“Myths” on the Benefits of Punitive Sentencing Predict Public Support for the Punishment of Drug Crimes

Abstract

Building upon prior work, this experiment with a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 1,547) examines the influence of public beliefs about different “myths” surrounding the potential benefits of harsh drug sentencing on support for punitive sentencing policies for various drug crimes. Results show that increased public support for the use of harsh sentencing strategies for the serious trafficking of serious drugs appeared to be motivated by stronger beliefs about benefits for crime prevention, public safety, and public systems, rather than for public health. Decreased support for harsh sentencing strategies for minor trafficking and possession of marijuana was mediated by weaker beliefs about benefits for public health, crime prevention, public systems, and/or public safety. Overall, this research suggests that public beliefs about the potential benefits of punitive drug sentencing help to motivate their levels of support for different sentencing strategies, which should be considered when promoting sentencing reform efforts for drug crimes.

Keywords

drug crimes experiment public health public safety sentencing public opinion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Addiction Now. (2018). What should jail sentences for drug crimes be? This survey asked Americans. https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/jail-sentences-for-drugs-harsher-than-we-want/

Aharoni

Kleider-Offutt

H. M.

Brosnan

S. F.

(2020). The price of justice: Cost neglect increases criminal punishment recommendations. Legal And Criminological Psychology, 25(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12161

Auspurg

Hinz

(2014). Factorial survey experiments (Vol. 175). Sage Publications.

Austin

Eisen

L. B.

Cullen

Frank

Chettiar

Brooks

C. W.

(2017). How many Americans are unnecessarily incarcerated? Federal Sentencing Reporter, 29(3), 140–174.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Beckett

(1999). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. Oxford University Press.

Belenko

Peugh

(2005). Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug And Alcohol Dependence, 77(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.023

Belenko

Spohn

(2014). Drugs, crime, and justice. Sage.

Berryessa

C. M.

(2021). Public support for using “second chance” mechanisms to reconsider long-term prison sentences for drug crimes. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 34(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2021.34.1.71

10.

Berryessa

C. M.

(2022a). A dual-process approach to moral panic and public support for sex offender management policies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16700–NP16726. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211023490

11.

Berryessa

C. M.

(2022b). A tale of “second chances”: An experimental examination of popular support for early release mechanisms that reconsider long-term prison sentences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(4), 783–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09466-x

12.

Berryessa

C. M.

(2025). The role of moral panic in motivating public support for punitive drug sentencing. Contemporary Drug Problems, 52(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509251326114

13.

Bobo

L. D.

Thompson

(2006). Unfair by design: The war on drugs, race, and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 73(2), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2006.0010

14.

Bonczar

T. P.

(2019). Prevalence of Imprisonment in the US Population, 1974–2001. US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.

15.

Boyum

Reuter

(2005). An analytic assessment of US drug policy. (pp. 7–9). DC: AEI press.

16.

Brewer

P. R.

Gross

(2005). Values, framing, and citizens’ thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology, 26(6), 929–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00451.x

17.

Brownstein

H. H.

Baxi

H. R. S.

Goldstein

P. J.

Ryan

P. J.

(1992). The relationship of drugs, drug trafficking, and drug traffickers to homicide. Journal of Crime and Justice, 15(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1992.9721451

18.

Bunting

W. C.

Garcia

Edwards

(2013). The war on marijuana in black and white. American Civil Liberties Union.

19.

Caliman

C. R.

Berryessa

C. M.

(2025). Analyzing the impacts of race, addiction, drug type, and criminal record on public support for criminalized and medicalized sentencing approaches toward illegal drug use. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1–43.

20.

Call

Gordon

J. A.

(2016). Support for current sex offender management policies: A national survey of the perceptions of professionals. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 834–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9337-7

21.

Caulkins

J. P.

Kleiman

(2018). Lessons to be drawn from US drug control policies. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9376-3

22.

Caulkins

J. P.

Reuter

(2010). How drug enforcement affects drug prices. Crime and Justice, 39(1), 213–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/652386

23.

Cooney

Burt

C. H.

(2008). Less crime, more punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1086/592425

24.

Davis

T. L.

Severy

L. J.

Kraus

S. J.

Whitaker

J. M.

(1993). Predictors of sentencing decisions: The beliefs, personality variables, and demographic factors of juvenile justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(6), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01098.x

25.

Denham

B. E.

(2008). Folk devils, news icons and the construction of moral panics: Heroin chic and the amplification of drug threats in contemporary society. Journalism Studies, 9(6), 945–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802227811

26.

Durrant

Fisher

Thun

(2011). Understanding punishment responses to drug offenders: The role of social threat, individual harm, moral wrongfulness, and emotional warmth. Contemporary Drug Problems, 38(1), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/009145091103800107

27.

Fellner

(2014). An offer you can’t refuse: How US federal prosecutors force drug defendants to plead guilty. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26(4), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2014.26.4.276

28.

Fondacaro

M. R.

O'Toole

M. J.

(2015). American Punitiveness and mass incarceration: Psychological perspectives on retributive and consequentialist responses to crime. New Criminal Law Review, 18(4), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.477

29.

Forman

Jr. (2012). Racial critiques of mass incarceration: Beyond the new Jim Crow. NYUL Rev., 87, 21–69.

30.

Fortner

M. J.

(2013). The carceral state and the crucible of black politics: An urban history of the Rockefeller Drug Laws1. Studies in American Political Development, 27(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X13000011

31.

Frederick

(2017). Research on upper level drug trafficking: A review. Transnational Organized Crime, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315084565-16

32.

Garland

(2013). Penality and the penal state. Criminology, 51(3), 475–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12015

33.

Greberman

Berryessa

C M

(2024). Drug policy, drug war, and disparate sentencing. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.884

34.

Hlavacek

Casteleiro

Sperry

(2024). Substance use disorders. Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, 274–298. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003386179-14

35.

Hughes

Huby

(2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 37(4), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.x

36.

Jørgensen

Ø.

Nilsson

(2024). Why should we punish and how? The role of moral intuitions and personal worldviews for punitiveness and sentencing preferences. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2381673

37.

Kahan

D. M.

Braman

(2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale L. & Pol'y Rev, 24, 149–170.

38.

Klein

J. L.

McKissick

A. B.

(2019). Moral panics and community member perceptions regarding reductions in sex offender recidivism. Justice Policy Journal, 16(1), 1–24.

39.

Kohler-Hausmann

(2010). The attila the hun law": New York's rockefeller drug laws and the making of a punitive state. Journal of Social History, 44(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2010.0039

40.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Fairchild

A. J.

Fritz

M. S.

(2007). Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58(1), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542

41.

Mauer

(1999). Why are tough on crime policies so popular. Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev., 11, 9.

42.

Mauer

(2018). Long-term sentences: Time to reconsider the scale of punishment. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 87, 113–131.

43.

Meares

T. L.

(1997). Social organization and drug law enforcement. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 35, 191–227.

44.

Mears

D. P.

Cochran

J. C.

Cullen

F. T.

(2015). Incarceration heterogeneity and its implications for assessing the effectiveness of imprisonment on recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(7), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414528950

45.

Mitchell

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

(2017). The effectiveness of prison for reducing drug offender recidivism: A regression discontinuity analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9282-6

46.

Morning Consult. (2016). National Tracking Poll. Retrieved from: https://cdn3.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7052001/160812_topline_Vox_v1_AP.0.pdf

47.

Musto

D. F.

Korsmeyer

(2008). The quest for drug control: Politics and federal policy in a period of increasing substance abuse, 1963–1981. Yale University Press.

48.

Omori

M. K.

(2013). Moral panics and morality policy: The impact of media, political ideology, drug use, and manufacturing on methamphetamine legislation in the United States. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042613491101

49.

Pessar

S. C.

Smart

Naimi

Lira

Blanchette

Boustead

Pacula

R. L.

(2025). The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and r. Addiction, 120(1), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16663

50.

Petersilia

(2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.

51.

Pew Research Center. (2014). America’s New Drug Policy Landscape. Pew Research Center.

52.

Pew Research Center. (2020). U.S. Politics & Policy, America’s New Drug Policy Landscape. Pew Research Center.

53.

Pew Research Center. (2021). U.S. public divided over whether people convicted of crimes spend too much or too little time in prison. Pew Research Center.

54.

Pew Research Center. (2022a). Public’s Top Priority for 2022: Strengthening the Nation’s Economy. Pew Research Center.

55.

Pew Research Center. (2022b). Concern about drug addiction has declined in U.S., even in areas where fatal overdoses have risen the most. Pew Research Center.

56.

Pew Research Center. (2023). Americans overwhelmingly say marijuana should be legal for medical or recreational use. Pew Research Center.

57.

Pfaff

(2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration-and how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.

58.

Pickett

J. T.

(2019). Public opinion and criminal justice policy: Theory and research. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024826

59.

Resko

Ellis

Early

T. J.

Szechy

K. A.

Rodriguez

Agius

(2019). Understanding public attitudes toward cannabis legalization: qualitative findings from a statewide survey. Substance Use & Misuse, 54(8), 1247–1259.

60.

Reuter

(2013). Why has US drug policy changed so little over 30 years? Crime and Justice, 42(1), 75–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/670818

61.

Roberts

J. V.

Stalans

L. J.

Indermaur

Hough

(2002). Penal populism and public opinion: Lessons from five countries. Oxford University Press.

62.

Schlosser

(1998). The prison-industrial complex. The Atlantic Monthly, 282(6), 51–77.

63.

Siegel

(2018). A New Sensibility: An analysis of public opinion research on attitudes towards crime and criminal justice policy. Opportunity Agenda (2018).

64.

Singer

(2008). Drugs and development: The global impact of drug use and trafficking on social and economic development. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(6), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.12.007

65.

Sloas

L. B.

Atkin-Plunk

C. A.

(2019). Perceptions of balanced justice and rehabilitation for drug offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(7), 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403418762532

66.

Spohn

Holleran

(2002). The effect of imprisonment on recidivism rates of felony offenders: A focus on drug offenders. Criminology, 40(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00959.x

67.

Stuntz

W. J.

(2011). The collapse of American criminal justice. Harvard University Press.

68.

Subramanian

Delaney

(2014). Playbook for change? States reconsider mandatory sentences. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2014.26.3.198

69.

Tonry

(2014). Remodeling American sentencing: A ten-step blueprint for moving past mass incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(4), 503–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12097

70.

Travis

Western

Redburn

F. S.

(2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. National Academies.

71.

Vitiello

(2021). The war on drugs: Moral panic and excessive sentences. Cleveland State Law Review, 69(2), 441–483.

72.

Western

. (2006). Punishment and Inequality in America. Russell Sage Foundation.

73.

Zogby

(2008). The way we'll be: The Zogby report on the transformation of the American dream. Random House.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB