This study used a longitudinal person-oriented approach to examine whether two distinct developmental pathways of maladaptive motivation could be distinguished among high-ability students (intelligence quotient [IQ] ≥ 120, N = 403, Mage = 12.2 years, 60.5% males), as proposed by the Pathways to Underachievement Model. Latent class growth analysis provided evidence for a three-class solution, including an adaptive class and two maladaptive classes, largely corresponding with the predictions of the Pathways to Underachievement Model. Furthermore, the classes related to the outcome variables in the expected ways, with the maladaptive classes showing higher disengagement and underachievement. These findings substantiate the Pathways to Underachievement Model and provide developmental insight into the multiple motivational pathways underlying disengagement and underachievement among high-ability students.
ArchambaultI.EcclesJ. S.VidaM. N. (2010). Ability self-concepts and subjective value in literacy: Joint trajectories from grades 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 804–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021075
2.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2021, February4). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model (Mplus Web Notes, No. 21). https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote21.pdf
3.
BakkZ.VermuntJ. K. (2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.955104
4.
BolckA.CroonM.HagenaarsJ. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001
5.
BoncquetM.SoenensB.VerschuerenK.LavrijsenJ.FlamantN.VansteenkisteM. (2020). Killing two birds with one stone: The role of motivational resources in predicting changes in achievement and school well-being beyond intelligence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101905
6.
ByrneB. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
7.
CovingtonM. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge University Press.
8.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
9.
ChenJ. A.TutwilerM. S. (2017). Implicit theories of ability and self-efficacy: Testing alternative social cognitive models to science motivation. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 225(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000289
10.
CostaA.FariaL. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829
DaiD. Y.MoonS. M.FeldhusenJ. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653290
13.
DixonR. M.CravenR.MartinA. J. (2006). Underachievement in a whole city cohort of academically gifted children: What does it look like?Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 15(2), 9–15. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/221
14.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.HongY. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
15.
FiggS. D.RogersK. B.McCormickJ.LowR. (2012). Differentiating low performance of the gifted learner: Achieving, underachieving, and selective consuming students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11430000
16.
FongC. J.KremerK. P. (2020). An expectancy-value approach to math underachievement: Examining high school achievement, college attendance, and STEM interest. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219890599
17.
FrostR.MartenP.LahartC.RosenblateR. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967
18.
GeiserC. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. Guilford Press.
GaspardH.LauermannF.RoseN.WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2020). Cross-domain trajectories of students’ ability self-concepts and intrinsic values in math and language arts. Child Development, 91(5), 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13343
21.
GermeijsV.De BoeckP. (2002). A measurement scale for indecisiveness and its relationship to career indecision and other types of indecision. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.12.002
22.
HirtE. R.DeppeR. K.GordonL. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.981
23.
Institute for Research and Reform in Education. (1998). Research Assessment Package for Schools (RAPS) Manual. Institute for Research and Reform in Education.
24.
JacksonR.JungJ. (2022). The Identification of gifted underachievement: Validity evidence for the commonly used methods. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 1133–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12492
25.
JungT.WickramaK. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
26.
KaurH.KaurK. (2014). A study of adolescent’s strengths and difficulties and academic self-regulation. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 5(8), 913–917.
27.
KrönerJ.GoussiosC.SchaitzC.StrebJ.Sosic-VasicZ. (2017). The construct validity of the German Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) within primary and secondary school children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1032. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01032
28.
LaddG. W.DinellaL. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade?Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013153
29.
LandisR. N.ReschlyA. L. (2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213480864
30.
LauK. L.ChanD. W. (2001). Identification of underachievers in Hong Kong: Do different methods select different underachievers?Educational Studies, 27(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690120050419
31.
LavrijsenJ.RamosA.VerschuerenK. (2020). Detecting unfulfilled potential: Perceptions of underachievement by student, parents, and teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90, 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1852523
32.
LavrijsenJ.SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.VerschuerenK. (2020). Is intelligence related to perfectionism? Multidimensional perfectionism and parental antecedents among adolescents across varying levels of cognitive ability. Journal of Personality, 89(4), 652–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12606
33.
LegaultL.Green-DemersI.PelletierL. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567
34.
Linnenbrink-GarciaL.PatallE. A. (2016). Motivation. In CornoL.AndermanE. M. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 91–103). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
35.
LiuW. C.WangC. K. J.ParkinsE. J. (2005). A longitudinal study of students’ academic self-concept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X42239
36.
LüfteneggerM.KollmayerM.BergsmannE.JöstlG.SpielC.SchoberB. (2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095075
37.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (Version 8). Author.
38.
MagezW.TierensM.Van HuynegemJ.Van ParijsK.DecaluwéV.BosA. (2015). CoVaT-CHC Basisversie: Cognitieve vaardigheidstest volgens het CHC-model [CoVaT-CHC: Cognitive ability test based on the CHC-model.]. P. C. T. More).
39.
MakelM.SnyderK.ThomasC.MaloneP.PutallazM. (2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 203–212.
MidgleyC.ArunkumarR.MaehrM. (1996). “If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a reason”: Predictors of adolescents’ use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 423–434.
42.
Musu-GilletteL. E.WigfieldA.HarringJ. R.EcclesJ. S. (2015). Trajectories of change in students’ self-concepts of ability and values in math and college major choice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(4), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1057161
43.
NaginD. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.139
44.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
45.
ObergriesserS.StoegerH. (2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003
46.
PomerantzE. M.KempnerS. G. (2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2040–2046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031840
47.
PreckelF.HollingH.VockM. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20154
48.
RitchotteJ. A.MatthewsM. S.FlowersC. P. (2014). The validity of the achievement-orientation model for gifted middle school students: An exploratory study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534890
49.
RubensteinL. D.SiegleD.ReisS. M.MccoachD. B.BurtonM. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620
50.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
51.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194
52.
RamosA.LavrijsenJ.SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.SypreS.VerschuerenK. (2021). Profiles of maladaptive school motivation among high-ability adolescents: A person-centered exploration of the motivational Pathways to Underachievement model. Journal of Adolescence, 88, 146–161.
53.
SnyderK.FongC.PainterJ.PittardC.BarrS.PatallE. (2019). Interventions for academically underachieving students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 1–22.
54.
SatorraA.BentlerP. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514.
SkinnerE.FurrerC.MarchandG.KindermannT. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
57.
SnyderK. E.AdelsonJ. L. (2017). The development and validation of the Perceived Academic Underachievement Scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268087
58.
SnyderK. E.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.835597
59.
VansteenkisteM.MouratidisA. (2016). Emerging trends and future directions for the field of motivation psychology. Psychologica Belgica, 56(3), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.354
60.
VanwynsbergheG.VanlaarG.Van DammeJ.De FraineB. (2016). Long-term effects of primary schools on educational positions of students 2 and 4 years after the start of secondary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(2), 167–190. http://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1245667
61.
VerhoevenJ.VerbeeckB. (1999). The educational system in Belgium—Flemish community. EURYDICE, Ministry of the Flemish Community, Education Department, Education Policy Coordination Division.
62.
VermoteB.AeltermanN.BeyersW.AperL.BuysschaertF.VansteenkisteM. (2020). The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: A circumplex approach. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09827-5
63.
Von EyeA.BogatA. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 390–420.
64.
WhiteS.GrahamL.BlaasS. (2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.001
65.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
66.
WoutersS.VerschuerenK.BriersV.JanssenR. (2016). Development and validation of a Self-esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
