Media reporting of drug issues has important ramifications for public opinion of drugs and drug trends. This study was conducted to examine the media coverage of a specific new subcategory of drugs, so-called “designer drugs,” using coverage of a highly publicized attack in Miami as a case study. Broadcast news transcripts were analyzed to both identify themes in coverage of this attack and contextualize this reporting in the clinical literature on bath salts, the drug implicated in the attack. Textual analysis of broadcast coverage produced four major emergent themes: (1) vivid and sensational descriptions of the attack and of the effects of the drug, (2) discussion of bath salts use as an “epidemic,” (3) appeals to tighten legislation related to bath salts, and (4) silence on issues related to mental health. In addition, media reporting of this attack did not take into account potentially salient sources of information such as clinical research on rates of use and commonly reported behavioral effects of the drug to place bath salts use in context of this literature. Together, these findings suggest that media coverage of the Miami Zombie Attack framed a novel drug in incomplete and problematic terms. These framing choices dramatically underrepresented the role of mental health in the attack and led to inadequately informed health legislation.
ChiricosT. (1996). Moral panic as ideology: Drugs, violence, race and punishment in America. In LynchM.PattersonE. B. (Eds.), Justice with prejudice (pp. 19–47). Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.
15.
ChiricosT.EschholzS.GertzM. (1997). Crime, news and fear of crime: Toward an identification of audience effects. Social Problems, 44, 342–357.
16.
ChiricosT.PadgettK.GertzM. (2000). Fear, TV news, and the reality of crime. Criminology, 38, 755–785.
17.
ChitwoodD. D.MurphyS.RosenbaumM. (2009). Reflections on the meaning of drug epidemics. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 29–39.
CohenB. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
CohenS. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of mods and rockers. London, England: MacGibbon and Kee.
21.
CollinsJ. W. (2011). Sending a message: Ecstasy, equasy and the media politics of drug classification. Health, Risk & Society, 13, 221–237.
22.
CoyleM. (2003). Race and class penalties in crack cocaine sentencing. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
23.
DasguptaN.MandlK.BrownsteinJ. (2009). Breaking the news or fueling the epidemic? Temporal association between news media report volume and opioid-related mortality. PLoS One, 4, e7758.
24.
Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies.
25.
DeseranT. A.OrcuttJ. D. (2009). The deconstruction of a drug crisis: Media coverage of drug issues during the 1996 presidential campaign. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 871–891.
26.
DiMaggioA. (2009). When media goes to war. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
27.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51.
28.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analyzing discourse and text: Textual analysis for social research. London, England: Routledge.
29.
FraserS.MooreD. (2011a). Introduction. In FraserS.MooreD. (Eds.), The drug effect: Health, crime and society (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
FraserS.MooreD. (2011b). Governing through problems: The formulation of policy on amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) in Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 498–506.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In BraungartR. G.BraungartM. M. (Eds.), Research in political sociology (pp. 137–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
33.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
GlassnerB. (2004). Narrative techniques of fear mongering. Social Research, 71, 819–826.
35.
GolubA.JohnsonB. D.DunlapE. (2005). Subcultural evolution and illicit drug use. Addiction Research & Theory, 13, 217–229.
36.
GoodeE.Ben-YehudaN. (1994). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
37.
GuggenheimL.JangS. M.BaeS. Y.NeumanW. R. (2015). The dynamics of issue frame competition in traditional and social media. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 659, 207–224.
38.
HughesC.LancasterK.SpicerB. (2011). How do Australian news media depict illicit drug issues? An analysis of print media reporting across and between illicit drugs, 2003–2008. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 285–291.
39.
JhallyS. (Producer). (1997). Stuart hall: Representation & the media [Filmed lecture]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
40.
KeaneH. (2002). What’s wrong with addiction? Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2012). Synthetic drugs. Washington, DC: White House.
55.
OrcuttJ. D.TurnerJ. (1993). Shocking numbers and graphic accounts: Quantified images of drug problems in the print media. Social Problems, 40, 190–212.
56.
PartridgeB.BellS.LuckeJ.YeatesS.HallW. (2009). Smart drugs “as common as coffee”: Media hype about neuroenhancement. PLoS One, 6, e28416.
57.
ReinarmanC.LevineH. (Eds.). (1997). Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
58.
RoomR. (2004). Alcohol and drugs in a public health context. Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3, 137–144.
ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297–316.
61.
SchudsonM. (2003). The sociology of news. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
SpillerH.RyanM.WestonR.JansenJ. (2011). Clinical experience with an analytical confirmation of “bath salts” and “legal highs” (synthetic cathinones) in the United States. Clinical Toxicology, 49, 499–505.
64.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental health findings. NSDUH Series H-49, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4887. Rockville, MD: Author.
65.
SwartzM. S.SwansonJ. W.HidayV. A.BorumR.WagnerH. R.BurnsB. J. (1998). Violence and severe mental illness: The effects of substance abuse and nonadherence to medication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 226–231.
