis. The article offers a brief overview of how theoretical thinking is introduced in the classroom and continues with a discussion of particular assignments used to promote student engagement and understanding: the preparation of a letter to a theorist, the creation of a poster to visually represent the life and ideas of a theorist, and the writing and performance of a play “starring” theorists studied in class. The article concludes with a discussion of the issues of assessment and student learning and a consideration of how these assignments may benefit student learners both within and outside of sociology.
AdornoTheodore. 2001. The Culture Industry. New York: Routledge.
2.
American Sociological Association. 2006. “‘What Can I Do with a Bachelor’s Degree in Sociology?’ A National Survey of Seniors Majoring in Sociology.” Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Retrieved August 1, 2009 (http://www.asanet.org/research/bacc_survey.cfm).
3.
AppelrouthScottEdlesLaura Desfor. 2008. Classical and Contemporary Sociological Theory: Text and Readings. Los Angeles, CA: Pine Forge Press.
4.
BaumanZygmunt. 2000. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BrownDavid. 2003. “Goffman’s Dramaturgical Sociology: Developing a Meaningful Theoretical Context and Exercise Involving ‘Embarrassment and Social Organization.’” Teaching Sociology31(3):288-99.
7.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Rev. 10th anniversary ed.New York: Routledge.
8.
DahrendorfRalf. 1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
DavisKingsleyMooreWilbert. 1945. “Some Principles of Stratification.” American Sociological Review10(2):242-49.
10.
DelaneyTim. 2005. Contemporary Social Theory: Investigation and Application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
11.
DonaghyMary L.2000. “Simulating Television Programs as a Tool to Teach Social Theory.” Teaching Sociology28(1):67-70.
12.
GansHerbert. 1972. “The Positive Functions of Poverty.” American Journal of Sociology78(2):275-89.
13.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
14.
GramsciAntonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and translated by HoareQ.SmithG. N.New York: International.
15.
HaleSylvia. 1995. “First-Year Sociology: The Importance of Theory.” Teaching Sociology23(1):48-52.
16.
HardyTim. 1989. “Toward a Critical Pedagogy in Sociology through the Use of Drama.” Teaching Sociology17(2):226-31.
17.
HellerRachelle S.BeilCherylDamKimHaerumBelinda. Forthcoming. “Student and Faculty Perceptions of Engagement in Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education.
18.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
HoltzmanMellisa. 2005. “Teaching Sociological Theory through Active Learning: The Irrigation Exercise.” Teaching Sociology33(2):206-12.
20.
KuhGeorge D.LairdThomas F. NelsonUmbackPaul D.2004. “Aligning Faculty Activities and Student Behavior.” Liberal Education90(Fall):24-31.
21.
LevyDonald P.MerensteinBeth. 2005. “Working with Stories: An Active Learning Approach to Theories of Deviance.” Teaching Sociology33(1):66-73.
22.
LippmanStephenAldrichHoward. 2003. “The Rationalization of Everything? Using Ritzer’s McDonaldization Thesis to Teach Weber.” Teaching Sociology31(2):134-45.
23.
LowneyKathleen S.1998. “Reducing ‘Theory Anxiety’ through Puzzles.” Teaching Sociology26(1):69-73.
24.
MarcuseHerbert. [1964] 2006. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. New York: Routledge.
25.
MarxKarl. [1867] 1967. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. 3 vols. New York: International.
26.
MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich. [1848] 1983. “The Manifesto of the Communist Party.” Pp. 98-137 in Selected Works in Three Volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). 2008. “Promoting Engagement for All Students: The Imperative to Look Within—2008 Results.” Retrieved January 2009 (http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2008_Results/index.cfm).
30.
ParsonsTalcott. 1954. “The Kinship System of the Contemporary United States.” Pp. 189-94 in Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press.
31.
RitzerGeorge. 1999. Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
32.
RitzerGeorge. 2000. The McDonaldization of Society: New Century Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
33.
RitzerGeorge. 2007. Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
34.
ScarboroAllen. 2004. “Bringing Theory Closer to Home through Active Learning and Online Discussion.” Teaching Sociology32(2):222-31.
35.
SmithDorothy. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
36.
SmithDorothy. 1990. Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
37.
WallaceRuthWolfAlison. 2006. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition. 6th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
