The Good,The Bad,and the Balanced: A Typology of State Merit-Aid Programs for Community College Students

Abstract

Objective/Research Question: States have increasingly used merit-based criteria to distribute scholarships and grants, and the dominant conversation on merit-aid programs centers on students attending 4-year colleges and universities. This study examines the characteristics of state-funded merit-aid programs for community college students and provides implications for policymaking to promote educational equity. Methods: With a newly collected dataset capturing a variety of program-level features of state-funded merit-aid policies between 2003 and 2021, we used latent class analysis to identify different types of merit-aid programs for community college students. We present a 3-class model based on model fit indices and practical interpretation of policy designs. Results: Findings indicate three classes of merit-aid programs that extended support to community college students: The Community College Marginalizing Programs (n = 47), The Community College Targeted Programs (n = 4), and The Balanced Programs (n = 17). Conclusions/Contributions: Drawing on Mettler’s notion of the policyscape, we discuss the characteristics of the three types of merit-aid programs and provide implications for designing merit-aid programs to better support community college students and promote educational equity.

Keywords

merit-based aid state policy latent class analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaike

(1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359

American Association of Community Colleges. (2022). Fast facts 2022. https://www.aacc.nche.edu/2022/02/28/42888/

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2012). Using Mplus TECH11 and TECH14 to test the number of latent classes (Mplus Web Notes No. 14). https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote14.pdf

Baime

D. S.

Mullin

C. M.

(2011). Promoting educational opportunity: The Pell Grant program at community colleges. AACC Policy Brief.

Baker

D. J.

Edwards

Lambert

S. F.

Randall

(2021). The politics of community college districts: A national overview and implications for racial gerrymandering in Texas (CEPA Working Paper No. 21-08). Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED616275.pdf

Barlament

(April 10, 2021). HOPE scholarship. New Georgia Encyclopedia. https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/education/hope-scholarship/

Billings

M. S.

Gándara

A. Y.

(2021). Tuition free promise programs: Implications and lessons learned. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2021(196), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20485

Birch

Rosenman

(2019). How much does merit aid actually matter? Revisiting merit aid and college enrollment when some students “come anyway.” Research in Higher Education, 60(6), 760–802.

Brown

(2007). Merit aid: The practice of giving money to those who do not need it. New Directions for Student Services, 2007(118), 39–47.

10.

Bruce

D. J.

Carruthers

C. K.

(2014). Jackpot? The impact of lottery scholarships on enrollment in Tennessee. Journal of Urban Economics, 81, 30–44.

11.

Buchmann

Condron

D. J.

Roscigno

V. J.

(2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–461.

12.

Carbonaro

Ellison

B. J.

Covay

(2011). Gender inequalities in the college pipeline. Social Science Research, 40(1), 120–135.

13.

Chen

(2021). The nudge to finish up: A national study of community college near-completion students. Research in Higher Education, 62, 651–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09613-9

14.

Cohen

A. M.

Brawer

F. B.

(2003). The American community college (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

15.

Cohen-Vogel

Ingle

W. K.

Levine

A. A.

Spence

(2008). The “spread” of merit-based college aid: Politics, policy consortia, and interstate competition. Educational Policy, 22(3), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307059

16.

Cohodes

S. R.

Goodman

J. S.

(2014). Merit aid, college quality, and college completion: Massachusetts’ Adams scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(4), 251–285. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.4.251

17.

Complete College America. (2022). Part-time students must be a full-time priority. https://completecollege.org/resource/parttimestudentsmustbeafulltimepriority/

18.

Cummings

K. M.

Deane

K. C.

McCall

B. P.

DesJardins

S. L.

(2022). Exploring race and income heterogeneity in the effects of state merit aid loss among four-year college entrants. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(6), 873–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2022.2042155

19.

Curs

(2008). The effects of institutional merit-based aid on the enrollment decisions of needy students. Enrollment Management Journal, 2(1), 10–31.

20.

Custer

B. D.

Akaeze

H. O.

(2021). A typology of state financial aid grant programs using latent class analysis. Research in Higher Education, 62(2), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09585-5

21.

Davidson

C. T.

Ashby-King

D. T.

Sciulli

L. J.

(2020). The higher education funding revolution: Exploring statewide community college “free tuition” program. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2018.1558135

22.

Delaney

J. A.

Doyle

W. R.

(2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36(4), 343–368. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23018116

23.

Denson

Ing

Arch

D. A. N.

Garber

A. C.

Chan

M.-k.

Carter

D. B.

Nylund-Gibson

(2022). A latent class analysis of students’ openness to learning from diverse others. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000451

24.

Domina

(2014). Does merit aid program design matter? A cross-cohort analysis. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9302-y

25.

Doyle

W. R.

(2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(3), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737028003259

26.

Dynarski

(2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53(3), 629–661. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.3S.02

27.

Engberg

M. E.

Gilbert

A. J.

(2014). The counseling opportunity structure: Examining correlates of four-year college-going rates. Research in Higher Education, 55, 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9309-4

28.

Engle

Tinto

(2008). Moving beyond access: College success for low-income, first-generation students. Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.

29.

Fernandez

(2021). Community colleges in the policyscape: Concluding thoughts for research and practice. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2021(196), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20488

30.

Fitzpatrick

M. D.

Jones

(2016). Post-baccalaureate migration and merit-based scholarships. Economics of Education Review, 54, 155–172.

31.

Gándara

(2020). How the sausage is made: An examination of a state funding model design process. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 192–221. http://doi/org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1618782

32.

Gándara

(2020). Promise for whom? “Free-college” programs and enrollments by race and gender classifications at public, 2-year colleges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720962472

33.

Georgia Student Finance Commission. (2022). HOPE and Zell Miller Scholarships. https://www.gafutures.org/hope-state-aid-programs/hope-zell-miller-scholarships/hope-scholarship/initial-academic-eligibility/

34.

Goldrick-Rab

(2010). Challenges and opportunities for improving community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 437–469. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310370163

35.

Griffith

A. L.

(2011). Keeping up with the Joneses: Institutional changes following the adoption of a merit aid policy. Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 1022–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.003

36.

Guinier

(2015). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Beacon Press.

37.

Gurantz

Odle

T. K.

(2022). The impact of merit aid on college choice and degree attainment: Reexamining Florida’s Bright Futures Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 44(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737211030489

38.

Hansen

(2021). Average cost of community college. Education Data Initiative. https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-community-college

39.

Harrington

Muñoz

Curs

Ehlert

(2016). Examining the impact of a highly targeted state administered merit aid program on brain drain: Evidence from a regression discontinuity analysis of Missouri’s Bright Flight Program. Research in Higher Education, 57(4), 423–447.

40.

Haveman

Smeeding

(2006). The role of higher education in social mobility. The Future of Children, 16(2), 125–150.

41.

Heller

Rasmussen

(2001). Merit scholarships and college access: Evidence from two states. State merit aid programs: College access and equity. The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.

42.

Henry

G. T.

Rubenstein

Bugler

D. T.

(2004). Is HOPE enough? Impacts of receiving and losing merit-based financial aid. Educational Policy, 18(5), 686–709.

43.

Jackson

D. L.

(2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6

44.

Kentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority. (2022). Kentucky Educational Excellence Scholarship (KEES). https://web.archive.org/web/20230604182858/https://www.kheaa.com/web/scholarships-grants.faces#kees

45.

Kline

R. B.

(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.

46.

Kramer

J. W.

(2019). Bridging high school and college: Supporting enrollment for college-intending high school seniors in Tennessee. Vanderbilt University.

47.

Kramer

J. W.

(2022). Expectations of a promise: The psychological contracts between students, the state, and key actors in a tuition-free college environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 44(4), 759–782. http://doi.org/10.3102/01623737221090265.

48.

Lee

(2016). Does merit aid improve college affordability? Testing the Bennett Hypothesis in the era of merit-based aid. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 46(2), 51–79. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jsfa/vol46/iss2/4

49.

Lee

Fernandez

H. K.

(2022). Promise scholarship consequences: Early evidence from Tennessee and Oregon. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2022(197), 29–43.

50.

Leeds

DesJardins

(2015). The effect of merit aid on enrollment: A regression discontinuity analysis of Iowa’s National Scholars Award. Research in Higher Education, 56(5), 471–495.

51.

Liu

(2011). Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education. Higher Education, 62(4), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9394-7

52.

Lowry

R. C.

(2019). The effects of state higher education policies and institutions on access by economically disadvantaged students. Research in Higher Education, 60(1), 44–63.

53.

Maryland Higher Education Commission. (2022). Howard P. Rawlings guaranteed access grant. https://mhec.maryland.gov/preparing/Pages/FinancialAid/ProgramDescriptions/prog_gagrant.aspx

54.

McLendon

M. K.

Tandberg

D. A.

Hillman

N. W.

(2014). Financing college opportunity: Factors influencing state spending on student financial aid and campus appropriations, 1990 through 2010. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 143–162.

55.

Mettler

(2014). Degrees of inequality: How the politics of higher education sabotaged the American dream. BasicBooks.

56.

Miller-Adams

(2015). Promise nation: Transforming communities through place-based scholarships. Kalamazoo, MI. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/9780880995061

57.

Muñoz

Harrington

J. R.

Curs

B. R.

Ehlert

(2016). Democratization and diversion: The effect of Missouri’s A+ Schools Program on postsecondary enrollment. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(6), 801–830.

58.

The National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs. (2019). 50th Annual survey reports on state-sponsored student financial aid, 2018-2019 academic year. https://www.nassgapsurvey.com/survey_reports/2018-2019-50th.pdf

59.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Total fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by level of enrollment, sex of student, level and control of institution, and attendance status of student: 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_303.60.asp?current=yes

60.

Ness

E. C.

(2010). The politics of determining merit aid eligibility criteria: An analysis of the policy process. Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0080

61.

Ness

E. C.

Mistretta

M. A.

(2010). Merit aid in North Carolina: A case study of a “nonevent.” Educational Policy, 24(5), 703–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904809339165

62.

Ness

E. C.

Tucker

(2008). Eligibility effects on college access: Under-represented student perceptions of Tennessee’s Merit Aid Program. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 569–588.

63.

New Jersey Higher Education Assistance Authority. (2022). New Jersey Student Tuition Assistance Award Scholarship (STARS). https://www.hesaa.org/Documents/NJSTARS_program.pdf

64.

Nylund-Gibson

Choi

A. Y.

(2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176

65.

Orsuwan

Heck

R.H.

(2009). Merit-based student aid and freshman interstate college migration: Testing a dynamic model of policy change. Research in Higher Education, 50(1), 24–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9108-5

66.

Perna

L. W.

(2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In Smart

J. C.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). Springer.

67.

Perna

L. W.

Leigh

E. W.

(2018). Understanding the promise: A typology of state and local college promise programs. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17742653

68.

Perna

L.W.

Leigh

E. W.

(2020). Database of college promise programs. University of Pennsylvania Alliance for Higher Education and Democracy. https://www.ahead-penn.org/creating-knowledge/college-promise

69.

Perna

L. W.

Leigh

E. W.

Carroll

(2017). “Free college:” A new and improved state approach to increasing educational attainment? American Behavioral Scientist, 61(14), 1740–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217744821

70.

Posselt

J. R.

Jaquette

Bielby

Bastedo

M. N.

(2012). Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972–2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1074–1111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212439456

71.

Robison

R. A.

(1995). Missouri’s A+ schools program: Providing quality education for all students. NASSP Bulletin, 79(574), 26–33.

72.

Romano

R. M.

Eddy

P. L.

(2017). Community colleges and social mobility. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(6), 55–62.

73.

Schwarz

(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

74.

Sclove

S. L.

(1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360

75.

Sjoquist

D. L.

Winters

J. V.

(2014). Merit aid and post-college retention in the state. Journal of Urban Economics, 80, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2013.10.003

76.

Taylor

J. L.

Allen

T. O.

B. P.

Denecker

Edmunds

J. A.

Fink

Giani

M. S.

Hodara

Tobolowsky

B. F.

Chen

(2022). Research priorities for advancing equitable dual enrollment policy and practice. University of Utah.

77.

Toutkoushian

R. K.

Shafiq

M. N.

(2010). A conceptual analysis of state support for higher education: Appropriations versus need-based financial aid. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 40–64.

78.

University of Alabama. (2022). In-State Freshman Scholarships. https://afford.ua.edu/scholarships/in-state-freshman/

79.

Virginia Department of Education. (2022). Granville P. Meade Scholarship. https://web.archive.org/web/20220523043900/https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/virginia_scholarships/granville_meade/index.shtml

80.

Welch

J. G.

(2014). HOPE for community college students: The impact of merit aid on persistence, graduation, and earnings. Economics of Education Review, 43, 1–20.

81.

Weller

B. E.

Bowen

N. K.

Faubert

S. J.

(2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932

82.

Whatley

(2019). Study abroad participation: An unintended consequence of state merit-aid programs. Research in Higher Education, 60(7), 905–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-09540-w

83.

Wurpts

I. C.

Geiser

(2014). Is adding more indicators to a latent class analysis beneficial or detrimental? Results of a Monte-Carlo study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–15. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00920

84.

Zhang

Sun

(2016). The effect of Florida’s Bright Futures Program on college choice: A regression discontinuity approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 115–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777396