AasK. F. (2006). “The body does not lie”: Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime, Media, Culture, 2, 143–158.
2.
AkrichM. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In BijkerW. E.LawJ. (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 205–224). MIT Press.
3.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
4.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
5.
BijkerW. E.HughesT. P.PinchT. (Eds.) (1987). The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press.
6.
BijkerW. E.LawJ. (Eds.) (1992). Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press.
7.
BravermanI. (2013). Passing the sniff test: Police dogs as surveillance technology. Buffalo Law Review, 61, 81–167.
8.
CampbellN. D. (2004). Technologies of suspicion: Coercion and compassion in post-disciplinary surveillance regimes. Surveillance and Society, 2, 78–92.
9.
CampbellN. D. (2005). Suspect technologies: Scrutinizing the intersection of science, technology, and policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30, 374–402.
10.
CampbellN. D. (2020). Naloxone and the politics of overdose. The MIT Press.
11.
DemantJ.Dilkes-FrayneE. (2015). Situational crime prevention in nightlife spaces: An ANT examination of PAD dogs and doorwork. In RobertD.DufresneM. (Eds.), Actor-network theory and crime studies. Explorations in science and technology (pp. 5–19). Routledge.
12.
FarrugiaA. (2020). The ontological politics of partying: Drug education, young men and drug consumption. In LeahyD.FitzpatrickK.WrightJ. (Eds.), Social theory and health education (pp. 33–43). Routledge.
13.
FarrugiaA.FraserS.DwyerR.FomiattiR.NealeJ.DietzeP.StrangJ. (2019). Take-home naloxone and the politics of care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 41, 427–443.
14.
FoxN. J.AllredP. (2017). Sociology and the new materialism. Sage.
15.
FraserS. (2020). Doing ontopolitically-oriented research: Synthesising concepts from the ontological turn for alcohol and other drug research and other social sciences. International Journal of Drug Policy, 82, 102610.
16.
FraserS.MooreD. (2011). Introduction: Constructing drugs and addiction. In FraserS.MooreD. (Eds.), The drug effect: Health, crime and society (pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press.
17.
FraserS.TreloarC.GendererS.RanceJ. (2017). “Affording” new approaches to couples who inject drugs: A new fitpack design for hepatitis C prevention. International Journal of Drug Policy, 50, 19–35.
18.
FraserS.ValentineK.EkendahlM. (2018). Drugs, brains and other subalterns: Public debate and the new materialist politics of addiction. Body & Society, 24, 58–86.
19.
GomartE. (2002). Methadone: Six effects in search of a substance. Social Studies of Science, 32, 93–135.
20.
GomartE.HennionA. (1999). A sociology of attachment: Music amateurs, drug users. The Sociological Review, 47, 220–247.
21.
HerschingerE. (2015). The drug dispositif: Ambivalent materiality and the addiction of the global drug prohibition regime. Security Dialogue, 46, 183–201.
22.
HughesT. P. (1986). The seamless web: Technology, science, etcetera, etcetera. Social Studies of Science, 16, 281–292.
23.
LatourB. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Harvard University Press.
24.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
25.
MalinsP. (2011). An ethico-aesthetics of heroin chic: Art, cliché and capitalism. In GuillaumeL.HughesJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 165–187). Edinburgh University Press.
26.
MalinsP.FitzgeraldJ. L.ThreadgoldT. (2006). Spatial “folds”: The entwining of bodies, risks and city spaces for women injecting drug users in Melbourne’s Central Business District. Gender, Place & Culture, 13, 509–527.
27.
MillerD. (Ed.) (1998). Material cultures: Why some things matter. Chicago University Press.
28.
MooreD. (2007). Criminal artefacts: Governing drugs and users. UBC Press.
29.
PaulB.EgbertS. (2016). Drug testing for evidence? A sociotechnical practice. In O’GormanA.PotterG. R.FountainJ. (Eds.), Evidence in European social drug research and drug policy (pp. 99–112). Pabst.
30.
PinchT. J.BijkerW. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14, 399–441.
31.
RaceK. (2017). Thinking with pleasure: Experimenting with drugs and drug research. International Journal of Drug Policy, 49, 144–149.
32.
SarmientoE.SeearK.FraserS. (2019). Enacting alcohol and other drug (testing)-related harms in an Australian drug court. Contemporary Drug Problems, 46, 282–303.
33.
van der PloegI. (2005). The machine-readable body: Essays on biometrics and the informatization of the body. Shaker.
34.
VitelloneN. (2016). Social science of the Syringe. Routledge.