Ethnographies of gentrification, by using interviews, suggest individual and group sentiments about it as a form of revitalisation are heterogenous, even within neighbourhoods experiencing it. Discerning variation and changes over time in citywide sentiments about gentrification, however, is a challenge. It requires city-level survey data, especially longitudinal data, which is scarce. We use novel data from Washington Post surveys of District of Columbia (i.e. Washington, DC) residents between 2000 and 2016 to test predictions of city-level gentrification opinions, deduced from neighbourhood-based ethnographies of gentrification. We observe and emphasise how, over time, race is consistently associated with opinion divergence about gentrification, including perceptions of its inequalities and consequences. Our findings demonstrate the value of citywide surveys for extending empirical findings from neighbourhood-level ethnographies of gentrification.
AschCMusgroveGD (2017) “We are headed for some bad trouble”: Gentrification and displacement in Washington, DC. In: HyraDPrinceS (eds) Capital Dilemma: Growth and Inequality in Washington, DCNew York, NY: Routledge, pp.1920–2014.
2.
AschCMusgroveGD (2019) Chocolate City: A History of Race and Democracy in the Nation’s Capital. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
AtkinsonR (2003) Introduction: Misunderstood saviour or vengeful wrecker? The many meanings and problems of gentrification. Urban Studies40(12): 2343–2350.
4.
AtkinsonR (2015) Losing one’s place: Narratives of neighbourhood change, market injustice and symbolic displacement. Housing Theory and Society32(4): 373–388.
5.
BaderMDM (2011) Reassessing residential preferences for redevelopment. City and Community10(3): 311–337.
6.
BoydM (2005) The downside of racial uplift: Meaning of gentrification in an African American neighborhood. City & Society17(2): 265–288.
7.
Brown-SaracinoJ (2009) A Neighborhood That Never Changes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CasellasJMcBrayerM (2019) From barrios to condos: The effects of gentrification on minority descriptive representation. The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics4(1): 216–255.
10.
ChouWDancygierR (2021) Why parties displace their voters: Gentrification, coalitional change, and the demise of public housing. The American Political Science Review115(2): 429–449.
11.
CrawfordNN (2019) Of suspicious minds: Race, scandal, and the DC mayoralty. Journal of Urban Affairs41(5): 679–699.
12.
DC Chamber of Commerce (2017) Twenty Years of Change Since the Revitalization Act. Washington, DC: DC Chamber of Commerce.
13.
DC Office of Latino Affairs (2013) Latinos in the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: DC Mayor’s Office on Latino Affairs.
14.
DoucetBKoendersD (2018) At least it’s not a ghetto anymore’: Experiencing gentrification and ‘false choice urbanism’ in Rotterdam’s Afrikaanderwijk. Urban Studies55(16): 3631–3649.
15.
EastonSLeesLHubbardP, et al. (2020) Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification. Urban Studies57(2): 286–306.
16.
Elliott-CooperAHubbardPLeesL (2020) Moving beyond Marcuse: Gentrification, displacement and the violence of un-homing. Progress in Human Geography44(3): 492–509.
17.
FallonKF (2021) Reproducing race in the gentrifying city: A critical analysis of race in gentrification scholarship. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City2(1): 1–28.
18.
FauntroyM (2010) Home rule for the District of Columbia. In: WaltersRTravisT-M (eds) Democratic Destiny and the District of Columbia. London: Lexington Books, pp.21-44.
19.
FreemanL (2006) There Goes the ‘Hood’: Views of Gentrification From the Ground Up. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Golash-BozaT (2023) Before Gentrification: The Creation of DC’s Racial Wealth Gap. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
GriffinJHajnalZNewmanB, et al. (2019) Political inequality in America: Who loses on spending policy? When is policy less biased?Politics Groups and Identities7(2): 367–385.
23.
HelmuthAS (2019) Chocolate city, rest in peace: White space-claiming and the exclusion of black people in Washington, DC. City and Community18(3): 746–769.
24.
HopkinsDJMcCabeKT (2012) After it’s too late: Estimating the policy impacts of black mayoralties in US cities. American Politics Research40(4): 665–700.
25.
HopkinsonN (2012) Farewell to chocolate city. New York Times, 23June.
26.
HunterMARobinsonZ (2018) Chocolate Cities: The Black Map of American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
HyraD (2015) The back-to-the-city movement: Neighbourhood redevelopment and processes of political and cultural displacement. Urban Studies52(10): 1753–1773.
28.
HyraD (2017) Race, Class, and Politics in the Cappuccino City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
HyraDPrinceS (2016) Capital Dilemma: Growth and Inequality in Washington, DC. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
JacksonJ (2015) The consequences of gentrification for racial change in Washington, DC. Housing Policy Debate25(2): 353–373.
31.
JafeH (2014) Will 2014 be the year DC elects a white mayor?The Washingtonian, 26February.
32.
KennedyMLeonardP (2001) Dealing With Neighborhood Change: A Primer on Gentrification and Policy Choices. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
33.
KernL (2016) Rhythms of gentrification: Eventfulness and slow violence in a happening neighbourhood. Cultural Geographies23(3): 441–457.
34.
LeesL (2016) Gentrification, race, and ethnicity: Towards a global research agenda?City and Community15(3): 208–214.
35.
LeesLLeyD (2008) Introduction to special issue on gentrification and public policy. Urban Studies45(12): 2379–2384.
36.
LeesLSlaterTWylyE (2013) Gentrification. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
LoderKStuartF (2023) Displacement frames: How residents perceive, explain and respond to un-homing in Black San Francisco. Urban Studies60(6): 1013–1030.
38.
MaherJT (2015) The capital of diversity: Neoliberal development and the discourse of difference in Washington, DC. Antipode47(4): 980–998.
39.
MartinL (2007) Fighting for control: Political displacement in Atlanta’s gentrifying neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review42(5): 603–628.
40.
MaurrasseD (2014) Listening to Harlem: Gentrification, Community, and Business. Milton Park: Routledge.
41.
McGirrESkaburskisADoneganiTS (2015) Expectations, preferences and satisfaction levels among new and long-term residents in a gentrifying Toronto neighbourhood. Urban Studies52(1): 3–19.
42.
MorelDNuamahSA (2020) Who governs? How shifts in political power shape perceptions of local government services. Urban Affairs Review56(5): 1503–1528.
43.
MorelloCKeatingD (2011) Number of black DC residents plummets as majority status slips away. The Washington Post, 24March.
44.
MullenbachLEBakerBLMowenAJ (2020) Construction and testing of the gentrification worldview instrument. Community Development51(4): 420–436.
45.
OwensMLBrownJR (2014) Weakening strong black political empowerment: Implications from Atlanta’s 2009 mayoral election. Journal of Urban Affairs36(4): 663–681.
46.
OwensMLDrake RodriguezABrownRA (2021) “Let’s get ready to crumble”: Black municipal leadership and public housing transformation in the United States. Urban Affairs Review57(2): 342–372.
47.
PattilloM (2007) Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
PrinceS (2014) African Americans and Gentrification in Washington, DC: Race, Class and Social Justice in the Nation’s Capital. Ashgate: Routledge.
49.
RichardsonJMitchellBFrancoJ (2019) Shifting Neighborhoods: Gentrification and Cultural Displacement in American Cities. Washington, DC: National Community Reinvestment Coalition.
50.
Rucks-AhidianaZ (2021) Racial composition and trajectories of gentrification in the United States. Urban Studies58(13): 2721–2741.
51.
Rucks-AhidianaZ (2022) Theorizing gentrification as a process of racial capitalism. City and Community21(3): 173–192.
52.
SaxenaNNgT (2011) The District’s Asian Americans: A Population Growing Out of Invisibility. Washington, DC: Mayor’s Office on Asian & Pacific Islander Affairs.
53.
ShinaultCMSeltzerR (2019) Whose turf, whose town? Race, status, and attitudes of Washington DC residents toward gentrification. Journal of African American Studies23: 72–91.
SturtevantL (2014) The new District of Columbia: What population growth and demographic change mean for the city. Journal of Urban Affairs36(2): 276–299.
SullivanDMBachmeierJD (2012) Racial differences in perceived disorder in three gentrifying neighborhoods. Advances in Applied Sociology02(03): 229–236.
58.
SummersB (2019) Black in Place: The Spatial Aesthetics of Race in a Post-Chocolate City. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
59.
TatianPLeopoldJOoE, et al. (2015) Affordable Housing Needs Assessment for the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
60.
TaverniseS (2011) Washington journal: A population changes, uneasily. New York Times, 17July, A9.
61.
TaylorM (2002) Harlem Between Heaven and Hell. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
62.
TaylorY (2015) Who Stays in the District? Who Leaves? Preliminary Findings From DC Tax Filers From 2004. Washington, DC: Office of Revenue Analysis, District of Columbia.
63.
TaylorY (2018) Taking Stock of the District’s Housing Stock. Washington, DC: DC Policy Center.
64.
TuttleS (2022) Place attachment and alienation from place: Cultural displacement in gentrifying ethnic enclaves. La Critica Sociologica48(3): 517–531.
65.
WaltersR (2010) Introduction. In: WaltersRTravisT-M (eds) Democratic Destiny and the District of Columbia. London: Lexington Books, pp.1–20.
66.
Washington Post (2022) Washington Post District of Columbia Poll, 02/02/2022 - 02/14/2022. Cornell University, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
