This special issue focuses on key factors facing community colleges that will influence future practice. Using today’s research, the authors showcase how findings on access; definitions of student success; the science, technology, and engineering pipeline; and finance create a context that guides policy development and decision making by institutional leaders.
AkinS. R. (2005). Institutional advancement and community colleges: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 6, 65-75.
2.
BaimeD.MullinC. (2010). Pell power. Community College Journal, 80(5), 38-42.
3.
BaldwinC.BensimonE. M.DowdA. C.KleimanL. (2011). Measuring student success. In HeadR. B. (Ed.), Institutional effectiveness (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 153, pp. 75-88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BersT. (2011). Program review and institutional effectiveness. In HeadR. B. (Ed.), Institutional effectiveness (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 153, pp. 63-73). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
CohenA.BrawerF. (2008). The American community college (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
EckelP. D.CookB. J.KingJ. E. (2009). The CAO census: A national profile of chief academic officers. Washington, DC: The American Council on Education.
7.
EddyP. L. (2010). Community college leadership: A multidimensional model for leading change. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
8.
KatsinasS. G.D’AmicoM. M.FriedelJ. N. (2011). Access and funding in public higher education—The 2011 national survey. Tuscaloosa, AL: The Education Policy Center at the University of Alabama.
9.
KennamerM. A.KatsinasS. G.SchumckerR. E. (2011). The moving target: Student financial aid and community college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 12, 87-103.
10.
MullinC. M. (2010). Rebalancing the mission: The community college completion challenge (AACC Policy Brief 2010-01PBL). Washington, DC: The American Association of Community Colleges.
11.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2011). Using community colleges to build a STEM-skilled workforce. Washington, DC: Author.
RomanoR. M.MillardT. (2006). If community college students are so poor, why do only 16.9% of them receive Pell Grants?Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 20, 321-337.
St. JohnE. P.ChungC. G.MusobaG. D.SimmonsA. B.WoodenO. S.MendezJ. P. (2004). Expanding college access: The impact of state finance strategies. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education.
16.
ToutsiC.NovakR. (2011). State governance action report 2011. Washington, DC: The Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
17.
VaughanG. B. (2005, October28). (Over)selling the community college: What price access?Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B12.
18.
Virginia Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2011, § 23-38.87:10 (2011).
19.
WeismanI. M.VaughanG. B. (2007). The community college presidency 2006. Washington, DC: Community College Press.