Objective: To transfer, students often must navigate complex and imperfect information about credit transfer, bureaucratic hurdles, and conflicting degree requirements. This study examined how administrators and transfer personnel think about institutional online transfer resources and examined community colleges’ online transfer information. Methods: For a sample of 20 Texas community colleges, we spoke to key transfer personnel about the information provided to students and reviewed college websites, assessing the ease of access and usefulness of online transfer information. We used a qualitative case study approach to triangulate findings from our data sources. Results: Approximately two thirds of colleges in the sample fell below the highest standard on our rubric for either ease of access or usefulness, indicating room for improvement at most institutions. Many personnel recognized the strengths and limitations of their college’s online information, though several were ambivalent about the need for improving online information, arguing that online information is not as promising an intervention as face-to-face advising. Conclusion/Contributions: Our research illustrates the need for colleges to develop and update their online information intentionally, determining which information students need to transfer (including transfer guides for partner programs/colleges) and how students might search for that information, and ensuring that necessary transfer information is available and up to date. The framework provided by our website review approach, coupled with a proposed rubric to assess ease of access and usefulness of transfer information, may guide institutions in their evaluation of their online transfer information.
AllenJ. M.SmithC. L.MuehleckJ. K. (2014). Pre- and post-transfer academic advising: What students say are the similarities and differences. Journal of College Student Development, 55, 353-367. doi:10.1353/csd.2014.0034
2.
AndersonG.SunJ. C.AlfonsoM. (2006). Effectiveness of statewide articulation agreements on the probability of transfer: A preliminary policy analysis. Review of Higher Education, 29, 261-291. doi:10.1353/rhe.2006.0001
3.
BahrP. R. (2008). Cooling out in the community college: What is the effect of academic advising on students’ chances of success?Research in Higher Education, 49, 704-732. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9100-0
4.
BaileyT. R.JaggarsS. S.JenkinsD. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674425934
5.
BaileyT. R.JenkinsD.FinkJ.CullinaneJ.SchuddeL. (2016). Policy levers to strengthen community college transfer student success in Texas: Report to the Greater Texas Foundation. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. doi:10.7916/D8JS9W20
6.
BerdahlR. O. (1971). Statewide coordination of higher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
7.
BerdahlR. O. (1999). Universities and governments in the 21st century: The US experience. In BraunD.MerrienF.-X. (Eds.), Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view (Vol. 53, pp. 59-77). Philadelphia, PA: J. Kingsley.
8.
Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2018). Show me the way: The power of advising in community colleges (2018 National Report). Austin, TX: Author.
9.
CrispG.NuñezA.-M. (2014). Understanding the racial transfer gap: Modeling underrepresented minority and nonminority students’ pathways from two- to four-year institutions. Review of Higher Education, 37, 291-320. doi:10.1353/rhe.2014.0017
10.
DaviesT. G.DickmannE. M. (1998). Student voices in the transfer process: Do we hear them? Do we listen?Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22, 541-557. doi:10.1080/1066892980220507
11.
DoughertyK.KienzlG. (2006). It’s not enough to get through the open door: Inequalities by social background in transfer from community colleges to four-year colleges. Teachers College Record, 108, 452-487. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00658.x
12.
FinkJ.JenkinsD. (2017). Takes two to tango: Essential practices of highly effective transfer partnerships. Community College Review, 45, 294-310. doi:10.1177/0091552117724512
13.
Garcia-LopezE.Garcia-CabotA.Manresa-YeeC.de-MarcosL.Pages-ArevaloC. (2017). Validation of navigation guidelines for improving usability in the mobile web. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 52, 51-62. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2017.01.011
14.
Government Accountability Office. (2017). Students need more information to help reduce challenges transferring credits (GAO-17-574). Washington, DC: Author.
15.
HagedornL. S. (2010). The pursuit of student success: The directions and challenges facing community colleges. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 181-218). Dordrecht, NL: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_5
16.
HerreraA.JainD. (2013). Building a transfer-receptive culture at four-year institutions. New Directions for Higher Education, 162, 51-59. doi:10.1002/he.20056
17.
HodaraM.Martinez-WenzelM.StevensD.MazzeoC. (2017). Exploring credit mobility and major-specific pathways: A policy analysis and student perspective on community college to university transfer. Community College Review, 45, 331-349. doi:10.1177/0091552117724197
18.
HornL.SkomsvoldP. (2011). Web tables: Community college student outcomes, 1994–2009 (NCES 2012-253). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
19.
HosslerD.ShapiroD.DundarA.ZiskinM.ChenJ.ZerqueraD.TorresV. (2012). Transfer & mobility: A national view of pre-degree student movement in postsecondary institutions (Signature Report No. 2). Herndon, VA: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.
20.
JaggarsS. S.FletcherJ. (2014). Redesigning the student intake and information provision processes at a large comprehensive community college (CCRC Working Paper No. 72). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. doi:10.7916/D8GQ6VWW
21.
JainD.BernalS.LuceroI.HerreraA.SolorzanoD. (2016). Toward a critical race perspective of transfer: An exploration of a transfer receptive culture. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40, 1013-1024. doi:10.1080/10668926.2016.1213674
22.
JainD.HerreraA.BernalS.SolorzanoD. (2011). Critical race theory and the transfer function: Introducing a transfer receptive culture. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 35, 252-266. doi:10.1080/10668926.2011.526525
23.
JenkinsD.FinkJ. (2016). Tracking transfer: New measures of institutional and state effectiveness in helping community college students attain bachelor’s degrees. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Aspen Institute, and the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. doi:10.7916/D8C24W80
24.
KhlaisangJ. (2017). Proposing a new pedagogy-based website design: A usability test with lifelong learners. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 1713-1735. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9514-9
25.
MargolinJ.MillerS. R.RosenbaumJ. E. (2013). The community college website as virtual advisor: A usability study. Community College Review, 41, 44-62. doi:10.1177/0091552112471844
26.
MaxwellJ. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
MonaghanD. B.AttewellP. (2015). The community college route to the bachelor’s degree. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 70-91. doi:10.3102/0162373714521865
28.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Profile of undergraduate students: 2011-12 (Table 1.1). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015167.pdf
29.
NodineT.JaegerL.VeneziaA.BraccoK. R. (2012). Connection by design: Students’ perceptions of their community college experiences. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541651.pdf
30.
PernaL. W.FinneyJ. E. (2014). The attainment agenda: State policy leadership in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 39, 170-172. doi:10.1353/rhe.2015.0047
31.
PersonA. E.RosenbaumJ. E.Deil-AmenR. (2006). Student planning and information problems in different college structures. Teachers College Record, 108, 374-396. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00655.x
32.
RootM. (2013). Essential elements of state policy for college completion. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
33.
RosenbaumJ. E.Deil-AmenR.PersonA. E. (2007). After admission: From college access to college success. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
34.
SchuddeL.BrownR. S. (2019). Understanding variation in estimates of diversionary effects of community college entrance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sociology of Education, 92, 247-268. doi:10.1177/0038040719848445
35.
SchuddeL.Goldrick-RabS. (2015). On second chances and stratification: How sociologists think about community colleges. Community College Review, 43, 27-45. doi:10.1177/0091552114553296
36.
SchuddeL.JabbarH.ChevalierA. (2018). To improve community college transfer in Texas, students need better information (PRC research & policy brief series). Austin, TX. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2152/71426
37.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011). The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit students’ progress at community college? (CCRC Working Paper No. 25). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
38.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2012). Information constraints and financial aid policy (NBER Working Paper No. 17811). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
ŞengelE. (2013). Usability level of a university web site. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 3246-3252. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.373
40.
SenieK. C. (2016). Implementing transfer and articulation: A case study of community colleges and state universities. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40, 269-216. doi:10.1080/10668926.2015.1038667
41.
ShapiroD.DundarA.HuieF.WakhunguP. K.YuanX.NathanA.HwangY. (2017, September). Tracking transfer: Measures of effectiveness in helping community college students to complete bachelor’s degrees (Signature Report No. 13). Herndon, VA: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.
42.
TaylorJ. L.JainD. (2017). The multiple dimensions of transfer: Examining the transfer function in American higher education. Community College Review, 45, 273-293. doi:10.1177/0091552117725177
43.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2014). Improving transfer to increase student success. Austin, TX: Author.
TownsendB. K.WilsonK. (2006). “A hand hold for a little bit”: Factors facilitating the success of community college transfer students to a large research university. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 439-456. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0052
46.
Van NoyM.TrimbleM.JenkinsD.BarnettE. A.WachenJ. (2016). Guided pathways to careers: Four dimensions of structure in community college career-technical programs. Community College Review, 44, 263-285. doi:10.1177/0091552116652939
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
