Drug policies and interventions require an ongoing understanding of the local demand for illegal drugs. How illegal drugs are distributed to consumers is critical in the demand process. To overcome barriers to purchasing illegal drugs, people utilize their peers to purchase substances for them. These brokered drug sales allow buyers to leverage their peer networks to make purchases. For brokers, this form of exchange allows them to obtain drugs for free. This drug acquisition strategy is underappreciated in understanding how local drug market's function.
Methods
This paper presents findings from a brief survey on brokering collected from a random sample (N = 241) of active illegal drug injectors recruited from two syringe services programs in Ohio, USA.
Results
Findings indicate that 30-day and lifetime brokering behavior is common (71% and 90% respectively). Respondents who brokered in the last 30 days (n = 181) purchased drugs for an average of 7 people and from an average of 4 different sellers. Among this group, over 84% indicated that they used drugs with the person they brokered for, 49% reported often or always inflating the price to the buyer, and 27% indicated they removed some drug before returning to the buyer.
Conclusion
Measuring brokering offers new insight on the dynamics of drug markets, how they operate, and ways to measure their activity. The demand for illegal drugs incorporates the increased use of a drug, changes in the use of different drugs, and/or a novel drug being used. Accessing drugs via brokering accommodates these dynamics. By including brokering in drug market activity, the concept and scope of illegal drug markets transform into networks and not places.
AdlerP. (1993). Wheeling and Dealing: An Ethnography of an Upper-Level Drug Dealing and Smuggling Community. Columbia University Press.
2.
BalighH. H.RichartzL. E. (1967). Vertical market structures. Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BeckerG. S.MurphyK. M.GrossmanM. (2006). The market for illegal goods: The case of drugs. Journal of Political Economy, 114(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/498918
BryanP. J.ChitwoodD. D.SmithP. C.KaneN.McBrideD. C. (1990). Reviewed work(s): “intravenous drug use and HIV infection in Miami”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, 4(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1990.4.1.02a00050
7.
CarrollJ. J.OstrachB.WilsonL.DunlapJ. L.GettyR.BennettJ. (2021, Nov). Drug induced homicide laws may worsen opioid related harms: An example from rural North Carolina. International Journal on Drug Policy, 97, 103406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103406
8.
CaulkinsJ. P. (2001). Drug prices and emergency room mentions for cocaine and heroin. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1446–1448. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1446
9.
CaulkinsJ. P. (2007). Price and purity analysis for illicit drug: Data and conceptual issues. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90(Supplement 1), S61–S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.014
CaulkinsJ. P.ReuterP. (2006). Illicit drug markets and economic irregularities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2004.08.002
12.
CaulkinsJ. P.ReuterP. (2010). How drug enforcement affects drug prices. Crime and Justice, 39(1), 213–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/652386
13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020). Drug overdose deaths remain high. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/deaths/. Accessed April 20, 2022.
14.
ChalmersJ.BradfordD.JonesC. (2010). The effect of methamphetamine and heroin price on polydrug use: A behavioural economics analysis in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21(5), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.06.002
15.
CiccaroneD. (2021). The rise of illicit fentanyls, stimulants and the fourth wave of the opioid overdose crisis. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 34(4), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000717
16.
CoomberR.MaherL. (2006). Street-Level drug market activity in Sydney’s primary heroin markets: Organization, adulteration practices, pricing, marketing and violence. Journal of Drug Issues, 36(3), 719–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260603600310
17.
CoomberR.MoyleL. (2014). Beyond drug dealing: Developing and extending the concept of ‘social supply’ of illicit drugs to ‘minimally commercial supply’. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2013.798265
18.
CoomberR.MoyleL. (2016). Reflections on three decades of research on ‘social supply’ in the UK. Friendly Business: International Views on Social Supply, Self-Supply and Small-Scale Drug Dealing, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10329-3_2
19.
CoomberR.MoyleL.SouthN. (2016). The normalisation of drug supply: The social supply of drugs as the “other side” of the history of normalisation. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2015.1110565
20.
CoomberR.TurnbullP. (2007). Arenas of drug transactions: Adolescent cannabis transactions in England—social supply. Journal of Drug Issues, 37(4), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260703700406
21.
CunninghamS.FinlayK. (2016). Identifying demand responses to illegal drug supply interdictions. Health Economics, 25(10), 1268–1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3213
22.
DaveD. (2006). The effects of cocaine and heroin price on drug-related emergency department visits. Journal of Health Economics, 25(5), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.08.003
23.
DeSimoneJ.FarrellyM. C. (2003). Price and enforcement effects of cocaine and marijuana demand. Economic Inquiry, 41, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/41.1.98
24.
DesJarlaisD.BobashevG.FeelemyerJ.McKnightC. (2022). Modeling HIV transmission among persons who inject drugs (PWID) at the “End of the HIV epidemic” and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 238, 109573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109573
25.
DornN.MurjiK.SouthN. (1991). Traffickers: Drug Markets and Law Enforcement (1st ed.). Routledge.
26.
FinlinsonH. A.ColonH. M.LopezM. S.RoblesR. R.CantJ. G. (2005). Injecting shared drugs: An observational study of the process of drug acquisition, preparation, and injection by Puerto Rican drug users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 37(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2005.10399747
27.
FurstR. T.CurtisR. S.JohnsonB. D.GoldsmithD. S. (1999). The rise of the street middleman/woman in a declining drug market. Addiction Research, 7(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359909004378
28.
GalletC. A. (2014). Can price get the monkey off our back? A meta-analysis of illicit drug demand. Health Economics, 23(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.2902
29.
GoldsteinP. J. (1981). Getting over: Economic alternatives to predatory crime among street drug users. In InciardiJ. A. (Ed.), The drug-crime connection (pp. 67–84). Sage.
HofferL. (2016). The space between community and self-interest: Conflict and the experience of exchange in heroin markets, In The Economics of Ecology, Exchange, and Adaptation: Anthropological Explorations (Research in Economic Anthropology, Vol. 36), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120160000036007
32.
HofferL. (2019). The fuzzy boundaries of illegal drug markets and why they matter, 229-239. In PickardH.AhmedS. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Science of Addiction. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN-13: 978-1138909281.
33.
HofferL. D.AlamS. J. (2013). “Copping” in heroin markets: The hidden information costs of indirect sales and why they matter. Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction - 6th International Conference, SBP 2013. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7812 2013, ISBN 978-3-642-37209-4, Washington, DC.
34.
HofferL. D.BobashevG.MorrisR. J. (2009). Researching a local heroin market as a complex adaptive system. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3-4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9268-2
35.
HoughM.WarburtonH.FewB.MayT.ManL.-H.WittonJ.TurnbullP. J. (2003). A growing market: The domestic cultivation of cannabis. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
36.
HughesP. H.JaffeJ. H. (1971). The heroin copping area. A location for epidemiological study and intervention activity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24(5), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1971.01750110006002
37.
JohnsonB. D.GoldsteinP. J.PrebleE.SchmeidlerJ.LiptonD. S.SpuntB.MillerT. (1985). Taking care of business: The economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington Books.
38.
JohnsonB. D.GolubA. (2007). The potential for accurately measuring behavioral and economic dimensions of consumption, prices, and markets for illegal drugs. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90(Supplement 1), S16–S26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.005
39.
KoesterS. (1994). Copping, running, and paraphernalia laws: Contextual variables and needle risk behavior among injection drug users in denver. Human Organization, 53(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.53.3.g86872408528021h
40.
MoellerK.SandbergS. (2015, May18). Credit and trust: Management of network ties in illicit drug distribution. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(5), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815583912
41.
MoyleL.CoomberR. (2015). Earning a score: An exploration of the nature and roles of heroin and crack cocaine ‘user-dealers’. British Journal of Criminology, 55(3), 534–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu087
42.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (1993). Risk behavior assessment (3rd ed.). Author.
43.
NeedleR.MillsA. R. (1994). Drug procurement practices of the out-of-treatment chronic drug abuser. Report No. 94-3820, NIH publication.
ParkerH. (2000). How young britons obtain their drugs: Drugs transactions at the point of consumption. Crime Prevention Studies, 11, 59–82.
46.
PayneJ.ManningM.FlemingC.PhamH.T. (2020). The price elasticity of demand for illicit drugs: A systematic review. Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04800
PrebleE.CaseyJ. (1969). Taking care of business: The heroin user’s life on the street. International Journal of the Addictions, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826086909061998
49.
SouthN. (2004). Managing work, hedonism and ‘the borderline’ between the legal and illegal markets: Two case studies of recreational heavy drug users. Addiction Research & Theory, 12(6), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350412331323074
50.
SpiroE. S.ActonR. M.ButtsC. T. (2013). Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks. Social Networks, 35(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.02.001
51.
TaylorM.PotterG. R. (2013). From ‘social supply’ to ‘real dealing’: Drift, friendship, and trust in drug-dealing careers. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(4), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612474974
52.
Van OursJ. C. (1995). The price elasticity of hard drugs: The case of opium in the Dutch east indies, 1923–1938. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/261983
53.
WainwrightT. (2016). Narconomics: How to Run a Drug Cartel, Public Affairs.
54.
WattsD. J.StrogatzS. H. (1998, Jun 4). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
