Meaning in Life Mediates the Relationship Between Intrinsic Religious Orientation and Life Satisfaction

Abstract

Religious orientations, such as intrinsic (IRO), extrinsic (ERO), and quest (QRO), may influence individuals’ sense of meaning in life and life satisfaction. This study examined these relationships among 392 Spanish Catholic undergraduates using the Religious Orientation Scale, Purpose in Life-10 Items, and Satisfaction with Life Scale. Correlational analyses showed that IRO was positively related to both meaning in life and life satisfaction, while ERO showed no significant relationships, and QRO was linked to life satisfaction but not meaning in life. Mediation analysis using bootstrapping indicated that meaning in life significantly mediated the relationship between IRO and life satisfaction. These findings suggest that intrinsic religiosity enhances life satisfaction by fostering a sense of meaning, highlighting the importance of cultural context in understanding the pathways from religiosity to well-being.

Keywords

intrinsic religiosity life satisfaction meaning in life mediation analysis religious orientation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abeyta

A. A.

Blake

E. N.

(2020). The existential implications of individual differences in religious defensive and growth orientations: Fundamentalism, quest religiosity, and intrinsic/extrinsic religiosity. In Vail

K. E.

Routledge

(Eds.), The science of religion, spirituality, and existentialism (pp. 351–357). Academic Press.

Aghababaei

Błachnio

(2014). Purpose in life mediates the relationship between religiosity and happiness: Evidence from Poland. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17(8), 827–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.928850

Allport

G. W.

(1950). The individual and his religion. Macmillan.

Allport

G. W.

Ross

J. M.

(1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212

Arce

(1994) Técnicas de Construcción de Escalas Psicológicas [Techniques for the Construction of Psychological Scales]. Síntesis.

Batson

C. D.

(1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384312

Batson

C. D.

Schoenrade

P. A.

(1991a). Measuring religion as Quest: I. Validity concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(4), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387277

Batson

C. D.

Schoenrade

P. A.

(1991b). Measuring religion as Quest: II. Reliability concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(4), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387278

Batson

C. D.

Schoenrade

Ventis

W. L.

(1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.

10.

Batson

C. D.

Ventis

W. L.

(1982)The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.

11.

Batson

C. D.

Ventis

W. L.

(1985). Misconception of quest: A reply to Hood and Morris. Review of Religious Research, 26, 398–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511053

12.

Błażek

Besta

(2012). Self-concept clarity and religious orientations: Prediction of purpose in life and self-esteem. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(3), 947–960. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41653880

13.

Campos

Bredemeier

Trentini

(2020). Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between intrinsic religiosity and depression symptoms. Trends in Psychology, 28, 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-020-00036-0

14.

Cook

D. B.

McDaniel

M. G.

Doyle-Portillo

S. M.

(2018). Taking religion to heart: The relationship between the five factor model and the New Indices of Religious Orientation among religious students. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 39(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2018.1429172

15.

Cook

K. V.

Leonard

K. C.

Kimball

C. N.

Boyatzis

C. J.

(2014). The complexity of quest in emerging adults’ religiosity, well-being, and identity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(1), 73–89. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24644205

16.

Crumbaugh

J. C.

Maholick

L. T.

(1969). Purpose in Life Test (PIL) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01175-000

17.

Diener

E. D.

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

18.

Doane

Elliott

Dyrenforth

(2013). Extrinsic religious orientation and well-being: Is their negative association real or spurious? Review of Religious Research, 56(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-013-0137-y

19.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

20.

Flere

Edwards

K. J.

Klanjsek

(2008). Religious orientation in three Central European Environments: Quest, intrinsic, and extrinsic dimensions. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610701719280

21.

García-Alandete

Bernabé

(2013). Religious orientation and psychological well-being among Spanish undergraduates. Acción Psicológica, 10(1), 133–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.1.7040

22.

García-Alandete

Rosa

Sellés

(2013). Estructura factorial y consistencia interna de una versión española del Purpose-In-Life Test [Factorial structure and internal consistency of a Spanish version of the Purpose-In-Life Test]. Universitas Psychologica, 12(2), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY12-2.efci

23.

García-Alandete

Rubio-Belmonte

Soucase-Lozano

(2019). The religious orientation scale revised among Spanish Catholic people: Structural validity and internal consistency of a 21-item model. Universitas Psychologica, 18(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-3.rosr

24.

Gaston-Breton

Lemoine

J. E.

Voyer

B. G.

Kastanakis

M. N.

(2021). Pleasure, meaning or spirituality: Cross-Cultural differences in orientations to happiness across 12 countries. Journal of Business Research, 134, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.013

25.

Gebauer

J. E.

Sedikides

(2021). Cultural religiosity: A neglected but powerful dimension of culture. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.027

26.

Gorsuch

R. L.

McPherson

S. E.

(1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28(3), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386745

27.

Hayes

A. F.

(2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Vol. 3). Guilford Press.

28.

Hichy

Di Marco

Sciacca

(2019). Dataset on the relations between religious and secular attitudes. Data in Brief, 28, 104925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104925

29.

Hill

P. C.

Hood

R. W.

Jong

Harris

K. A.

(Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity and spirituality. Springer.

30.

IBM Corp. (2022). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 29.0 [Computer software]. IBM Corp.

31.

Kashdan

T. B.

Steger

M. F.

(2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9068-7

32.

Koenig

H. G.

(2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 278730. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730

33.

Kumar

Pandey

Ansari

Yadav

J. P.

(2023). Diversity of religious traditions: Understanding religious diversity and diversity of religious experiences. Shodh Drishti, 9(1), 116–124.

34.

A. Y. C.

Liu

J. K. K.

(2023). Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity on well-being through meaning in life and its gender difference among adolescents in Hong Kong: A mediation study. Current Psychology, 42, 7171–7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02006-w

35.

Maltby

(1999). The internal structure of a derived, revised, and amended measure of the Religious Orientation Scale: The “Age-Universal” IE Scale-12. Social Behavior and Personality, 27(4), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1999.27.4.407

36.

Maltby

Day

(2003). Religious orientation, religious coping and appraisals of stress: Assessing primary appraisal factors in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(7), 1209–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00110-1

37.

Paloutzian

R. F.

Park

C. L.

(Eds.). (2013). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

38.

Park

C. J.

Yoo

S.-K.

(2016). Meaning in life and its relationships with intrinsic religiosity, deliberate rumination, and emotional regulation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(4), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12151

39.

Park

C. L.

(2020). Religiousness and meaning making following stressful life events. In Vail

K. E.

Routledge

(Eds.), The science of religion, spirituality, and existentialism (pp. 273–285). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817204-9.00020-2

40.

Salsman

J. M.

Brown

T. L.

Brechting

E. H.

Carlson

C. R.

(2005). The link between religion and spirituality and psychological adjustment: The mediating role of optimism and social support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 522–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271563

41.

Steger

M. F.

(2006). An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_03

42.

Steger

M. F.

Frazier

(2005). Meaning in life: One link in the chain from religiousness to well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.574

43.

Van Cappellen

Toth-Gauthier

Saroglou

Fredrickson

B. L

. (2016). Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9605-5

44.

Villani

Eissa

Zambelli

Di Natale

A. F.

(2025). Religiously grounded character and its association with subjective well-being in emerging adults: A latent profile analysis. Religions, 16(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020106

45.

Watts

Bretherton

(2017). “Religion” is complex and diverse. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249930

46.

Weber

M. C.

Furman

Schulenberg

S. E.

(2022). A Spanish adaptation and validation of the Purpose in Life Test-Short Form (PIL-SF). PSOCIAL, 8(1), 1–20. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=672371222012

47.

Wielenberg

E. J.

(2022). Atheism and meaning in life. In Landau

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of meaning in life (pp. 216–228). Oxford University Press.

48.

Williams

(2020). Religion and the meaning of life: An existential approach. Cambridge University Press.

49.

Wixwat

Saucier

(2021). Being spiritual but not religious. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.003

50.

Woyciechowski

(2007). The relationship between intrinsic/extrinsic religiosity and meaning in life [Doctoral dissertation, Rowan University]. Rowan Digital Works. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/884

51.

Yaden

D. B.

Batz-Barbarich

C. L.

Vaziri

Gladstone

J. N.

Pawelski

J. O.

Tay

(2022). A meta-analysis of religion/spirituality and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(8), 4147–4163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00558-7

52.

You

Lim

S. A.

(2019). Religious orientation and subjective well-being: The mediating role of meaning in life. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 47(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091647118795180