Quantitative and computer literacy are increasingly recognized as core components of a liberal education in sociology. This study draws on student, faculty, and alumni questionnaires to identify the kinds of quantitative literacy skills that are perceived to be most critical for students enrolled in sociology courses. Respondents at Lehman College highlighted the need for proficiencies in a number of key areas, including (a) basic mathematical and statistical skills, such as measures of central tendency, ratios, and percentages; (b) the presentation and interpretation of quantitative data, including tables and charts; (c) the research process, such as developing hypotheses, sampling, and interpreting data; and (d) computer-based presentation and data analysis, including the use of software programs such as SPSS and Excel. Moreover, hands-on work in data analysis was highly valued by all respondents, particularly as a strategy for mastering these skills. This study suggests that effective education in quantitative literacy requires both (a) the removal of barriers to the incorporation of data analysis in sociology courses and (b) a well-sequenced sociology curriculum that pinpoints specific quantitative and computer literacy learning objectives at multiple course levels.
Alter, George, Sue Hodge, Lynette F. Hoelter, and Flora McMartin.2009. ‘‘QL Rubric Including Modified Learning Outcomes.’’ Unpublished manuscript.
2.
American Association of Community Colleges.2009. ‘‘Fast Facts.’’ Retrieved June 25, 2009 (http://www.aacc.nche.edu/AboutCC/Pages/fastfacts.aspx ).
3.
American Sociological Association.2005. ‘‘Integrating Data Analysis into the Curriculum.’’ Retrieved August 10, 2007 (http://www.asanet.org/cs/root/topnav/sociology_depts/a_brief_summary_of_the_integrating_data_analysis_project_ida ).
4.
Association of American Colleges and Universities.2009. ‘‘Spring 2009 Draft for Public Release of Quantitative Literacy VALUE Rubric.’’Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities .
5.
Bills, David R. and Anthony Q. Stanley.2001. ‘‘Social Science Computer Labs as Sites for Teaching and Learning: Challenges and Solutions in their Design and Maintenance.’’Teaching Sociology29(2):153-62.
6.
Blalock, Hubert M., Jr.1989. ‘‘The Real and Unrealized Contributions of Quantitative Sociology.’’American Sociological Review54(3):447-60.
7.
Bridges, George S., Gerald M. Gillmore, Jana L. Pershing, and Kristin A. Bates .1998. ‘‘Teaching Quantitative Research Methods: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.’’Teaching Sociology26(1):14-28.
8.
City University of New York Office of Institutional Research and Assessment . 2006. 2006 Student Experience Survey. Retrieved June 24, 2009 (http://owl.cuny.edu:7778/portal/page/portal/oira/OIRA_HOME/std.exp.survey.2006.pdf).
9.
Clifton, A. Key.1976. ‘‘Doin Soc: An Evaluation of Actively Involving Introductory Students in the World of Sociology.’’Teaching Sociology3(2):138-47.
10.
Conklin, George H.1978. ‘‘The Frustration of Academic Innovation: Can New Teaching Techniques Survive in the Academic Marketplace?’’Teaching Sociology5(2):125-40.
11.
Cuban, Larry.2001. ‘‘Encouraging Progressive Pedagogy.’’ Pp. 87-91 in Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, edited by L. A. Steen.Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines .
12.
Díaz De Rada, Vidal.2005. ‘‘The Effect of Follow-up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys.’’Quality & Quantity39(1):1-18.
13.
Fox, Richard J., Melvin R. Crask, and Jonghoon Kim .1988. ‘‘Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-analysis of Selecting Techniques for Inducing Response.’’Public Opinion Quarterly52(4):467-91.
14.
Frey, William H. and Cheryl L. First. N.d. ‘‘Bringing Census Data into the Classroom: World Wide Web Access and Teacher Networking.’’ Unpublished manuscript.
15.
Fuller, Theodore D.1998. ‘‘Using Computer Assignments to Promote Active Learning in the Undergraduate Social Problems Course.’’Teaching Sociology26(3):215-21.
16.
Grauerholz, Liz and Greg Gibson.2006. ‘‘Articulation of Goals and Means in Sociology Courses: What We Can Learn from Syllabi.’’ Teaching Sociology34(1):5-22.
17.
Himes, Christine L. and Christine Caffrey.2003. ‘‘Linking Social Gerontology with Quantitative Skills: A Class Project Using U.S. Census Data.’’Teaching Sociology31(1):85-94.
18.
Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities.2009. ‘‘HACU Member Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs).’’ Retrieved June 25, 2009 (http://www.hacu.net/assnfe/CompanyDirectory.asp?STYLE=2&COMPANY_TYPE=1,5).
19.
Howery, Carla B.2001. ‘‘Promoting Undergraduate Research in Sociology.’’Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly21(4):163-67.
20.
---. and Havidan Rodriguez.2006. ‘‘Integrating Data Analysis (IDA): Working with Sociology Departments to Address the Quantitative Literacy Gap.’’Teaching Sociology34(1):23-38.
21.
James, Jeannine M. and Richard Bolstein.1990. ‘‘The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Follow-up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys.’’Public Opinion Quarterly54(3):346-61.
22.
Johnson, Yvette Nicole and Jennifer J. Kaplan. N.d. ‘‘Assessing the Quantitative Literacy of Students at a Large Public Research University.’’ Unpublished manuscript.
23.
Kain, Edward L.1999. ‘‘Building the Sociological Imagination through a Cumulative Curriculum: Professional Socialization in Sociology.’’Teaching Sociology27(1):1-16.
24.
Karp, David R.1995. ‘‘Using SPSS for Windows to Enhance, Not Overwhelm, Course Content.’’Teaching Sociology23(3):234-40.
25.
King, Kim M.1994. ‘‘Leading Classroom Discussions: Using Computers for a New Approach.’’Teaching Sociology22(2):174-82.
26.
Lagerlöf, Johan and Andrew Seltzer.2008. ‘‘Do Remedial Mathematics Courses Help Economics Students?’’ VoxEU.org. Retrieved June23, 2009 (http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/1526).
27.
Lehman College Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment. 2006. Lehman College 2006 Fact Book. Retrieved August 14, 2007 (http://www.lehman.edu/provost/provostoffice/oir.htm ).
Madison, Bernard L.2003. ‘‘The Many Faces of Quantitative Literacy.’’ Pp. 3-6 in Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges, edited by B. L. Madison and L. A. Steen.Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
30.
Markham, William T.1991. ‘‘Research Methods in the Introductory Course: To Be or Not to Be?’’Teaching Sociology19(4):464-71.
31.
McKinney, Kathleen, Carla B. Howery, Kerry J. Strand, Edward L. Kain, and Catherine White Berheide.2004. Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major Updated: Meeting the Challenge of Teaching Sociology in the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
32.
Misra, Joya.1997. ‘‘Teaching Stratification: Stimulating Interest and Critical Thinking through Research Projects.’’ Teaching Sociology25(4):278-91.
33.
Nederhof, Anton.1983. ‘‘Effects of Repetition and Consistency of Personalization Treatments on Response Rates in Mail Surveys. ’’ Social Science Research12(1):1-9.
34.
Persell, Caroline Hodges.1992. ‘‘Bringing PCs into Introductory Sociology Courses: First Steps, Missteps, and Future Prospects.’’Teaching Sociology20(2):91-103.
35.
Pozo, Susan and Charles A. Stull.2006. ‘‘Requiring a Math Skills Unit: Results of a Randomized Experiment.’’American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings96(2):437-41.
36.
Raymondo, James C.1996. ‘‘Developing a Computer Laboratory for Undergraduate Sociology Courses.’’Teaching Sociology24(3):305-09.
37.
Reed-Sanders, Delores and Steve Liebowitz.1991. ‘‘An Empirical Test of Integration of Computers in Introductory Sociology.’’ Teaching Sociology19(2):223-30.
38.
Scheel, Elizabeth D.2002. ‘‘Using Active Learning Projects to Teach Research Skills throughout the Sociology Curriculum.’’Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology4(2):145-70.
39.
Scheitle, Christopher P.2006. ‘‘Web-based Data Analysis: Creating a Sociological Laboratory.’’Teaching Sociology34(1):80-86.
40.
Steen, Lynn Arthur.2004. ‘‘Everything I Needed to Know about Averages I Learned in College.’’Peer Review6(4):4-8.
41.
Sweet, Stephen and Kerry Strand.2006. ‘‘Cultivating Quantitative Literacy: The Role of Sociology.’’ Teaching Sociology34(1):1-4.
42.
Wilder, Esther Isabelle.2009. ‘‘Responding to the Quantitative Literacy Gap among Students in Sociology Courses.’’Teaching Sociology37(2):151-70.
43.
Wright, Eric R. and Anthony H. Lawson.2005. ‘‘Computer Mediated Communication and Student Learning in Large Introductory Sociology Classes.’’Teaching Sociology33(2):122-35.
44.
Wolfe, Christopher R.1993. ‘‘Quantitative Reasoning across a College Curriculum.’’College Teaching41(1):3-9.
45.
Ziegler, Stephen J.2006. ‘‘Increasing Response Rates in Mail Surveys without Increasing Error.’’Criminal Justice Policy Review17(1):22-31.
