We introduce a new instrument, called the Practicing Faith Survey (PFS), to assess faith formation among students in K-12 Christian schools. We begin by describing the conceptual and theological background of the PFS, underscoring the ways it differs from existing instruments of faith formation because of its particular focus on Christian practice within the context of learning and the vocation of the student. We then describe the procedures behind developing the PFS and its five domains: Intellectual, Relational, Introspective, Beneficent, and Formational Practices. We then provide evidence of validity and reliability based on a pilot study that involved 1,200 US and Australian Christian school students in fifth through 12th grades. We conclude with recommendations about how Christian school educators, students, and parents can use the PFS in practice.
AllemanN. F.GlanzerP. L.GuthrieD. S. (2016). The integration of Christian theological traditions into the classroom: A survey of CCCU faculty. Christian Scholar’s Review, 45(2), 103–124.
2.
ArtinoA. R.La RochelleJ. S.DezeeK. J.GehlbachH. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 463–474.
3.
AstleyJ. (2018). The naming of parts: Faith, formation, development and education. In Stuart-ButtleR.ShorttJ. (Eds.), Christian faith, formation and education (pp. 13–27). Springer Nature.
4.
BaumsteigerR.SiegelJ. T. (2018). Measuring prosociality: The development of a prosocial behavioral intentions scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 11(3), 305–314.
5.
BehrJ. (2016). Intellectual virtues and education: Essays in Applied Virtue Epistemology. Routledge.
6.
BoultonM. M. (2010). Study. In BassD. C.BriehlS. R. (Eds.), On our way: Christian practices for living a whole life (pp. 19–35). Upper Room Books.
7.
BradfieldG. (2014). Growing Disciples Inventory (GDI) for self-assessment of Christian spiritual development. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 23(2), 130–153.
8.
BramerP. (2010). Introduction to the special focus: Spiritual formation and Christian education. Christian Education Journal, 7(2), 334–339.
9.
BungeM. J. (2011). “Best practices” for nurturing the best love of and by children: A Protestant theological perspective on the vocations of children and parents. In JacksonT. P. (Ed.), The best love of the child: Being loved and being taught to love as the first human right (pp. 226–250). Eerdmans.
10.
CahalanK. A.SchuurmanD. J. (2016). Calling in today’s world: Voices from eight faith perspectives. Eerdmans.
11.
CalhounR. (1954). Christian vocation on the college campus. The Christian Scholar, 37, 270–279.
12.
CarlsonL. E.BrownK. W. (2005). Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58, 29–33.
13.
CASEL. (2005). Safe and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence-based social and emotional learning programs—Illinois edition.
14.
ChengA. (2020). Meditations on “Meditation in a Toolshed”: What C.S. Lewis can teach educators about data usage. Research in Brief, 2(1), 11–13.
15.
ChengA.SikkinkD. (2020). What do they deliver? A report on American colleges and universities. Cardus.
16.
ChengA.TrivittJ. R.WolfP. J. (2016). School choice and the branding of Milwaukee private schools. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 362–375.
17.
DavisD. E.RiceK.McElroyS.DeBlaereC.ChoeE.Van TongerenD. R.HookJ. N. (2015). Distinguishing intellectual humility and general humility. The Journal of Personal Psychology, 11(3), 215–224.
18.
DavisM. H. (1983). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51(2), 167–184.
19.
DeVellisR. F.ThorpeC. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and application. SAGE.
FeenstraJ. S.BrouwerA. M. (2008). Christian vocation: Defining relations with identity status, college adjustment, and spirituality. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 36(2), 83–93.
22.
GehlbachH.BrinkworthM. E. (2011). Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 380–387.
23.
GehlbachH.BrinkworthM. E.WangM.-T. (2012). The social perspective taking process: What motivates individuals to take another’s perspective?Teachers College Record, 114(1), 197–225.
24.
GlennonF.JacobsenD.JacobsenR. H.ThatamanilJ. J.PorterfieldA.MooreM. E. (2011). Formation in the classroom. Teaching Theology and Religion, 14(4), 357–381.
25.
GreenB. (2016). Entrances, exits: Christian education and the future. International Journal of Christianity and Education, 20(3), 181–185.
26.
HallT. W. K. J.Edwards, . (1996.). The initial development and factor analysis of the Spiritual Assessment Inventory. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 24(3), 233–246.
27.
HoranA. P. (2017). Fostering spiritual formation of millennials in Christian schools. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 26(1), 56–77.
28.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102–138.
29.
JosephS.DiducaD. (2007). The Dimensions of Religiosity Scale: 20-item self-report measure of religious preoccupation, guidance, conviction, and emotional involvement. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 10(6), 603–608.
30.
KarabenickS. A.WoolleyM. E.FriedelJ. M.AmmonB. V.BlazevskiJ.BonneyC. R.KellyK. L. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean?Educational Psychologist, 42, 139–151.
31.
KashdanT. B.StiksmaM. C.DisabatoD. J.McKnightP. E.BekierJ.KajiJ.LazarusR. (2017). The Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149.
32.
KrosnickJ. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567.
33.
Krumrei-MancusoE. J.RouseS. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221.
34.
LeclercqJ. (1982). The love of learning and the desire for God: A study of monastic culture. Fordham University Press.
35.
LitmanJ. A.SpielbergerC. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75–86.
36.
LynnM. L.NaughtonM. J.VanderVeenS. (2011). Connecting religion and work: Patterns and influences of work-faith integration. Human Relations, 64(5), 675–701.
37.
McCoachD. B.GableR. K.MaduraJ. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain. School and corporate applications. Springer.
38.
Miller-McLemoreB. J. (2017). Childhood: The (often hidden yet lively) vocational life of children. In CahalanK. A.Miller-McLemoreB. J. (Eds.), Calling all years good: Christian vocation throughout life’s seasons (pp. 38–62). Eerdmans.
39.
OpitzD.MellebyD. (2007). The outrageous idea of academic faithfulness: A guide for students. Brazos Press.
40.
PlantingaC. (2002). Engaging God’s world: A Christian vision of faith, learning, and living. Eerdmans.
41.
PorterS. L.SandageS. J.WangD. C.HillP. C. (2019). Measuring the spiritual, character, and moral formation of seminarians: In search of a meta-theory of spiritual change. Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care, 12, 5–24.
42.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. Routledge.
43.
RobitschekC. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(4), 183–198.
44.
SchreinerL. A. (2018). What good is Christian higher education?Christian Higher Education, 17(1-2), 33–49.
45.
SchuurmanD. J. (2004). Vocation: Discerning our callings in life. Eerdmans.
46.
SikkinkD. (2012). Religious school differences in school climate and academic mission: A descriptive overview of school organisation and student outcomes. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, 6(1), 20–39.
47.
SikkinkD. (2019). Evangelical protestant high schools: From inner faith to community. In HunterJ. D.OlsenR. (Eds.), The content of their character (pp. 87–110). Finstock & Tew.
48.
SmithD. I. (2018). On Christian teaching: Practicing faith in the classroom. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
49.
SmithD. I.GreenB.KurkechianM.ChengA. (2021). Assessing Christian learning: Towards a practices-based approach to faith, vocation, and assessment. International Journal of Christianity and Education, 25, 151–168.
50.
SmithD. I.SevensmaK.TerpstraM.McMullenS. (2020). Digital life together: The changing landscape of Christian schools. Eerdmans.
51.
SmithD. I.SmithJ. K. A. (2011). Introduction: Practices, faith, and pedagogy. In SmithD.SmithJ. K. A. (Eds.), Teaching and Christian practices: Reshaping faith and learning (pp. 1–23). Eerdmans.
52.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R.CairneyJ. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press.
53.
SullivanJ. L.MarcusG. E.FeldmanS.PiersonJ. E. (1981). The sources of political tolerance: A multivariate analysis. American Political Science Review, 75(1), 92–106.
54.
TavakolM.DennickR. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
55.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.
56.
TurpinK. (2017). Adolescence: Vocation in performance, passion, and possibility. In CahalanK. A.Miller-McLemoreB. J. (Eds.), Calling All Years Good: Christian Vocation Throughout Life’s Seasons (pp. 67–91). Eerdmans.
57.
VillageA.FrancisL. J. (2016). The development of the Francis Moral Values Scales: A study among 16- to 18-year-old students taking Religious Studies at A level in the UK. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 37, 347–356.
58.
VossK. E.StemD. E.FotopoulosS. A. (2000). Comment on the relationship between coefficient alpha and scale characteristics. Marketing Letters, 11, 177–191.
59.
VossenH. G. M.PiotrowskiJ. T.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). Development of adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 66–71.
60.
YeagerD. S.HendersonM. D.PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.D’MelloS.SpitzerB. J.DuckworthA. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559–580.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
