Objective: A growing body of research has examined the relationship between participation in college promise programs (CPP) and student outcomes, including college enrollment, persistence, and completion. However, variation in CPP design limits the extent to which study findings are generalizable. Further, most studies analyze the outcomes of student participation in the whole program rather than specific program features. This study explored the relationship between CPP participation and degree completion among part-time students. Method: Analyses relied on administrative data from a single community college located in the western United States. Estimates were derived from a matched sample and a series of linear probability models. Results: Results showed that CPP participants were significantly more likely than the comparison group to enroll full-time for at least one semester after initially enrolling on a part-time basis. Results also indicated that all participants were significantly more likely to earn transfer-oriented associate’s degrees and certificates than their peers in the comparison group. Importantly, while full-time attendance was associated with increased probabilities of completion for all program participants, the relationship was moderated by CPP participation.
AlexanderK.BozickR.EntwisleD. (2008). Warming up, cooling out, or holding steady? Persistence and change in educational expectations after high school. Sociology of Education, 81(4), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100403
2.
BahrP. R. (2008). Cooling out in the community college: What is the effect of academic advising on students’ chances of success?Research in Higher Education, 49(8), 704–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9100-0
3.
BartikT. J.HershbeinB.LachowskaM. (2019). The effects of the kalamazoo promise scholarship on college enrollment and completion. Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 0416-7824R4. https://doi.org/10.3368/JHR.56.1.0416-7824R4
4.
BeckerG. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press.
5.
BerginD. A.CooksH. C.BerginC. C. (2007). Effects of a college access program for youth underrepresented in higher education: A randomized experiment. Research in Higher Education, 48(6), 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11162-006-9049-9/METRICS
6.
BifulcoR.RubensteinR.SohnH. (2019). Evaluating the effects of universal place-based scholarships on student outcomes: The Buffalo “Say Yes to Education” program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 918–943. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAM.22139
7.
BlackwellM.IacusS.KingG.PorroG. (2009). CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(4), 3.
8.
BozickR.GonzalezG.EngbergJ. (2015). Using a merit-based scholarship program to increase rates of college enrollment in an Urban school district: The Case of the Pittsburgh promise. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 45(2), 1552. https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1552
9.
CarruthersC. K.FoxW. F. (2015). Aid for all: College coaching, financial aid, and post-secondary persistence in Tennessee ✩. Economics of Education Review, 51, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.06.001
10.
CarruthersC. K.FoxW. F. (2016). Aid for all: College coaching, financial aid, and post-secondary postsecondary persistence in Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 51, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.06.001
11.
CastilloW.CollinsG. J.MaynardR. A. (2020). A systematic review of evidence on the effectiveness of targeted college access programs offering no-cost or subsidized college enrollment. In PernaL. W.SmithE. J. (Eds.), Improving research-based knowledge of college promise programs (pp. 69–92). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxw3phv.7
12.
ChenX. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161). National Center for Education Statistics.
DaughertyL.GonzalezG. C. (2016). The impact of the new haven promise program on college enrollment, choice, and persistence. In The impact of the new haven promise program on college enrollment, choice, and persistence. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/WR1147
15.
Deil-AmenR. (2006). “Warming up” the aspirations of community college students. In RosenbaumJ. E.Deil-AmenR.PersonA. (Eds.), After admission: College access to college success (pp. 40–65). Russell Sage Foundation. www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610444781.7
16.
DemingD.DynarskiS. (2009). Into college, out of poverty? Policies to increase the postsecondary attainment of the poor (No. 15387; Working Paper). National Bureau of Economic Research.
17.
DynarskiS. (2002). The behavioral and distributional implications of aid forcollege. American Economic Review, 92(2), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320189401
18.
DynarskiS. (2005). Building the stock of college-educated labor. In NBER Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w11604.pdf
GershenfeldS.ZhanM.HoodD. (2019). The impact of a promise: A loan replacement grant, low-income students, and college graduation. Review of Higher Education, 42, 1073–1100. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0030
21.
GonzalezG. C.BozickR.Tharp-TaylorS.PhillipsA. (2011). Fulfilling the Pittsburgh Promise early progress of Pittsburgh’s postsecondary scholarship program. www.rand.org
22.
GurantzO. (2020). What does free community college buy? Early impacts from the oregon promise. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAM.22157
23.
HarrisD. N.Farmer-HintonR.KimD.DiamondJ.ReavisT. B.RifeljK. K.LustickH.CarlB. (2018). The promise of free college (and its potential pitfalls) Evidence on the design, implementation, and effects of a performance-based college aid program from a randomized control trial. Brown Center on Education Policy, Brookings Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED592611
24.
HarrisD. N.MillsJ. (2021). Optimal college financial aid: Theory and evidence on free college, early commitment, and merit aid from an eight-year randomized trial (No. 21–393; EDWorkingPaper). Annenberg Institute, Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/wz1m-v526
LevinH. M.McEwanP. J. (2003). Cost-effectiveness analysis as an evaluation tool. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, 2, 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_10
Miller-AdamsM. (2021). The path to free college: In pursuit of access, equity, and prosperity. Harvard Education Press.
29.
PageL. C.IritiJ. E.LowryD. J.AnthonyA. M. (2019). The promise of place-based investment in postsecondary access and success: Investigating the impact of the pittsburgh promise. Education Finance and Policy, 14(4), 572–600. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00257
30.
ParkT. J. (2015). The impact of full-time enrollment in the first semester on community college transfer rates: New evidence from Texas with pre-college determinants. Teachers College Record, 117(112), 1–34.
RipolloneJ. E.HuybrechtsK. F.RothmanK. J.FergusonR. E.FranklinJ. M. (2020). Evaluating the utility of coarsened exact matching for pharmacoepidemiology using real and simulated claims data. American Journal of Epidemiology, 189(6), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz268
34.
RubinD. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the Tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020363010465
35.
SwansonE.RitterG. (2018). Start to finish: Examining the impact of the El Dorado promise on postsecondary outcomes. SSRN Electronic Journal, 49, 2. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3153153
36.
SwansonE.WatsonA.RitterG.NicholsM. (2017). Promises fulfilled? A systematic review of the impacts of promise programs. Working Paper No. 2016-16, EDRE, University of Arkansas. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2849194 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2849194
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study of 2011 (BPS: 2011–17). National Center for Education Statistics.
