Christian psychologists’ contributions to understanding love of God and neighbor have fallen far short of their potential. A major reason, I argue, is psychologists’ love–hate relationship with love. Psychologists raise challenging questions about love (or some understandings of love), based on their (usually implicit) ethical intuitions (e.g., that telling battered women to love their abusers harms them). In addition, some understandings of love (e.g., pertaining to obligations, choices, and/or divine action) fit poorly with psychology's natural scientific methods. On the other hand, psychologists conduct research relevant to love and most psychologists seem deeply committed to love. Psychologists thus both critique love (hate it) and affirm it. Multidisciplinary approaches for developing a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of love are discussed.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.
3.
American Psychological Association. (2004). Article 1. Bylaws of the American Psychological Association.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 23, 2004, from http://www.apa.org/governance/bylaws/art1.html
4.
BarkerC., PistrangN., & ElliottR. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners (2nd ed.). London: Wiley.
5.
BarkerP. (2000). Reflections on caring as a virtue ethic within an evidence-based culture. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 37, 329–336.
6.
BarlowD. H. (1996). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: Science and policy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 236–240.
7.
BatsonC. D. (2002). Addressing the altruism question experimentally. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 89–105). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
BatsonC. D., KleinT. R., HighbergerL., & ShawL. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1042–1054.
9.
BerkowitzP. (1995). Nietzsche: The ethics of an immoralist.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BeyersM. S., & ReberJ. S. (1998). The illusion of intimacy: A Levinasian critique of evolutionary psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 18, 176–192.
11.
BirchB. C., & RasmussenL. L. (1989). Bible and ethics in the Christian life (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg.
12.
BrazierD. (1993). The necessary condition is love: Going beyond self in the person-centred approach. In BrazierD. (Ed.), Beyond Carl Rogers (pp. 72–91). London: Constable.
13.
BrowningD. S. (1987). Religious thought and the modern psychologies: A critical conversation in the theology of culture.Philadelphia: Fortress.
14.
BrowningD. S. (2002). Science and religion on the nature of love. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 335–345). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
15.
CassellE. J. (2002). Compassion. In SnyderC. R., & LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 434–445). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
CermakT. L. (1986). Diagnosing and treating co-dependence: A guide for professionals who work with chemical dependents, their spouses, and children.Minneapolis, MN: Johnson Institute Books.
17.
CollinsG. R. (2000). An integration view. In JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (Eds.), Psychology and Christianity: Four views (pp. 102–129). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
18.
CrossR. W. (1998). Aquinas on psychology. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 17, 306–320.
19.
DennettD. C. (2003). Freedom evolves.New York: Viking.
20.
DohertyW. J. (1995). Soul searching: Why psychotherapy must promote moral responsibility.New York: Basic.
21.
ElliottR., FischerC. T., & RennieD. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.
22.
EngelhardtH. T.Jr. (2005). Sin and bioethics: Why a liturgical anthropology is foundational. Christian Bioethics: Non-ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, 11, 221–239.
23.
EvansC. S. (1977). Preserving the person: A look at the human sciences.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
24.
EvansC. S. (1989). Wisdom and humanness in psychology: Prospects for a Christian approach.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
25.
EvansC. S. (2004). Kierkegaard's ethic of love: Divine commands and moral obligations.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
26.
FineR. (1990). Love and work: The value system of psychoanalysis.New York: Continuum.
27.
FowersB. J. (2003). Reason and human finitude: In praise of practical wisdom. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 415–426.
28.
FowersB. J. (2005). Virtue and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practices.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
FowersB. J., & TjeltveitA. C. (2003). Virtue obscured and retrieved: Character, community, and practices in behavioral science. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 387–394.
30.
FrankR. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions.New York: Norton.
31.
FricchoneG. L. (2002). Separation, attachment, and altruistic love: The evolutionary basis for medical caring. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 346–361). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
32.
GanttE. E. (2000). Levinas, psychotherapy, and the ethics of suffering. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40, 9–28.
33.
GanttE. E., & WilliamsR. N. (Eds.). (2002). Psychology for the other: Levinas, ethics and the practice of psychology.Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
34.
GrantC. (2001). Altruism and Christian ethics.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35.
GrenzS. (1997). The moral quest: Foundations of Christian ethics.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
36.
HallettG. L. (1989). Christian neighbor-love: An assessment of six rival versions.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
37.
HallettG. L. (1998). Priorities and Christian ethics.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
HarringtonD. R. (1994). Responsible subjectivity: Levinas and humanistic psychology. Humanistic Psychologist, 22, 39–52.
39.
HaysR. B. (1996). The moral vision of the New Testament: Community, cross, new creation.San Francisco: HarperSan-Francisco.
40.
HaysR. B. (1997, February 26). Salvation by trust? Reading the Bible faithfully. Christian Century, 218–223.
41.
HazanC., & ShaverP. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.
42.
HendrickS., & HendrickC. (2002). Love. In SnyderC. R., & LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 472–484). New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
HillC. E., & LambertM. J. (2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. In LambertM. J. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 84–135). New York: Wiley.
44.
JacksonT. P. (2003). The priority of love: Christian charity and social justice.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
JeffriesV. (1993). Virtue and attraction: Validation of a measure of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 99–117.
46.
JeffriesV. (1998). Virtue and the altruistic personality. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 151–166.
47.
JenkinsA. H. (1996). Psychology and African-Americans: A humanistic approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48.
JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (2000a). Finding one truth in four views. In JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (Eds.), Psychology and Christianity: Four views (pp. 243–265). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
49.
JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (Eds.). (2000b). Psychology and Christianity: Four views.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
50.
JonesS. L., & ButmanR. E. (1991). Modern psychotherapies: A comprehensive Christian appraisal.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
51.
KaneR. (1996). The significance of free will.New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
KaneR. (2002). The Oxford handbook of free will.New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
KendlerH. H. (2000). Amoral thoughts about morality: The intersection of science, psychology, and ethics.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
54.
KitwoodT. (1990). Concern for others: A new psychology of conscience and morality.London: Routledge.
55.
KochS. (1969). Value properties: Their significance for psychology, axiology, and science. In GreeneM. (Ed.), The anatomy of knowledge (pp. 119–148). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
56.
KorchinS. J. (1976). Modern clinical psychology.New York: Basic Books.
57.
KunzG. (1998). The paradox of power and weakness: Levinas and an alternative paradigm for psychology.Albany: State University of New York Press.
58.
LeaheyT. L. (2000). A history of psychology: Main currents in psychological thought (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
59.
LewisC. S. (1960). The four loves.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
60.
MartinM. W. (1996). Love's virtues.Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
61.
MayW. F. (1984). The virtues in a professional setting. Soundings, 67, 245–266.
62.
MearaN. M., SchmidtL. D., & DayJ. D. (1996). Principles and virtues: A foundation for ethical decisions, policies, and character. Counseling Psychologist, 24, 4–77.
63.
MyersD. G. (2000a). A levels-of-explanation response. In JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (Eds.), Psychology and Christianity: Four views (pp. 226–231). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
64.
MyersD. G. (2000b). A levels-of-explanation view. In JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (Eds.), Psychology and Christianity: Four views (pp. 54–83). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
65.
NicholsonI. A. M. (2003). Inventing personality: Gordon All-port and the science of selfhood.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
66.
NietzscheF. (1968). Twilight of the idols and the anti-Christ (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Hammondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1889)
67.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education.Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
NoddingsN. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education.New York: Teachers College Press.
69.
NorcrossJ. C. (Ed.). (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients.New York: Oxford.
70.
OllendickT. H. (1999, Fall). Clinical science and clinical practice: Where to from here?Clinical Psychologist, 52(4), 1–3.
71.
OrlinskyD. E., RønnestadM. H., & WilutzkiU. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process–outcome research: Continuity and change. In LambertM. J. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 307–389). New York: Wiley.
72.
PellegrinoE. D. (1989). Character, virtue, and self-interest in the ethics of the professions. Journal of Contemporary Health Policy and Law, 5, 53–73.
73.
PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; New York: Oxford University Press.
74.
PostS. G. (2002a). Conclusion to Part V. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 376–378). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
75.
PostS. G. (2002b). The tradition of agape. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 51–64). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
76.
PostS. G. (2003). Unlimited love: Altruism, compassion, and service.Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
77.
PostS. G., JohnsonB., McCulloughM. E., & SchlossJ. P. (2003). Research on altruism and love: An annotated bibliography of major studies in psychology, sociology, evolutionary biology, and theology.Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
78.
PostS. G., & UnderwoodL. G. (2002). Concluding summary: Future research needs on altruism and altruistic love. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 379–386). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
79.
PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (2002). General introduction. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (3–12). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
80.
PowlisonD. (2000). A biblical counseling view. In JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (Eds.), Psychology and Christianity: Four views (196–225). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
RichardsonF. C. (2003). Virtue ethics, dialogue, and “reverence.”American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 442–458.
86.
RicoeurP. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation (D. Savage, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
87.
RobertsR. C. (2000). A Christian psychology view. In JohnsonE. L., & JonesS. L. (Eds.), Psychology and Christianity: Four views (pp. 148–177). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
88.
RychlakJ. F. (1988). The psychology of rigorous humanism (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
89.
RychlakJ. F. (1994). Logical learning theory: A human teleology and its empirical support.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
90.
RychlakJ. F. (2003). The human image in postmodern America.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
91.
SampsonE. E. (2003). Unconditional kindness to strangers: Human sociality and the foundation for an ethical psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13, 147–176.
SlifeB. D. (2005). Are the assumptions of social science process compatible with theological content? In DueckA., & LeeC. (Eds.), Why psychology needs theology: A radical-reformation perspective (pp. 163–184). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
94.
SmedesL. B. (1983). Mere morality: What God expects from ordinary people.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
95.
SoberE. (2002). The ABCs of altruism. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 17–28). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
96.
SpriggeT. L. S. (2000). Is pity the basis of ethics? Nietzsche versus Schopenhauer. In SweetW. (Ed.), The bases of ethics (pp. 103–125). Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
97.
StilesW. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593–618.
98.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99.
TjeltveitA. C. (1991). Christian ethics and psychological explanations of “religious values” in therapy: Critical connections. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 10, 101–112.
100.
TjeltveitA. C. (1999). Ethics and values in psychotherapy.London: Routledge.
101.
TjeltveitA. C. (2003). Implicit virtue theory, divergent goods, and multiple communities: Psychology explicitly addressing virtues. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 395–414.
102.
TjeltveitA. C. (in press). To what ends? Psychotherapy goals and outcomes, the good life, and the principle of beneficence. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training.
103.
TjeltveitA. C., & FowersB. F. (Eds.). (2003). Explorations of human excellence in behavioral science: Rediscovering virtue in scholarship, teaching, and practice [Special issue]. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(4).
104.
ToulminS. E. (1975). The twin moralities of science. In SteneckN. H. (Ed.), Science and society: Past, present, and future (pp. 111–124). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
105.
UnderwoodL. G. (2002a). Conclusion to Part II. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 140–142). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
106.
UnderwoodL. G. (2002b). The human experience of compassionate love: Conceptual mapping and data from selected studies. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 72–88). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
107.
VacekE. C. (1994). Love, human and divine: The heart of Christian ethics.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
108.
VandenbergB. (1999). Levinas and the ethical context of human development. Human Development, 42, 31–44.
109.
VitzP. C. (1990). The use of stories in moral development: New psychological reasons for an old education method. American Psychologist, 45, 709–720.
110.
WallaceE. R.IV (1986). Freud as ethicist. In StepanskyP. (Ed.), Freud, appraisals and reappraisals: Contributions to Freud studies (pp. 83–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
111.
WallaceE. R.IV (1991). Psychiatry: The healing amphibian. In BrowningD. S., & EvisonI. S. (Eds.), Does psychiatry need a public philosophy? (pp. 74–120). Chicago: Nelson–Hall.
112.
WatermanA. S. (1988). On the uses of psychological theory and research in the process of ethical inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 283–298.
113.
WestphalM. (1993). Suspicion and faith: The religious uses of modern atheism.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
114.
WilliamsR. N., & GanttE. E. (1998). Intimacy and heteronomy: On grounding psychology in the ethical. Theory and Psychology, 8, 253–267.
115.
WyschogrodE. (2002). Pythagorean bodies and the body of altruism. In PostS. G., UnderwoodL. G., SchlossJ. P., & HurlbutW. B. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 29–39). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
