Building upon prior work, this experiment with a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 1,547) examines the influence of public beliefs about different “myths” surrounding the potential benefits of harsh drug sentencing on support for punitive sentencing policies for various drug crimes. Results show that increased public support for the use of harsh sentencing strategies for the serious trafficking of serious drugs appeared to be motivated by stronger beliefs about benefits for crime prevention, public safety, and public systems, rather than for public health. Decreased support for harsh sentencing strategies for minor trafficking and possession of marijuana was mediated by weaker beliefs about benefits for public health, crime prevention, public systems, and/or public safety. Overall, this research suggests that public beliefs about the potential benefits of punitive drug sentencing help to motivate their levels of support for different sentencing strategies, which should be considered when promoting sentencing reform efforts for drug crimes.
Addiction Now. (2018). What should jail sentences for drug crimes be? This survey asked Americans. https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/jail-sentences-for-drugs-harsher-than-we-want/
2.
AharoniE.Kleider-OffuttH. M.BrosnanS. F. (2020). The price of justice: Cost neglect increases criminal punishment recommendations. Legal And Criminological Psychology, 25(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12161
AustinJ.EisenL. B.CullenJ.FrankJ.ChettiarI.BrooksC. W. (2017). How many Americans are unnecessarily incarcerated?Federal Sentencing Reporter, 29(3), 140–174.
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
6.
BeckettK. (1999). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. Oxford University Press.
BelenkoS.SpohnC. (2014). Drugs, crime, and justice. Sage.
9.
BerryessaC. M. (2021). Public support for using “second chance” mechanisms to reconsider long-term prison sentences for drug crimes. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 34(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2021.34.1.71
10.
BerryessaC. M. (2022a). A dual-process approach to moral panic and public support for sex offender management policies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16700–NP16726. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211023490
11.
BerryessaC. M. (2022b). A tale of “second chances”: An experimental examination of popular support for early release mechanisms that reconsider long-term prison sentences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(4), 783–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09466-x
12.
BerryessaC. M. (2025). The role of moral panic in motivating public support for punitive drug sentencing. Contemporary Drug Problems, 52(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509251326114
13.
BoboL. D.ThompsonV. (2006). Unfair by design: The war on drugs, race, and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 73(2), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2006.0010
14.
BonczarT. P. (2019). Prevalence of Imprisonment in the US Population, 1974–2001. US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15.
BoyumD.ReuterP. (2005). An analytic assessment of US drug policy. (pp. 7–9). DC: AEI press.
16.
BrewerP. R.GrossK. (2005). Values, framing, and citizens’ thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology, 26(6), 929–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00451.x
17.
BrownsteinH. H.BaxiH. R. S.GoldsteinP. J.RyanP. J. (1992). The relationship of drugs, drug trafficking, and drug traffickers to homicide. Journal of Crime and Justice, 15(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1992.9721451
18.
BuntingW. C.GarciaL.EdwardsE. (2013). The war on marijuana in black and white. American Civil Liberties Union.
19.
CalimanC. R.BerryessaC. M. (2025). Analyzing the impacts of race, addiction, drug type, and criminal record on public support for criminalized and medicalized sentencing approaches toward illegal drug use. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1–43.
20.
CallC.GordonJ. A. (2016). Support for current sex offender management policies: A national survey of the perceptions of professionals. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 834–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9337-7
21.
CaulkinsJ. P.KleimanM. (2018). Lessons to be drawn from US drug control policies. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9376-3
22.
CaulkinsJ. P.ReuterP. (2010). How drug enforcement affects drug prices. Crime and Justice, 39(1), 213–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/652386
23.
CooneyM.BurtC. H. (2008). Less crime, more punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1086/592425
24.
DavisT. L.SeveryL. J.KrausS. J.WhitakerJ. M. (1993). Predictors of sentencing decisions: The beliefs, personality variables, and demographic factors of juvenile justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(6), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01098.x
25.
DenhamB. E. (2008). Folk devils, news icons and the construction of moral panics: Heroin chic and the amplification of drug threats in contemporary society. Journalism Studies, 9(6), 945–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802227811
26.
DurrantR.FisherS.ThunM. (2011). Understanding punishment responses to drug offenders: The role of social threat, individual harm, moral wrongfulness, and emotional warmth. Contemporary Drug Problems, 38(1), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/009145091103800107
27.
FellnerJ. (2014). An offer you can’t refuse: How US federal prosecutors force drug defendants to plead guilty. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26(4), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2014.26.4.276
28.
FondacaroM. R.O'TooleM. J. (2015). American Punitiveness and mass incarceration: Psychological perspectives on retributive and consequentialist responses to crime. New Criminal Law Review, 18(4), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.477
29.
FormanJ.Jr. (2012). Racial critiques of mass incarceration: Beyond the new Jim Crow. NYUL Rev., 87, 21–69.
30.
FortnerM. J. (2013). The carceral state and the crucible of black politics: An urban history of the Rockefeller Drug Laws1. Studies in American Political Development, 27(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X13000011
GrebermanEBerryessaC M (2024). Drug policy, drug war, and disparate sentencing. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.884
JørgensenØ.NilssonA. (2024). Why should we punish and how? The role of moral intuitions and personal worldviews for punitiveness and sentencing preferences. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2381673
37.
KahanD. M.BramanD. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale L. & Pol'y Rev, 24, 149–170.
38.
KleinJ. L.McKissickA. B. (2019). Moral panics and community member perceptions regarding reductions in sex offender recidivism. Justice Policy Journal, 16(1), 1–24.
39.
Kohler-HausmannJ. (2010). The attila the hun law": New York's rockefeller drug laws and the making of a punitive state. Journal of Social History, 44(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2010.0039
MauerM. (1999). Why are tough on crime policies so popular. Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev., 11, 9.
42.
MauerM. (2018). Long-term sentences: Time to reconsider the scale of punishment. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 87, 113–131.
43.
MearesT. L. (1997). Social organization and drug law enforcement. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 35, 191–227.
44.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.CullenF. T. (2015). Incarceration heterogeneity and its implications for assessing the effectiveness of imprisonment on recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(7), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414528950
45.
MitchellO.CochranJ. C.MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2017). The effectiveness of prison for reducing drug offender recidivism: A regression discontinuity analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9282-6
MustoD. F.KorsmeyerP. (2008). The quest for drug control: Politics and federal policy in a period of increasing substance abuse, 1963–1981. Yale University Press.
48.
OmoriM. K. (2013). Moral panics and morality policy: The impact of media, political ideology, drug use, and manufacturing on methamphetamine legislation in the United States. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042613491101
49.
PessarS. C.SmartR.NaimiT.LiraM.BlanchetteJ.BousteadA.PaculaR. L. (2025). The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and r. Addiction, 120(1), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16663
50.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
51.
Pew Research Center. (2014). America’s New Drug Policy Landscape. Pew Research Center.
52.
Pew Research Center. (2020). U.S. Politics & Policy, America’s New Drug Policy Landscape. Pew Research Center.
53.
Pew Research Center. (2021). U.S. public divided over whether people convicted of crimes spend too much or too little time in prison. Pew Research Center.
54.
Pew Research Center. (2022a). Public’s Top Priority for 2022: Strengthening the Nation’s Economy. Pew Research Center.
55.
Pew Research Center. (2022b). Concern about drug addiction has declined in U.S., even in areas where fatal overdoses have risen the most. Pew Research Center.
56.
Pew Research Center. (2023). Americans overwhelmingly say marijuana should be legal for medical or recreational use. Pew Research Center.
57.
PfaffJ. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration-and how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.
ReskoS.EllisJ.EarlyT. J.SzechyK. A.RodriguezB.AgiusE. (2019). Understanding public attitudes toward cannabis legalization: qualitative findings from a statewide survey. Substance Use & Misuse, 54(8), 1247–1259.
60.
ReuterP. (2013). Why has US drug policy changed so little over 30 years?Crime and Justice, 42(1), 75–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/670818
61.
RobertsJ. V.StalansL. J.IndermaurD.HoughM. (2002). Penal populism and public opinion: Lessons from five countries. Oxford University Press.
62.
SchlosserE. (1998). The prison-industrial complex. The Atlantic Monthly, 282(6), 51–77.
63.
SiegelL. (2018). A New Sensibility: An analysis of public opinion research on attitudes towards crime and criminal justice policy. Opportunity Agenda(2018).
64.
SingerM. (2008). Drugs and development: The global impact of drug use and trafficking on social and economic development. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(6), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.12.007
65.
SloasL. B.Atkin-PlunkC. A. (2019). Perceptions of balanced justice and rehabilitation for drug offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(7), 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403418762532
66.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2002). The effect of imprisonment on recidivism rates of felony offenders: A focus on drug offenders. Criminology, 40(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00959.x
67.
StuntzW. J. (2011). The collapse of American criminal justice. Harvard University Press.
68.
SubramanianR.DelaneyR. (2014). Playbook for change? States reconsider mandatory sentences. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2014.26.3.198
69.
TonryM. (2014). Remodeling American sentencing: A ten-step blueprint for moving past mass incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(4), 503–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12097
70.
TravisJ.WesternB.RedburnF. S. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. National Academies.
71.
VitielloM. (2021). The war on drugs: Moral panic and excessive sentences. Cleveland State Law Review, 69(2), 441–483.
72.
WesternB. (2006). Punishment and Inequality in America. Russell Sage Foundation.
73.
ZogbyJ. (2008). The way we'll be: The Zogby report on the transformation of the American dream. Random House.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
