Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1994-12
Exemplary Approach to Operationalizing Psychoanalytic Theory and Religion: Commentary on “The Relationship of God Image to Level of Object Relations Development”
BlattS. J., BrenneisC. B., SchimekJ. G., & GlickM. (1976). Normal development and the psychopathological impairment of the concept of the object on the Rorschach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 264–373.
2.
BrokawB. F., & EdwardsK. J. (1994). The relationship of God image to level of object relations development. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 352–371.
3.
CoonertyS. (1986). An exploration of separation-individuation themes in the borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 501–511.
4.
FowlerJ. W. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning.New York: Harper and Row.
5.
GorsuchR. (1968). The conceptualization of God as seen in adjective ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.7, 56–64.
6.
IppH. (1986). Object relations of feminine boys: A Rorschach assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University.
7.
KwawerJ. (1980). Primitive interpersonal modes, borderline phenomena, and Rorschach content. In KwawerJ., LernerH., LernerP., & SugarmanA. (Eds.), Borderline phenomena and the Rorschach test (pp. 89–106). New York: International Universities Press.
8.
LernerP. M. (1991). Psychoanalytic theory and the Rorschach.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
9.
LovingerR. J. (1984). Working with religious issues in therapy.New York: Aronson.
10.
McDarghJ. (1983). Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion.New York: University Press of America.
11.
SaurM. S., & SaurW. G. (1992). Images of God: A study of psychoanalyzed adults. In FinnM., & GartnerJ. (Eds.), Object relations theory and religion (pp. 129–140). Westport, CT: Praeger.
12.
SchlossbergN. (1985). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. The Counseling Psychologist, 9, 2–17.
