This case study examines why 2-year colleges struggle to increase the racial diversity of their faculty. Through interrogating hiring procedures and identifying reasonable expectations for diversity within a college faculty, ethical dilemmas and practical implications of efforts to increase the hiring of faculty members of color emerge.
AdamsM. C.WadsworthE. (Eds.). (1989). The role of the faculty in meeting the national need for African American, American Indian, and Latino scholars. Report of the Stony Brook Conference I. Stony Brook: State University of New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED327598)
BaileyT.JenkinsD.LeinbachT. (2005). What we know about community college low-income and minority student outcomes: Descriptive statistics from national surveys. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
6.
BeachL. R. (1997). The psychology of decision making: People in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
BellE.DrakefordW. (1992). A case study of the Black student peer mentor program at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and its policy implications. College Student Journal, 26, 381-386.
8.
BlackwellJ. E. (1981). Mainstreaming outsiders: The production of Black professionals. Bayside, NY: General Hall.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
BrintS.KarabelJ. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900-1985. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2009). Benchmarking and benchmarks: Effective practice with entering students. Austin, TX: Author.
13.
CheathamH. E.PhelpsC. E. (1995). Promoting the development of graduate students of color. In Pruitt-LoganA. S.IsaacP. D. (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population (New Directions for Student Services, No. 72, pp. 91-99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
DaltonJ. C.CrosbyP. C.ValenteA.EberhardtD. (2009). Maintaining and modeling everyday ethics in student affairs. In McClellanG. S.StringerJ., & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration (3rd ed., pp. 166-186) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Delgado BernalD.VillapandoO. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity and Excellence in Education, 35, 169-180.
16.
FuertesJ.CothranM.SedlacekW. (1991). A model for increasing Hispanic student involvement on U.S. campuses. College Student Affairs Journal, 11, 11-15.
HurtadoS.CarterD. F.SpulerA. (1996). Latino student transition to college: Assessing difficulties and factors in successful college adjustment. Research in Higher Education, 37, 135-157.
22.
JayakumarU. M.HowardT. C.AllenW. R.HanJ. C. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 538-563
23.
JohnsonC. E. (2005). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or casting shadow. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
KayesP. E.SingleyY. (2010, October13). Time for community colleges to lead on diversifying faculty. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://diverseeducation.com/article/14256/
25.
MerriamS. B. (2001). Case studies as qualitative research. In ConradC. F.HaworthJ. G.LattucaL. R. (Eds.), Qualitative research in higher education: Expanding perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 191-201). Boston, MA: Pearson.
26.
MillsC. (1997). The racial contract. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
MusilC. M. (Ed.). (1992). The courage to question: Women’s studies and student learning. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and National Women’s Studies Association.
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. (1998). Federal contract compliance manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
32.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
33.
RawlsJ. (1999). A theory of justice (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
34.
RawlsJ. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
35.
ReyesM. D. L.HalconJ. J. (1991). Practices of the academy: Barriers to access for Chicano academics. In AltbachP. G.LomoteyK. (Eds.), The racial crisis in American higher education (pp. 167-186). Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
RouseC. E. (1995). Democratization or diversion? The effect of community colleges on educational attainment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 217-224.
37.
SmithD. G. (1997). Diversity works: The emerging picture of how students benefit. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
38.
SolórzanoD.YossoT. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 23-44.
39.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
40.
TateD. S.SchwartzC. L. (1993). Increasing the retention of American Indian students in professional programs in higher education. Journal of American Indian Education, 33, 21-31.
41.
The Institute for College Access & Success. (2011). College InSight [Dataset]. Retrieved from http://www.college-insight.org
42.
TurnerC. S. V. (2002). Diversifying the faculty: A guidebook for search committees. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
43.
TurnerC. S. V.MyersS. L.Jr.CreswellJ. W. (1999). Exploring underrepresentation: The case of faculty of color in the Midwest. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 27-59.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2004). Performance and accountability report, FY2004. Washington, DC: Author.
46.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
YossoT. J.ParkerL.SolórzanoD. G.LynnM. (2004). From Jim Crow to affirmative action and back again: A critical race discussion of racialized rationales and access to higher education. Review of Research in Education, 28, 1-25.
