Objective/Research Question: For decades doctoral community college leadership programs have prepared students for the challenges and rewards in steering community college campuses, yet minimal scholarship has explored these programs’ efficacy in serving their students. This study explores community college leaders’ motivations in starting, learning experiences during, and takeaways following participation in doctoral community college leadership programs. Methods: This narrative inquiry study draws on action learning as the theoretical framework and entails interviews with 19 community college administrators who graduated from doctoral community college leadership programs. Results: Findings are threefold, each related to the distinct pieces associated with the research questions at hand. Students’ motivations for enrolling in programing stem from financial and geographic accessibility, institutional credibility, personal fulfillment, and desires to advance their careers. During their time in programs, students benefited from curriculum that prepared them for their dissertations, cohort-based approaches that afforded community, and applicable assignments and activities that directly related to their roles as community college practitioners. Following their doctorate, students reflected on the value of having this degree for propelling their careers and recommended opportunities for programmatic improvement. Conclusion/Contributions: These findings offer new perspective into what doctoral community college leadership programs accomplish in supporting students’ objectives and professional practices, and also unveil ideas toward programmatic adjustments.
AbricaE. J.Hatch-TocaimazaD. K.AbricaB. (2020). Sueños de los flyover states: Narratives of Latino males in the Great Plains. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(3), 224–237.
2.
American Association for Community Colleges. (2020). Trends in community college enrollment and completion data. Author.
AmeyM. J. (2006). Breaking tradition, new community college leadership programs meet 21st century needs. American Association for Community Colleges.
5.
AmeyM. J. (2007). Community college programs growth and development since the Kellogg era. In WrightD.MillerM. T. (Eds.), Training higher education policy makers and leaders, a graduate program perspective (pp. 53–66). Information Age Publishers.
6.
BartlettJ. E.BartlettM. E.DolfiJ. J.JaegerA. J.ChapmanD. D. (2018). Redesigning the education doctorate for community college leaders: Generation, transformation, and use of professional knowledge and practice. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3(2), 59–67.
7.
BellJ. S. (2002). Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 207–213.
8.
BistaK. (2014). Cohort-based doctoral programs: What we have learned over the last 18 years. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 1–20. https://doi:10.28945/1941
9.
BoldC. (2012). Using narrative in research. Sage.
10.
BoshykY. (Ed.). (2002). Action learning worldwide: Experiences of leadership and organizational development. Palgrave-Macmillan.
11.
BourkeB. (2007). Cohort graduate programs: Fostering communities of learners in the 21st century. In WrightD.MillerM. T. (Eds.), Training higher education policy makers and leaders (pp. 65–74). Information Age.
12.
BrayN. (2007). Core curricula for American higher education programs. In WrightD. W.MillerM. T. (Eds.), Training higher education policy makers and leaders, a graduate program perspective (pp. 109–120). Information Age.
13.
BrownL.MartinezM.DanielD. (2002). Community college leadership preparation: Needs, perceptions, and recommendations. Community College Review, 30(1), 45–73.
14.
BoshykY. (Ed.). (2002). Action learning worldwide: Experiences of leadership and organizational development. Springer.
15.
BussR. R.ZamboR.ZamboD.PerryJ. A.WilliamsT. R. (2017). Faculty members’ responses to implementing re-envisioned EdD programs. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1624–1640.
16.
CardK.ChambersC. R.FreemanS.Jr. (2016). Is there a core curriculum across higher education doctoral programs?International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 127.
17.
CardosoS.SantosS.DiogoS.SoaresD.CarvalhoT. (2022). The transformation of doctoral education: A systematic literature review. Higher Education, 84, 885–908.
18.
ClandininD. J.PushorD.OrrA. M. (2007). Navigating sites for narrative inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 21–35.
19.
ConnellyF. M.ClandininD. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. In GreenJ. L.CamilliG.ElmoreP. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (3rd ed., pp. 477–487). Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
CrossonP. H.NelsonG. M. (1986). A profile of higher education doctoral programs. Review of Higher Education, 9(3), 335–357.
DresselP.MayhewL. B. (1974). Higher education as a field of study. Jossey-Bass.
23.
EbbersL.ConoverK. S.SamuelsA. (2010). Leading from the middle: Preparing leaders for new roles. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2010(149), 59–64.
24.
EddyP. L.Garza MitchellR. L. (2017). Preparing community college leaders to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Journal for the Study of Postsecondary and Tertiary Education, 2, 127.
25.
HullJ. R.KeimM. C. (2007). Nature and status of community college leadership development programs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(9), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920600851621
26.
IvankovaN. V.StickS. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distribute doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48, 93–135.
27.
JuszkiewiczJ. (2020, July). Trends in community college enrollment and completion data, Issue 6. American Association of Community Colleges.
28.
KeimM. C. (1994). Graduate preparation programs in community college education. Community College Review, 22(1), 53–61.
LatzA. O.OzakiC. C.RoyerD. W.HornakA. M. (2017). Student affairs professionals in the community college: Critically examining preparation programs from a social justice lens. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(11), 733–746.
31.
LinX.GaoL. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169–179.
32.
MarquardtM.BanksS. (2010). Theory to practice: Action learning. Advances in Human Resource Development, 12(2), 159–162.
33.
MarquardtM.LeonardH. S.FreedmanA.HillC. (2009). Action learning for developing leaders and organizations: Principles, strategies, and cases. American Psychological Association.
34.
MartinQ.III. (2021). Preparing the next generation of community college leaders: The role of community college leadership programs. The Community College Enterprise, 27(2), 9–19.
35.
MelidonaD.CecilB. G.CassellA.ChessmanH. M. (2023). The American college president: 2023 Edition. American Council on Education.
36.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
37.
NelsonG. M. (1987, November21–24). Administration as a field of study: Course requirements in selected higher education areas of specialization. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Baltimore, MD.
38.
NyuntG.BrownD.JensenA.SchaeferC. (2023). Motivations to pursue an Ed.D. in higher education: A qualitative case study. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 60(5), 688–701.
39.
PedlerM. (1996). Action learning for managers. Lemos & Crane.
RaelinJ. A. (2009). Seeking conceptual clarity in the action modalities. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 6, 17–24.
42.
SahaS. M.PrantyS. A.RanaM. J.IslamM. J.HossainM. E. (2022). Teaching during a pandemic: Do university teachers prefer online teaching?Heliyon, 8(1), e08663.
43.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
44.
SmithD. A.FoxE. C.HarbourC. P. (2020). Integrating AACC’s Competencies for community college leaders into community college leadership graduate programs. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 27(1), 117–126.
45.
TownsendB. K. (1990). Doctoral study in the field of higher education. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education handbook of theory and research (pp. 161–199). Agathon.
46.
TownsendB. K.WieseM. (1992). The value of a doctorate in higher education for student affairs administrators. NASPA Journal, 30(1), 51–58.
TullA. (2007). The use of graduate certificates in the training of higher education policy makers and leaders. In WrightD. W.MillerM. T. (Eds.), Training higher education policy makers and leaders, a graduate program perspective (pp. 121–136). Information Age.
49.
ZamboR.ZamboD.BussR. R.PerryJ. A.WilliamsT. R. (2014). Seven years after the call: Students’ and graduates’ perceptions of the re-envisioned Ed.D. Innovative Higher Education, 39(2), 123–137.
