This article examines the racial equity of transfer incentive policies by responding to the research question: How do students of differing races and ethnicities vary in their opportunity to benefit from transfer incentive policies?
Methods:
We utilized a mixed-methods approach, grounded in Critical Race Theory (CRT). This study included an analysis of state policies’ components and mechanisms to consider whether they are grounded in racially unjust assumptions. The critical policy analysis is combined with a QuantCrit analysis of national data from the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS) to understand how identified aspects of the policies would affect students of differing races/ethnicities.
Results:
Our critical policy discourse analysis demonstrates that states’ transfer incentive policies could foster racial inequity through the requirements students must meet (e.g., full-time status, being under the age of 24) and assumptions about what students may know or need regarding transfer. The QuantCrit analysis revealed that many transfer incentive requirements from the policy analysis findings would have a disproportionately negative effect on racially minoritized students’ transfer eligibility. Together, findings and results illustrate how transfer incentives can contribute to educational inequity for racially minoritized students via color-evasive and meritocratic policies.
Conclusions/Contributions:
Implications include policy reform needed for the development of incentives aligned with closing the racial transfer gap and focused on incentivizing 2- and 4-year institutions in improving the transfer rates of racially minoritized students.
Acevedo-GilN.SantosR. E.AlonsoL. L.SolórzanoD. G. (2015). Latinas/os in community college developmental education: Increasing moments of academic and interpersonal validation. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192715572893
3.
Acevedo-GilN.ZerqueraD. D. (2016). Community college first-year experience programs: Examining student access, experience, and success from the student perspective. New Directions for Community Colleges, 175, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20213
4.
AnB.TaylorJ. (2015). Are dual enrollment students college ready? Evidence from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1781
5.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
BaberL. D.Zamani-GallaherE. M.StevensonT. N.PorterJ. (2019). From access to equity: Community colleges and the social justice imperative. In PaulsenM.PernaL. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 34, pp. 203–240). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03457-3_5
8.
BellD. (2009). Who’s afraid of critical race theory? In TaylorE.GillbornD.Ladson-BillingsG. (Eds.), Foundations of critical race theory in education (pp. 37–50). Routledge.
9.
ChaseM. M.DowdA. C.PazichL. B.BensimonE. M. (2014). Transfer equity for “minoritized” students: A critical policy analysis of seven states. Educational Policy, 28(5), 669–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812468227
10.
ChenX.SimoneS. (2016, September). Remedial coursetaking at U.S. public 2- and 4-year institutions: Scope, experiences, and outcomes (NCES 2016-405). U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Statistics.
11.
ColbyS.OrtmanJ. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060 population estimates and projections. US Census Bureau.
12.
CovarrubiasA.VélezV. (2013). Critical race quantitative intersectionality: An anti-racist research paradigm that refuses to “let the numbers speak for themselves.” In LynnM.DixsonA. D. (Eds.) Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 290–306). Routledge.
13.
CrenshawK. (1988). Race, reform and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341398
14.
CrenshawK. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 14, 139–167. http://legal-forum.uchicago.edu/
15.
CrispG.NuñezA. (2014). Understanding the racial transfer gap: Modeling underrepresented minority and nonminority students’ pathways from two-to four-year institutions. The Review of Higher Education, 37, 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0017
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.SchutzP. A. (2018). Critical race mixed methodology: Designing a research study combining critical race theory and mixed methods research. In DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.ChapmanT. K.SchutzP. A. (Eds.), Understanding critical race research methods and methodologies: Lessons from the field (pp. 166–180). Routledge.
18.
DelgadoR. (Ed.). (1995). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Temple University Press.
19.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2000). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Temple University Press.
20.
DolmageJ. T. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press.
21.
FoxH. L.Zamani-GallaherE. M. (2018). Exploring equity in early postsecondary education. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2018(181), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20289
GarciaN. M.LópezN.VélezV. N. (2018). QuantCrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675
24.
GarciaN. M.MayorgaO. J. (2018). The threat of unexamined secondary data: A critical race transformative convergent mixed methods. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377415
25.
GillbornD.WarmingtonP.DemackS. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
26.
GlynnJ. (2019). Persistence: The success of students who transfer from community colleges to selective four-year institutions. https://www.jkcf.org/research/persistence/
27.
Goldrick-RabS. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for improving community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 437–469. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310370163
28.
Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2017). Students need more information to help reduce challenges in transferring college credits (No. GAO-17-574). United States Government Accountability Office.
29.
GriffinK. A.MuseusS. D. (Eds.). (2011). Using mixed methods approaches to study intersectionality in higher education (New Directions in Institutional Research, No. 151). Jossey-Bass.
30.
GuinierL. (2015). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Beacon Press.
31.
HannenmannL.HazenbushM. (2014). On the move: Supporting student transfer. An overview of postsecondary transfer policies and programs across New England. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590820
32.
HarperS. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0047
33.
HellerD. E.MarinP. (Eds.). (2002). Who[m] should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships. Harvard Civil Rights Project. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED468845
IversonS. V. (2007). Camouflaging power and privilege: A critical race analysis of university diversity policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 586–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x07307794
36.
JaggarsS. S.BickerstaffS. (2018). Developmental education: The evolution of research and reform. In PaulsenM. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 469–503). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_10
37.
JainD.BernalS.LuceroI.HerreraA.SolórzanoD. (2016). Toward a critical race perspective of transfer: An exploration of a transfer receptive culture. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(12), 1013–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1213674
38.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709796-2
39.
LaSotaR. R.ZumetaW. (2015). What matters in increasing community college students’ upward transfer to the baccalaureate degree: Findings from the beginning postsecondary study 2003–2009. Research in Higher Education, 57, 152–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9381-z
40.
LópezN.ErwinC.BinderM.ChavezM. J. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Advancing quantitative methods in higher education using critical race theory and intersectionality. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1375185
41.
MamiseishviliK.DeggsD. M. (2013). Factors affecting persistence and transfer of low-income students at public two-year institutions. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15, 409–432. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.15.3.f
42.
Martinez-WenzlM.MarquezR. (2012). Unrealized promises: Unequal access, affordability, and excellence at community colleges in Southern California. The Civil Rights Project.
43.
MatsudaM. J.LawrenceC. R.DelgadoR.CrenshawK. W. (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory assaultive speech, and the First Amendment. Westview Press.
44.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). SAGE.
45.
McCoyD.RodricksD. (2015). Critical race theory in higher education: 20 years of theoretical and research innovations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 41(3), 1–117.
46.
OmiM.WinantH. (2014). The theory of racial formation in the United States. Routledge.
47.
ParkerL. (2003). Critical race theory and its implications for methodology and policy analysis in higher education desegregation. Counterpoints, 195, 145–180. www.jstor.org/stable/42978085
48.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
49.
Rios-AguilarC. (2014). The changing context of critical quantitative inquiry. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(158), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20048
50.
RoksaJ.KeithB. (2008). Credits, time, and attainment: Articulation policies and success after transfer. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 236–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708321383
51.
SablanJ. R. (2019). Can you really measure that? Combining critical race theory and quantitative methods. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218798325
52.
SernaG. R.WoulfeR. (2017). Social reproduction and college access: Current evidence, context, and potential alternatives. Critical Questions in Education, 8(1), 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129434
53.
ShapiroD.DundarA.HuieF.WakhunguP. K.YuanX.NathanA.HwangY. (2017). Tracking transfer: Measures of effectiveness in helping community college students to complete Bachelor’s degrees (Signature report no. 13). National Student Clearinghouse. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580214
54.
SimoneS. (2014). Transferability of postsecondary credit following student transfer or coenrollment—Statistical analysis report (p. 142). National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014163.pdf
55.
SmithM. (2010). Transfer and articulation. Education commission of the States.
56.
SolerM. C. (2020). Conceptualizations and strategies to enhance student success in the transfer swirl. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2020, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20422
57.
SolórzanoD. G. (1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping, and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(3), 5–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478088
58.
SolórzanoD. G.Delgado BernalD. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a critical race and LatCrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36(3), 308–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085901363002
59.
TateW. F. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22(1), 195–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167376
60.
TaylorJ. L.JainD. (2017). The multiple dimensions of transfer: Examining the transfer function in American higher education. Community College Review, 45(4), 273–293. http://doi.org/10.1177/0091552117725177
61.
WangX. (2012). Factors contributing to the upward transfer of baccalaureate aspirants beginning at community colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(6), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2012.11777272
62.
WeltonA. D.OwensD. R.Zamani-GallaherE. M. (2018). Anti-racist change: A conceptual framework for educational institutions to take systemic action. Teachers College Record, 120(14), 1–22.
WoodJ. L.PalmerR. T. (2016). Determinants of intent to transfer among black male community college students: A multinomial, multi-level investigation of student engagement. Teachers College Record, 118, 1–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1114953
65.
WorshamR. E.WhatleyM.LossJ. E. (2021). Opportunity for all? The differential impacts of North Carolina’s revised comprehensive articulation agreement by race/ethnicity. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(0), 28. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5385
66.
WrightJ.Whitaker RonaldW.IIKhalifaM.BriscoeF. (2020). The color of neoliberal reform: A critical race policy analysis of school district takeovers in Michigan. Urban Education, 55(3), 424–447. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918806943
67.
ZiliakS.McCloskeyD. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. University of Michigan Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
