Utilizing an ethnically diverse snowball sample of 31 current or former marijuana smokers, this paper uses recent data to update and expand Howard S. Becker's (J953) theory of using marijuana for pleasure. Although the main tenets of Becker's social-process-based theory of marijuana use have survived the test of time amazingly well, the data suggest that some significant aspects of the theory need to be updated. Most users become intoxicated the first time they smoke marijuana, many no longer have to learn that they are intoxicated through social interaction with other users, and most immediately find the experience pleasurable. Historical changes in marijuana “scenes,” rather than fundamental weaknesses, necessitate revisions in Becker's theory.
AdlerP. & AdlerP. (1996). Tinydopers: A Case Study of Deviant Socialization. In KellyD. H. (Ed.), Deviant Behavior: A Text Reader in Sociology of Deviance (pp. 226–242). New York: St. Martin's Press.
2.
AgarM. (1973). Ripping and Running; A Formal Ethnography of Urban Heroin Addicts. New York: Seminar Press.
3.
BeckerH. S. (1953). Becoming a Marihuana User. The American Journal of Sociology, 59, 395–403.
4.
BourgoisP. I. (1995). In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. Cambridge [England], New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ChalsmaA. L. & BoyumD. (1994). Marijuana Situation Assessment. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
6.
FaupelC. E. (1991). Shooting Dope: Career Patterns of Hard-Core Heroin Users. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
7.
HirschM. L.ConfortiR. W. & GraneyC. J. (1990). The Use of Marijuana for Pleasure: A Replication of Howard S. Becker's Study of Marijuana Use. Handbook of replication research in the behavioral and social sciences. [Special Issue.] Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 497–510.
8.
HuntD. (1997). A Selected Bibliography on the Drug Use(r) “Career.”Substance Use and Misuse, 32(3), 283–291.
9.
InciardiJ.LockwoodD. & PottiegerA. E. (1993). Women and Crack Cocaine. New York: Macmillan.
JoeK. (1994). Ice Is Strong Enough for a Man but Made for a Woman: A Social Cultural Analysis of Crystal Methamphetamine Use Among Asian Pacific Americans. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 22, 269–289.
12.
JoeK. (1996). The Life and Times of Asian Pacific American Women Drug Users: An Ethnographic Study of Their Methamphetamine Use. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(1), 199–218.
13.
JoeK. (1997). Going Home: The Double-Edged Sword. The Paradox of Family Among Women Drug Users in Hawai'i. Social Processes in Hawai'i, 38, 125–137.
14.
Joe-LaidlerK. & MorganP. (1997). Kinship and Community: The Ice Crisis in Hawaii. In KeeH. (Ed.), Amphetamine Misuse: An International Perspective (pp. 163–180). Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
15.
JohnsonB. D. (1985). Taking Care of Business: The Economics of Crime by Heroin Abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
16.
LindesmithA. R. (1947). Opiate Addiction. Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.
17.
MaherL. (1992). Punishment and Welfare: Crack Cocaine and the Regulation of Mothering. Women and Criminal Justice, 3(2), 35.
18.
MaherL. (1996). Hidden in the Light: Occupational Norms Among Crack-Using Street-Level Sex Workers. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(1), 143.
19.
MaherL.DunlapE.JohnsonB. D. & HamidA. (1996). Gender, Power, and Alternative Living Arrangements in the Inner-City Crack Culture. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(2), 181–205.
20.
MurphyS. & RosenbaumM. (1997). Two Women Who Used Cocaine Too Much: Class, Race, Gender, Crack, and Coke. In ReinarmanC. & LevineH. G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice (pp. 98–112). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
PollanM. (1995, February 19). How Marijuana Has Grown: Marijuana in the 90's—High Tech, High Crime, and High Stakes. The New York Times Magazine, 31–57.
22.
RaphaelR. (1985). Cash Crop: An American Dream. Mendocino, CA: Ridge Times Press.
23.
ReinarmanCWaldorfD.MurphyS. & LevineH. G. (1997). The Contingent Call of the Pipe: Bingeing and Addiction Among Heavy Cocaine Smokers. In ReinarmanC. & LevineH. G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice (pp. 77–97). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
RosenbaumM. (1981). Women on Heroin. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25.
SAMHSA. (1999). National Household Survey of Drug Abuse: Population Estimates 1998 [website]. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available: http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/NHSDA/Pe1998/TOC.htm [1999, December 9].
26.
StephensR. C. (1991). The Street Addict Role: A Theory of Heroin Addiction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
StraussA. & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
28.
StraussA. & CorbinJ. (1994). Ground Theory Methodology: An Overview. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
WaldorfD. (1973). Careers in Dope. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
WaldorfD.ReinarmanC. & MurphyS. (1991). Cocaine Changes: The Experience of Using and Quitting. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
WesnerB. (1997). The Legal Geography of Marijuana in Hawai'i: Power, Politics, and Pakalolo. Unpublished Master of Arts thesis, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Manoa, HI.
32.
WilliamsT. M. (1989). The Cocaine Kids: The Inside Story of a Teenage Drug Ring. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33.
WilliamsT. M. (1992). Crackhouse: Notes From the End of the Line. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34.
ZinbergN. E. (1984). Drug, Set, and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant Use. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
