This qualitative study of a community college—university partnership employs network embeddedness theory to examine the processes involved in creating and sustaining partnerships to enhance transfer and baccalaureate attainment. In particular, this article describes the challenges inherent in partnership management and governance, the importance of involving faculty in transfer-partnership programs and activities, and the utility of community college—university transfer partnerships in the future. Findings have clear implications for research and practice.
American Council on Education. (1994). Strengthening transfer through academic partnerships. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Case, L.B. (1999). Transfer opportunity program. Written testimony [to the] Little Hoover Commission public hearing on community colleges (ED427824) . Sacramento, CA: Los Rios Community College District.
3.
Center for the Study of Community Colleges. ( 2001). National transfer assembly results— Update for 1995. Retrieved May 15, 2005, from http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/ccs/edinfos/edin0104.html
4.
Chatman, S. (2001, June). Take the community college route to a selective public university degree (ED457948). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Long Beach, CA.
5.
Clark, B.R. (1960). The “cooling out” function in higher education. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 569-576.
6.
Cohen, A.M. (1996). Orderly thinking about a chaotic system. In T. Rifkin (Ed.), Transfer and articulation: Improving policies to meet new needs. New directions for community colleges, no. 96 (pp. 25-34). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
7.
DiMaria, J.P. (1998). Creating model partnerships that help attract and retain students. Agreements between two-year and four-year colleges. A community college prospective of networking for student success (ED424888) . Warwick, RI: Community College of Rhode Island.
8.
Donovan, R., Shaier-Peleg, B., & Forer, B. (1987). Transfer: Making it work. A community college report. Washington, DC: Community College Press.
9.
Dyer, J.H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
10.
Eaton, J. (Ed.). (1992). Faculty and transfer: Academic partnerships at work. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
11.
Eckel, P., Hartley, M., & Affolter-Caine, B. (2004). Cooperating to compete: A campus leader's guide to developing curricular partnerships and joint programs . Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
12.
Fincher, M. (2002). Private university and community college strategic alliances: The case for cooperation. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26, 349-361.
13.
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.
Hebel, S. (2004, May 28). Reaching out for students, and money. University programs that provide college preparation are vulnerable when budgets get tight. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(38), A19.
16.
Ignash, J.M., & Townsend, B.K. (2000). Evaluating state-level articulation agreements according to good practice. Community College Review, 28(3), 1-21.
17.
Karabel, J. (1986). Community colleges and social stratification in the 1980s. In L. S. Zwerling (Ed.), The community college and its critics. New directions for community colleges , no. 54 (pp. 13-30). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
18.
Laumann, E.O., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P.V. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages . Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 455-484.
19.
Mahoney, J.R. (1997). The American community college: A perspective . In L. Lategan (Ed.), Introducing community colleges to South Africa: Regional, national, and international perspectives (pp. 1-16). South Africa: University of the Free State .
20.
Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
22.
Neal, D.C. (1988). Consortia and interinstitutional cooperation. New York: American Council on Education.
23.
Powell, W.W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1994). Networks and economic life . In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 368-402). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Rifkin, T. (2000). Improving articulation policy to increase transfer. Policy paper. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States, Center for Community College Policy.
25.
San Diego Community College District, Research and Planning. (2002). San Diego State University (SDSU) dual admission program: First semester assessment of students enrolled at SDCCD—Fall 2002 (ED479528). San Diego, CA: Author.
26.
Serban, A.M., & Friedlander, J. (2004). Developing and implementing assessment of student learning outcomes. New directions for community colleges , no. 126. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Wechsler, H. (1989). The transfer challenge: Removing barriers, maintaining commitment. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
28.
Windham, P., Perkins, G.R., & Rogers, J. (2001). Concurrent-use campuses: Part of the new definition of access. Community College Review, 29(3), 39-55.
