*Motivational Pathways Underlying Gifted Underachievement: Trajectory Classes,Longitudinal Outcomes,and Predicting Factors

Abstract

This study used a longitudinal person-oriented approach to examine whether two distinct developmental pathways of maladaptive motivation could be distinguished among high-ability students (intelligence quotient [IQ] ≥ 120, N = 403, M_age = 12.2 years, 60.5% males), as proposed by the Pathways to Underachievement Model. Latent class growth analysis provided evidence for a three-class solution, including an adaptive class and two maladaptive classes, largely corresponding with the predictions of the Pathways to Underachievement Model. Furthermore, the classes related to the outcome variables in the expected ways, with the maladaptive classes showing higher disengagement and underachievement. These findings substantiate the Pathways to Underachievement Model and provide developmental insight into the multiple motivational pathways underlying disengagement and underachievement among high-ability students.

Keywords

latent profile analysis / latent class analysis longitudinal motivation underachievement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archambault

Eccles

J. S.

Vida

M. N.

(2010). Ability self-concepts and subjective value in literacy: Joint trajectories from grades 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 804–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021075

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2021, February 4). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model (Mplus Web Notes, No. 21). https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote21.pdf

Bakk

Vermunt

J. K.

(2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.955104

Bolck

Croon

Hagenaars

(2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001

Boncquet

Soenens

Verschueren

Lavrijsen

Flamant

Vansteenkiste

(2020). Killing two birds with one stone: The role of motivational resources in predicting changes in achievement and school well-being beyond intelligence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101905

Byrne

B. M.

(2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

Covington

M. V.

(1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge University Press.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Chen

J. A.

Tutwiler

M. S.

(2017). Implicit theories of ability and self-efficacy: Testing alternative social cognitive models to science motivation. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 225(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000289

10.

Costa

Faria

(2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829

11.

Crocker

Wolfe

C. T.

(2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108(3), 593–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593

12.

Dai

D. Y.

Moon

S. M.

Feldhusen

J. F.

(1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653290

13.

Dixon

R. M.

Craven

Martin

A. J.

(2006). Underachievement in a whole city cohort of academically gifted children: What does it look like? Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 15(2), 9–15. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/221

14.

Dweck

C. S.

Chiu

Hong

(1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1

15.

Figg

S. D.

Rogers

K. B.

McCormick

Low

(2012). Differentiating low performance of the gifted learner: Achieving, underachieving, and selective consuming students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11430000

16.

Fong

C. J.

Kremer

K. P.

(2020). An expectancy-value approach to math underachievement: Examining high school achievement, college attendance, and STEM interest. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219890599

17.

Frost

Marten

Lahart

Rosenblate

(1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967

18.

Geiser

(2013). Data analysis with Mplus. Guilford Press.

19.

Gagné

(2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682

20.

Gaspard

Lauermann

Rose

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2020). Cross-domain trajectories of students’ ability self-concepts and intrinsic values in math and language arts. Child Development, 91(5), 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13343

21.

Germeijs

De Boeck

(2002). A measurement scale for indecisiveness and its relationship to career indecision and other types of indecision. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.12.002

22.

Hirt

E. R.

Deppe

R. K.

Gordon

L. J.

(1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.981

23.

Institute for Research and Reform in Education. (1998). Research Assessment Package for Schools (RAPS) Manual. Institute for Research and Reform in Education.

24.

Jackson

Jung

(2022). The Identification of gifted underachievement: Validity evidence for the commonly used methods. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 1133–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12492

25.

Jung

Wickrama

K. A. S.

(2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x

26.

Kaur

(2014). A study of adolescent’s strengths and difficulties and academic self-regulation. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 5(8), 913–917.

27.

Kröner

Goussios

Schaitz

Streb

Sosic-Vasic

(2017). The construct validity of the German Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) within primary and secondary school children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1032. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01032

28.

Ladd

G. W.

Dinella

L. M.

(2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013153

29.

Landis

R. N.

Reschly

A. L.

(2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213480864

30.

Lau

K. L.

Chan

D. W.

(2001). Identification of underachievers in Hong Kong: Do different methods select different underachievers? Educational Studies, 27(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690120050419

31.

Lavrijsen

Ramos

Verschueren

(2020). Detecting unfulfilled potential: Perceptions of underachievement by student, parents, and teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90, 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1852523

32.

Lavrijsen

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Verschueren

(2020). Is intelligence related to perfectionism? Multidimensional perfectionism and parental antecedents among adolescents across varying levels of cognitive ability. Journal of Personality, 89(4), 652–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12606

33.

Legault

Green-Demers

Pelletier

(2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567

34.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

Patall

E. A.

(2016). Motivation. In Corno

Anderman

E. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 91–103). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

35.

Liu

W. C.

Wang

C. K. J.

Parkins

E. J.

(2005). A longitudinal study of students’ academic self-concept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X42239

36.

Lüftenegger

Kollmayer

Bergsmann

Jöstl

Spiel

Schober

(2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095075

37.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (Version 8). Author.

38.

Magez

Tierens

Van Huynegem

Van Parijs

Decaluwé

Bos

(2015). CoVaT-CHC Basisversie: Cognitieve vaardigheidstest volgens het CHC-model [CoVaT-CHC: Cognitive ability test based on the CHC-model.]. P. C. T. More).

39.

Makel

Snyder

Thomas

Malone

Putallaz

(2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 203–212.

40.

Marsh

Shavelson

(1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20(3), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1

41.

Midgley

Arunkumar

Maehr

(1996). “If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a reason”: Predictors of adolescents’ use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 423–434.

42.

Musu-Gillette

L. E.

Wigfield

Harring

J. R.

Eccles

J. S.

(2015). Trajectories of change in students’ self-concepts of ability and values in math and college major choice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(4), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1057161

43.

Nagin

D. S.

(1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.139

44.

Nylund

K. L.

Asparouhov

Muthén

B. O.

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396

45.

Obergriesser

Stoeger

(2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003

46.

Pomerantz

E. M.

Kempner

S. G.

(2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2040–2046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031840

47.

Preckel

Holling

Vock

(2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20154

48.

Ritchotte

J. A.

Matthews

M. S.

Flowers

C. P.

(2014). The validity of the achievement-orientation model for gifted middle school students: An exploratory study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534890

49.

Rubenstein

L. D.

Siegle

Reis

S. M.

Mccoach

D. B.

Burton

M. G.

(2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620

50.

Ryan

R. M.

Connell

J. P.

(1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

51.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

Vansteenkiste

Soenens

(2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194

52.

Ramos

Lavrijsen

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Sypre

Verschueren

(2021). Profiles of maladaptive school motivation among high-ability adolescents: A person-centered exploration of the motivational Pathways to Underachievement model. Journal of Adolescence, 88, 146–161.

53.

Snyder

Fong

Painter

Pittard

Barr

Patall

. (2019). Interventions for academically underachieving students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 1–22.

54.

Satorra

Bentler

(2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514.

55.

Siegle

McCoach

D. B.

Roberts

(2017). Why I believe I achieve determines whether I achieve. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1302873

56.

Skinner

Furrer

Marchand

Kindermann

(2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840

57.

Snyder

K. E.

Adelson

J. L.

(2017). The development and validation of the Perceived Academic Underachievement Scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268087

58.

Snyder

K. E.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.835597

59.

Vansteenkiste

Mouratidis

(2016). Emerging trends and future directions for the field of motivation psychology. Psychologica Belgica, 56(3), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.354

60.

Vanwynsberghe

Vanlaar

Van Damme

De Fraine

(2016). Long-term effects of primary schools on educational positions of students 2 and 4 years after the start of secondary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(2), 167–190. http://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1245667

61.

Verhoeven

Verbeeck

(1999). The educational system in Belgium—Flemish community. EURYDICE, Ministry of the Flemish Community, Education Department, Education Policy Coordination Division.

62.

Vermote

Aelterman

Beyers

Aper

Buysschaert

Vansteenkiste

(2020). The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: A circumplex approach. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09827-5

63.

Von Eye

Bogat

. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 390–420.

64.

White

Graham

Blaas

(2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.001

65.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

66.

Wouters

Verschueren

Briers

Janssen

(2016). Development and validation of a Self-esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.001

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB