Teen drivers’ exposure to crash risk depends on where and how much they drive. Of the few published studies examining driving patterns and crash exposure, none focused on teen drivers, the highest crash risk group of all ages. This study used activity space measures to analyze everyday driving activities, resultant crash exposure, and associated factors for teen drivers aged 16–17. Using driving-related GPS-trajectory data collected from 76 teens for one month, we used a network-based activity space measure to categorize teens into three groups. We estimated each teen’s crash exposure by analyzing their travel frequency on specific roads and crash density on those roads for the broader young population. Lastly, we applied a cumulative link mixed model to assess the influence of demographic, road, and urban-social environmental characteristics on crash exposure and their variations across three driving activity-based teen groups. Our findings revealed that the geographic extent of teens’ everyday driving, measured through their activity space, varied extensively, resulting in varying crash exposure levels among them. The results suggested that teens’ exposure to crashes was associated with both the extent of their driving activity space and the road and urban environments in which they drive. Teens, who mostly drove within smaller geographic spaces experienced greater crash exposure while driving on primary roads and in poor neighborhoods compared to those driving extensively but mostly on highways. These findings have implications for urban planning and policymaking, identifying urban environments, particularly those crash-prone for teen drivers, and informing strategies to mitigate crash risks.
AdanuEKJonesSAbhayL, et al. (2022) Examining the who, what, and how of risky driving related crashes in residential areas. Journal of Urban Mobility2: 100024.
2.
AlmasiSABehnoodHRArvinR (2021) Pedestrian crash exposure analysis using alternative geographically weighted regression models. Journal of Advanced Transportation2021: 1–13.
3.
BastaLARichmondTSWiebeDJ (2010) Neighborhoods, daily activities, and measuring health risks experienced in urban environments. Social Science & Medicine71(11): 1943–1950.
4.
BeckLFDellingerAMO’NeilME (2007) Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, United States: Using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. American Journal of Epidemiology166(2): 212–218.
5.
BraitmanKAKirleyBBMcCarttAT, et al. (2008) Crashes of novice teenage drivers: Characteristics and contributing factors. Journal of Safety Research39(1): 47–54.
6.
BrowningCRCalderCABoettnerB, et al. (2021) Neighborhoods, activity spaces, and the span of adolescent exposures. American Sociological Review86(2): 201–233.
ChenMChenPGaoX, et al. (2020) Examining injury severity in truck-involved collisions using a cumulative link mixed model. Journal of Transport & Health19: 100942.
CurrierLGlaeserELKreindlerGE (2023) Infrastructure inequality: Who pays the cost of road roughness? NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 31981, National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w31981 (accessed 11 November 2025).
11.
DongNMengFZhangJ, et al. (2020) Towards activity-based exposure measures in spatial analysis of pedestrian–motor vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention148: 105777.
12.
EliasWToledoTShiftanY (2010) The effect of daily-activity patterns on crash involvement. Accident Analysis & Prevention42(6): 1682–1688.
13.
EwingRHamidiSGraceJB (2016) Urban sprawl as a risk factor in motor vehicle crashes. Urban Studies53(2): 247–266.
14.
GelbJ (2021) SpNetwork: A package for network kernel density estimation. The R Journal13(2): 460.
15.
GolledgeRGStimsonRJ (1997) Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
16.
HakkertASBraimaisterLVan SchagenI (2002) The Uses of Exposure and Risk in Road Safety Studies. Leidschendam: SWOV Institute for Road Safety.
17.
HirschJAWintersMAsheMC, et al. (2016) Destinations that older adults experience within their GPS activity spaces: Relation to objectively measured physical activity. Environment and Behavior48(1): 55–77.
18.
HirschJAWintersMClarkeP, et al. (2014) Generating GPS activity spaces that shed light upon the mobility habits of older adults: A descriptive analysis. International Journal of Health Geographics13(1): 51.
19.
HooperEPetersSPintusPA (2018) The Causal Effect of Infrastructure Investments on Income Inequality: Evidence from US States. 2018. Available at: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01684565/document (accessed 11 November 2025).
20.
HossainMMRahmanMA (2023) Understanding the potential key risk factors associated with teen driver crashes in the United States: A literature review. Digital Transportation and Safety2(4): 268–277.
KestensYLebelADanielM, et al. (2010) Using experienced activity spaces to measure foodscape exposure. Health & Place16(6): 1094–1103.
23.
KwanM-P (2000) Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies8(1–6): 185–203.
24.
LeeCAbdel-AtyM (2005) Comprehensive analysis of vehicle–pedestrian crashes at intersections in Florida. Accident Analysis & Prevention37(4): 775–786.
LiDDealBZhouX, et al. (2018) Moving beyond the neighborhood: Daily exposure to nature and adolescents’ mood. Landscape and Urban Planning173: 33–43.
27.
LiXYuSHuangX, et al. (2022) Do underserved and socially vulnerable communities observe more crashes? A spatial examination of social vulnerability and crash risks in Texas. Accident Analysis & Prevention173: 106721.
28.
LinCWuDLiuH, et al. (2020) Factor Identification and prediction for teen driver crash severity using machine learning: A case study. Applied Sciences10(5): 1675.
29.
LouYZhangCZhengY, et al. (2009) Map-matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, Seattle Washington, 4 November 2009, pp. 352–361. ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1653771.1653820 (accessed 14 June 2024).
30.
MarshallWEFerenchakNN (2017) Assessing equity and urban/rural road safety disparities in the US. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability10(4): 422–441.
31.
McCrayTMMoraS (2011) Analyzing the activity spaces of low-income teenagers: How do they perceive the spaces where activities are carried out?Journal of Urban Affairs33(5): 511–528.
32.
MerlinLAGuerraEDumbaughE (2020) Crash risk, crash exposure, and the built environment: A conceptual review. Accident Analysis & Prevention134: 105244.
33.
MohanDBangdiwalaSIVillavecesA (2017) Urban street structure and traffic safety. Journal of Safety Research62: 63–71.
34.
OuimetMCPradhanAKBrooks-RussellA, et al. (2015) Young drivers and their passengers: A systematic review of epidemiological studies on crash risk. Journal of Adolescent Health57(1, Supplement): S24–S35.e6.
35.
ParthasarathiPHochmairHLevinsonD (2015) Street network structure and household activity spaces. Urban Studies52(6): 1090–1112.
36.
PattersonZFarberS (2015) Potential path areas and activity spaces in application: A review. Transport Reviews35(6): 679–700.
37.
Peek-AsaCBrittonCYoungT, et al. (2010) Teenage driver crash incidence and factors influencing crash injury by rurality. Journal of Safety Research41(6): 487–492.
38.
PerchouxCChaixBCumminsS, et al. (2013) Conceptualization and measurement of environmental exposure in epidemiology: Accounting for activity space related to daily mobility. Health & Place21: 86–93.
39.
PirdavaniADanielsSvan VlierdenK, et al. (2017) Socioeconomic and sociodemographic inequalities and their association with road traffic injuries. Journal of Transport & Health4: 152–161.
40.
RegevSRolisonJJMoutariS (2018) Crash risk by driver age, gender, and time of day using a new exposure methodology. Journal of Safety Research66: 131–140.
41.
RezapourMKsaibatiK (2021) Modeling crashes involving children, finite mixture cumulative link mixed model. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion28(4): 494–502.
42.
RolisonJJMoutariS (2018) Risk-exposure density and mileage bias in crash risk for older drivers. American Journal of Epidemiology187(1): 53–59.
43.
SchönfelderSAxhausenKW (2003) Activity spaces: measures of social exclusion?Transport Policy10(4): 273–286.
44.
ShermanJESpencerJPreisserJS, et al. (2005) A suite of methods for representing activity space in a healthcare accessibility study. International Journal of Health Geographics4(1): 24.
45.
ShopeJBinghamC (2008) Teen driving: motor-vehicle crashes and factors that contribute. American Journal of Preventive Medicine35(3): S261–S271.
46.
Sila-NowickaKFotheringhamASDemšarU (2023) Activity triangles: A new approach to measure activity spaces. Journal of Geographical Systems25(4): 489–517.
47.
StilesJKarALeeJ, et al. (2023) Lower volumes, higher speeds: Changes to crash type, timing, and severity on urban roads from COVID-19 stay-at-home policies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2677: 15–27.
48.
StilesJLiYMillerHJ (2022) How does street space influence crash frequency? An analysis using segmented street view imagery. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science49: 2467–2483.
VoasRBTippettsASRomanoE, et al. (2007) Alcohol involvement in fatal crashes under three crash exposure measures. Traffic Injury Prevention8(2): 107–114.
51.
WangDLiF (2016) Daily activity space and exposure: A comparative study of Hong Kong’s public and private housing residents’ segregation in daily life. Cities59: 148–155.
52.
WeiLKwanM-PVermeulenR, et al. (2023) Measuring environmental exposures in people’s activity space: The need to account for travel modes and exposure decay. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology33(6): 954–962.
53.
WieheSEHochSCLiuGC, et al. (2008) Adolescent travel patterns: Pilot data indicating distance from home varies by time of day and day of week. Journal of Adolescent Health42(4): 418–420.
54.
XieZYanJ (2008) Kernel Density Estimation of traffic accidents in a network space. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems32(5): 396–406.
55.
YangJPeek-AsaCZhangY, et al. (2024) ProjectDRIVE: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to improve driving practices of high-risk teen drivers with a traffic violation. Injury Epidemiology11(1): 12.
56.
YaoSLooBPYLamWWY (2015) Measures of activity-based pedestrian exposure to the risk of vehicle-pedestrian collisions: Space-time path vs. potential path tree methods. Accident Analysis & Prevention75: 320–332.
57.
YooDK (2023) Relationship between socioeconomic inequality and traffic crashes on virginia roads at the county and census-tract levels. VTRC 24-R12. Virginia Transportation Research Council. Available at: https://vtrc.virginia.gov/media/vtrc/vtrc-pdf/vtrc-pdf/24-R12.pdf (accessed 8 September 2024).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
