The Mediating Effects of Student Services on Engagement Among First-Generation and Transfer Students Who Use Disability Services at Community Colleges

Abstract

Objective/Research Question: The purpose of this research is to explore the way use of student services can mediate engagement among first-generation and transfer students who use disability services at community colleges. The following research questions guided the current study: (1) At community colleges, how does frequency of use of student support services significantly relate to engagement among students who use disability services? (2) For first-generation and transfer students with disabilities, in what way does frequency of use of these services mediate engagement among this population? Method: Using Community College Survey of Student Engagement data, the relationship between frequency of use of student services and engagement behaviors was measured for 7,441 students using disability services. Through structural equation modeling, mediation effects of use of services on engagement for first-generation and transfer students with disabilities at community colleges were measured for academic challenge, support for learners, and student-faculty interaction. Results: Accounting for other student background characteristics, academic advising and career counseling were directly related to these measures and additive effects of this second service held for first-generation students with disabilities, but not transfers. Conclusion: These findings contribute to understanding which student services are successful pathways to increased engagement among students who use disability services. This research complements previous scholarship on increasing access of these services for this group, while suggesting further research may be conducted to understand quality of experience among student services.

Keywords

students with disabilities community colleges student engagement academic advising career counseling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abreu

Hillier

Frye

Goldstein

(2016). Student experiences utilizing disability support services in a university setting. College Student Journal, 50(3), 323–328.

Aune

(2000). Career and academic advising. In Belch

(Ed.), Serving students with disabilities (New Directions in Student Services, no. 91, pp. 55–67). Jossey-Bass.

Bahr

P. R.

(2012). Student flow between community colleges: Investigating lateral transfer. Research in Higher Education, 53(1), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9224-5

Berry

S. J.

Domene

J. F.

(2015). Supporting postsecondary students with sensory or mobility impairments in reaching their career aspirations. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(2), 78–88.

Bollen

K. A.

(1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons.

Bragg

D. D.

Kim

Barnett

E. A.

(2006). Creating access and success: Academic pathways reaching underserved students. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2006(135), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.243

Brown

T. A.

(2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.

Burgstahler

L. C.

Crawford

Acosta

(2001). Transition from two-year to four-year institutions for students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v21i1.253

Byrne

B. M.

(2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

10.

Campbell

Nutt

(2008). Academic advising in the new global century: Supporting student engagement and learning outcomes achievement. Peer Review: Emerging Trends and Key Debates in Undergraduate Education, 10(1), 4–7.

11.

Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2017). How benchmarks are calculated: CCSSE 2017–Present. The University of Texas at Austin (pp. 1–7).

12.

Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2019). Why CCSSE? The University of Texas at Austin. http://www.ccsse.org/.

13.

Chan

H. Y.

Wang

(2016). Interact for what? The relationship between interpersonal interaction based on motivation and educational outcomes among students in manufacturing programs at two-year technical colleges. Community College Review, 44(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552115612560

14.

Cheung

M. W.

(2007). Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336745

15.

Cohen

A. M.

Brawer

F. B.

Kisker

F. B.

(2014). The American community college (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

16.

Evans

N. J.

Broido

E. M.

Brown

K. R.

Wilke

A. K.

(2017). Disability in higher education: A social justice approach. Jossey-Bass.

17.

Flannery

K. B.

Yovanoff

Benz

M. R.

McGrath-Kato

(2008). Improving employment outcomes of individuals with disabilities through short-term postsecondary training. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728807313779

18.

Fleming

A. R.

Oertle

K. M.

Plotner

A. J.

(2017). Student voices: Recommendations for improving postsecondary experiences of students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(4), 309–326.

19.

Garis

(2014). Value-added career services: Creating college/university-wide systems. New Directions for Student Services, 2014(148), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20106

20.

Harper

(2010). An anti-deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 148, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.362

21.

Hatch

D. K.

(2012). Unpacking the black box of student engagement: The need for programmatic investigation of high impact practices. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(11), 903–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.690319

22.

Hatch-Tocaimaza

D. K.

(2017). The structure of student engagement in community college student success programs: A quantitative activity systems analysis. AERA Open, 3(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417732744

23.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

24.

Jones

W. A.

(2016). Factors correlated with the interactional diversity of community college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039153

25.

Kimball

Friedensen

Silva

(2017). Engaging disability: Trajectories of involvement for college students with disabilities. In Kim

Aquino

K. C.

(Eds.), Disability as diversity in higher education: Policies and practices to enhance student success (pp. 61–74). Routledge.

26.

Kimball

E. W.

Wells

R. S.

Ostiguy

B. J.

Manly

C. A.

Lauterbach

A. A.

(2016). Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. In Paulsen

(Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 91–156). Springer.

27.

Kreider

Bendixen

Lutz

(2015). Holistic needs of university students with invisible disabilities: A qualitative study. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 35(4), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2015.1020407

28.

Kuh

G. D.

(2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning inside the national survey of student engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380109601795

29.

Kuh

G. D.

(2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

30.

Kurth

Mellard

(2006). Student perceptions of the accommodation process in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 19(1), 71–84.

31.

Lindstrom

Downey-McCarthy

Kerewsky

S. D.

Flannery

K. B.

(2009). Supporting students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Human Service Education, 29(1), 4–13.

32.

Littlepage

Clemson

(2018). Transitional challenges for students with disabilities during a period of systemic imbalance. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 31(2), 149–159.

33.

Lombardi

Murray

Gerdes

(2012). Academic performance of first-generation college students with disabilities. Journal of College Student Development, 53(6), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0082

34.

Lombardi

Murray

Kowitt

(2016). Social support and academic success for college students with disabilities: Do relationship types matter? Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 44(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-150776

35.

Lyman

Beecher

M. E.

Griner

Brooks

Call

Jackson

(2016). What keeps students with disabilities from using accommodations in postsecondary education? A qualitative review. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(2), 123–140.

36.

Mamiseishvili

Koch

(2011). First-to-second-year persistence of students with disabilities in postsecondary institutions in the United States. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 54(2), 93–105.

37.

Mamiseishvili

Koch

(2012). Students with disabilities at 2-year institutions in the United States: Factors related to success. Community College Review, 40(4), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552112456281

38.

Mayhew

M. J.

Rockenbach

A. N.

Bowman

N. A.

Seifert

T. A. D.

Wolniak

G. C.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T.

(2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works (Vol. 3). Jossey-Bass.

39.

McCleary-Jones

(2008). Students with learning disabilities in the community college: Their goals, issues, challenges and successes. ABNF Journal, 19(1), 14–21.

40.

McClenney

K. M.

(2004). Redefining quality in community colleges: Focusing on good educational practice. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(6), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380409604239

41.

McClenney

K. M.

(2007). Research update: The community college survey of student engagement. Community College Review, 35(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552107306583

42.

McCormick

(2003). Swirling and double-dipping: New patterns of student attendance and their implications for higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 2003(121), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.98

43.

McCormick

McClenney

(2012). Will these trees “ever” bear fruit? A response to the special issue on student engagement. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0010

44.

Museus

S. D.

Jayakumar

U. M.

Robinson

(2012). Modeling racial differences in the effects of racial representation on 2-year college student success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(4), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.4.g

45.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

46.

Mytkowicz

Goss

(2012). Students’ perceptions of a postsecondary LD/ADHD support program. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(4), 345–361.

47.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2018a). Characteristics and outcomes of undergraduates with disabilities. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018432.pdf

48.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2018b). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and postbachelor’s outcomes. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018421.pdf

49.

National Student Clearinghouse. (2012). Transfer and mobility: A national view of pre-degree movement at postsecondary institutions. Author. https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/NSC_Signature_Report_2.pdf

50.

Newman

L. A.

Madaus

J. W.

(2015). Reported accommodations and supports provided to secondary and postsecondary students with disabilities: National perspective. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413518235

51.

Peña

E. V.

(2014). Marginalization of published scholarship on students with disabilities in higher education journals. Journal of College Student Development, 55(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0006

52.

Peña

E. V.

Stapleton

L. D.

Schaffer

L. M.

(2016). Critical perspectives on disability identity. New Directions for Student Services, 2016(154), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20177

53.

Pike

G. R.

(2004). Measuring quality: A comparison of US News rankings and NSSE benchmarks. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015695.84207.44

54.

Shepler

D. K.

Woosley

S. A.

(2012). Understanding the early integration experiences of college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(1), 37–50.

55.

Snyder

de Brey

Dillow

S. A.

(2019). Digest of education statistics 2017: 53rd edition. National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education.

56.

Stage

F. K.

(Ed.). (2007). Using quantitative data to answer critical questions: New directions for institutional research. Jossey-Bass.

57.

Vaccaro

Kimball

E. W.

Moore

Newman

B. M.

Troiano

P. F.

(2018). Narrating the self: A grounded theory model of emerging purpose for college students with disabilities. Journal of College Student Development, 59(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2018.0003

58.

Vaccaro

Kimball

E. W.

Wells

R. S.

Ostiguy

B. J.

(2015). Researching students with disabilities: The importance of critical perspectives. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2014(163), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20084

59.

Walpole

Chambers

C. R.

Goss

(2014). Race, class, gender and community college persistence among African American women. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 7(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1515/njawhe-2014-0012

60.

Wang

Wickersham

Sun

Chan

H. Y.

(2017). Math requirement fulfillment and educational success of community college students: A matter of when. Community College Review, 45(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552116682829

61.

Zilvinskis

Dumford

(2018). The relationship between transfer student status, student engagement, and high-impact practice participation. Community College Review, 46(4), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552118781495