Guided by a bottom-up policy implementation framework, this study draws from semi-structured interviews of 14 campus-level administrators charged with implementing diversity policy at the University of Michigan to investigate how an affirmative action ban (Proposal 2) influenced their efforts in support of racial/ethnic diversity at the university. Our findings show that beyond contributing to declines in student body diversity, laws like Proposal 2 have negatively influenced work critical to the success of students of color on campus. The findings suggest institutions operating in an anti–affirmative action context would benefit from proactive policies and practices that empower administrators in legally restrictive environments and support conversation and action that directly address the ways race continues to matter on college campuses.
AllenW.SolorzanoD. (2001). Affirmative action, educational equity and campus racial climate: A case study of the University of Michigan Law School. La Raza Law Journal, 12, 237–455.
2.
BackesB. (2012). Do affirmative action bans lower minority college enrollment and attainment? Evidence from statewide bans. Journal of Human Resources, 47, 435–455.
3.
BellD. A. (2003). Diversity’s distractions. Columbia Law Review, 103, 1622–1633.
4.
BensimonE.MalcomL. (2012). Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
5.
BlumeG. H.LongM. C. (2014). Changes in levels in affirmative action in college admissions in response to statewide bans and judicial rulings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 228–252.
CarbadoD. W.HarrisC. I. (2008). The new racial preferences. California Law Review, 96, 1139–1214.
8.
ChangM.AstinA.KimD. (2004). Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates: Some consequences, causes, and patterns. Research in Higher Education, 45, 529–553.
EspenshadeT. J.RadfordA. W. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal: Race and class in elite college admission and campus life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Fisher v. University of Texas, 570 U.S._(2013).
17.
GaertnerM. N.HartM. (2013). Considering class: College access and diversity. Harvard Law and Policy Review, 7, 367–403.
18.
GarcesL. M. (2013a). Social science research and the courts: Considering post-Grutter v. Bollinger developments in higher education cases. Educational Policy, 27(4), 591–614.
19.
GarcesL. M. (2013b). Understanding the impact of affirmative action bans in different fields of studies. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 251–284.
20.
GarcesL. M.CogburnC. (in press). Navigating legal barriers while promoting racial diversity in higher education. In FrankenbergE.GarcesL. M.HopkinsM. (Eds.). Advancing integration for equity across the educational pipeline. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
GarcesL. M.Mickey-PabelloD. (2015). Racial diversity in the medical profession: The impact of affirmative action bans on underrepresented student of color matriculation in medical schools. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(2), 264–294.
23.
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003).
24.
GreenD. O. (2004a). Fighting the battle for racial diversity: A case study of Michigan’s institutional responses to Gratz and Grutter. Educational Policy, 18, 733–751.
25.
GreenD. O. (2004b). Justice and diversity: Michigan’s response to Gratz, Grutter, and the affirmative action debate. Urban Education, 39, 374–393.
GurinP. (1999). Expert report. “Gratz, et al. v. Bollinger, et al.” no. 97-75321 (E.D. Mich.); “Grutter, et al. v. Bollinger, et al.” no. 97-75928 (E.D. Mich.). Equity & Excellence in Education, 32(2), 36–62.
29.
GurinP. (2004). The educational value of diversity. In GurinP.LehmanJ. S.LewisE. (Eds.), Defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 97–188). Ann Arbor. MI: University of Michigan Press.
30.
GurinP.DeyE.HurtadoS.GurinG. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–366.
31.
HammerD.WildavskyA. (1993). The open-ended, semi-structured interview: An (almost) operational guide. In WildavskyA. (Ed.), Craftways: On the organization of scholarly work (pp. 57–101). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
32.
HinrichsP. (2012). The effects of affirmative action bans on college enrollment, educational attainment, and the demographic composition of universities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94, 712–722.
33.
HonigM. I. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central-office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357–383.
34.
HowellJ. S. (2010). Assessing the impact of eliminating affirmative action in higher education. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 113–166.
35.
HurtadoS.Clayton-PedersenA. R.AllenW. R.MilemJ. F. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 279–302.
36.
JayakumarU. M. (2008). Can higher education meet the needs of an increasingly diverse and global society? Campus diversity and cross-cultural workforce competencies. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 615–651.
KezarA. J. (2012). Shared leadership for creating campus cultures that support students of color. In JayakumarU. M.MuseusS. (Eds.), Creating campus cultures: Fostering success among racially diverse student populations (pp. 150–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
KidderW. C. (2003). The struggle for access from Sweatt to Grutter: A history of African American, Latino, and American Indian Law School Admissions, 1950–2000. Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal, 19, 1–42.
KurasakiK. S. (2000). Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods, 12, 179–194.
42.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). Race still matters: Critical race theory in education. In AppleM. W.AuW.GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 110–123). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
LaneJ. E. (1983). The concept of implementation. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 86(1), 17–40.
LevinJ. (2007). Nontraditional students and community colleges: The conflict of justice and neoliberalism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
LomaxR. J.MooreT. E.SmithC. B. (1995, April17). The Michigan mandate: Promise and progress. The University Record. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/~aaupum/affirm08.htm
48.
LongM. C. (2004). Race and college admissions: An alternative to affirmative action?Review of Economic and Statistics, 86(4), 1020–1033.
49.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
MosesM. S.ChangM. J. (2005). Toward a deeper understanding of the diversity rationale. Educational Researcher, 35(1), 6–11.
53.
MuseusS. D. (2014). The Culturally Engaging Campus Environments (CECE) Model: A new theory of college success among racially diverse student populations. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 189–227). New York, NY: Springer.
OrfieldG.LosenD.WaldJ.SwansonC. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: Urban Institute.
56.
ParkJ. J. (2013). When diversity drops: Race, religion, and affirmative action in higher education. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
57.
PascarellaE.BohrL.NoraA.TerenziniP. (1996). Is differential exposure to college linked to the development of critical thinking?Research in Higher Education, 37, 159–174.
58.
PollockM. (2004). Colormute: Race talk dilemmas in an American school. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
61.
RoseM. L. (2008). Proposal 2 and the ban on affirmative action: An uncertain future for the University of Michigan in its quest for diversity. Public Interest Law Journal, 17, 309–337.
62.
SabatierP.MazmanianD. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8, 538–560.
63.
Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 572 U.S._(2014).
64.
SingletonG. E. (2013). Courageous conversation about race: A field guide for achieving equity in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
65.
SkomsvoldP.RadfordA.BerknerL. (2011). Six-year attainment, persistence, transfer, retention, and withdrawal rates of students who began postsecondary education in 2003–04 (Web tables, NCES 2011-152). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
66.
SnowD.ZurcherL.SjobergG. (1982). Interviewing by comment: An adjunct to the direct question. Qualitative Sociology, 5, 285–311.
67.
StohrG. (2004). A Black and White case: How affirmative action survived its greatest legal challenge. Princeton, NJ: Bloomberg.
Wade-GoldenK.MatlockJ. (2010). Working through the challenge: Critical lessons learned for building and sustaining a robust institutional diversity culture. In NevilleH. A.HunttM. B.ChapaJ. (Eds.), Implementing diversity: Contemporary challenges and best practices at predominantly White universities (pp. 1–20). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Center on Democracy in a Multiracial Society.
WightmanL. F. (1997). The threat to diversity in legal education: An empirical analysis of the consequences of abandoning race as a factor in law school admission decisions. New York University Law Review, 72(1), 1–53.
