The neighborhood of Vesterbro in Copenhagen has housed the largest open drug scene in Denmark since the 1980s. In recent years there has been a remarkable change in the police strategy towards this drug scene from zero tolerance to a non-enforcement strategy. This article presents a case study of this change in strategy and its implications for more general discussions about drug control and harm reduction. With inspiration from the governmentality literature, in particular how government involves the construction of governable spaces, and police research that emphasizes the territorial aspects of policing, the article seeks to characterize the difference between the two drug control strategies at Vesterbro. The analysis is based on original research and secondary literature. The article concludes that the non-enforcement strategy opens up the drug scene to new kinds of intervention by police and social welfare institutions, and that it changes the relationship between social welfare provision and policing.
AsmussenV. & JepsenJ.2007). Dansk narkoticka — Kontrolpolitik — Akuelt og historisk. In PedersonSejer J. (Ed.), Ret of Samfund 2007. Copenhagen: Frydenland.
2.
BantonM. (1964). The policeman in the community. London: Tavistock.
3.
BittnerE. (1967). The police on Skid-Row: A study of peace keeping. American Sociological Review, 32(5), 699–715.
4.
BlessR.KortD.J., & FreemanM. (1995). Open drug scenes: A cross-national comparison of concepts and strategies. European Addiction Research, 1, 128–138.
5.
BragaA. A., & BondB. J. (2008). Policing crime and disorder at hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 46(3), 577–607.
6.
Brockenhuus-SchackA. (1998). Det er sgu få sejre som narkomaner, Stof, 7. Retrieved April 21, 2014, from www.stofbladet.dk
7.
Copenhagen Police Department. (2012). Instruction, July 30th 2012.
8.
DahlH. (2008). Open drug scenes: Danish drug policy reflected through international drug prohibition and local interventions. In FrankV.A.HouborgE. & BjergeB. (Eds.), Drug policy. History, theory and consequences (pp. 91–121). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
9.
DeanM. (1999). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.
10.
DonzelotJ. (1997). The policing of families. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
FichC., & BrünésN. (2000). Sygepleje blandt stofmisbrugere. Erfaringer fra arbejdet som gadesygeplejersker på Maria Kirkeplads på Vesterbro i København 1998 og 1999 [Nursing among drug users: The experience of working as street nurses at St. Mary's Church Square in central Copenhagen 1998 and 1999]. Copenhagen: Family and Labour Market Administration.
12.
FoucaultM. (1991). Governmentality. In BurchellG.GordonC., & MillerP. (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13.
FrantzsenE. (2003). Drug enforcement in Copenhagen: Negotiating space. In PedersenE. H. & TigerstedtC. (Eds.), Regulating drugs — Between users, the police and social workers (pp. 75–84). Helsinki: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research (NAT).
14.
FrantzenE. (2005). Narkojakt på gateplan. Om politikontroll av narkotika på Vesterbro [Drug hunting at street level: About police enforcement of drugs in Vesterbro]. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
15.
GoldsteinP. J. (1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 143–174.
16.
GreeneJ. A. (1999). Zero tolerance: A case study of police policies and practices in New York City. Crime and Delinquency, 45(2), 171–187.
17.
HerbertS. (1997a). Policing space. Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
HerbertS. (1997b). Territoriality and the police. Professional Geographer, 49(1), 86–94.
19.
HerbertS., & BeckettK. (2009). Zoning out disorder: Assessing contemporary practices of urban social control. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 47, 1–25.
20.
Hoff-LundO.AndersenS., & OlsenM.L. (2012). Fixerummet der fik hjul [The injection room that got wheels]. Copenhagen: Forlagetpb43.
21.
HouborgE. (2010). Control and welfare in Danish drug policy. Journal of Drug Issues, 40(4), 783–804.
JepsenJ. (1966). Marihuana i kriminologisk og juridisk belysning. In ThygesenE. (Ed.), Er marihuana skadelig? (pp. 169–248). Copenhagen: Stig Vendelkærs Forlag.
24.
JepsenJ. (2008). Danish drug control policy 1945–2007. In FrankV.A.HouborgE. & BjergeB. (Eds.), Drug policy. History, theory and consequences (pp. 151–180). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
25.
JepsenJ., & LaursenL. (1998). Recent changes in Danish law on drugs and drug offences. European Addiction Research, 4(3), 113–127.
26.
Københavns Kommune. (2012, June 6). Partnerskabsaftale mellem Københavns Politi og Københavns Kommune vedrørende stofindtagelsesrum [Partnership agreement between the Copenhagen Police Department and the Municipality of Copenhagen]. Copenhagen: Københavns Kommune.
27.
Law no. 185. (2012, June 13). Retrieved April 21, 2014, from www.retsinfo.dk
28.
LivingstonD. (1997). Police discretion and the quality of life in public places: Courts, communities, and the new policing. Columbia Law Review, 97(3), 551–672.
29.
MillerP., & RoseN. (1993). Governing economic life. In GaneM. A. J. T. (Ed.), Foucault's New Domains. London: Routledge.
30.
Ministry of Health. (2012, June 13). Notes for Law no. 185 of June 13th 2012. Retrieved April 21, 2014, from www.retsinfo.dk
31.
MøllerK. (2011). Kontrolregimer og narkotikapolitik: Hvordan balanceres borgernes velbefindende og selvbestemmelse? [Control regimes and drug policy: How balanced being and self-determination?] In FrankV.A. & DahlH.V. (Eds.), Kriminalitet og illegale stoffer [Crime and illegal drugs] (pp. 145–168). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
32.
NeocleousM. (2003). Off the map. On violence and cartography. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), 409–425.
OsborneT., & RoseN. (1999). Governing cities: Notes on the spatialisation of virtue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 737–760.
35.
OsborneT., & RoseN. (2004). Spatial phenomenotechnics: Making space with Charles Booth and Patrick Gedders. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 209–228.
36.
ReinerR. (1985). The Politics of the police. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
37.
Rigsadvokaten. (2006). Meddelelse nr.6/2006, Sanktionspåstande mv. i narkotikasager [Announcement No. 6/2006, Sanctions Allegations etc. In drug cases, J.no. RA-2012-801-0071].
38.
RoseN. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
RoseN. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SackR. D. (1983). Human territoriality: A theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(1), 55–74.
42.
ShermanL. W., & WeisburdD. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648.
43.
SpannowK. E., & AsmussenV. (2001). På gaden og henne om hjørnet. Foranstaltninger i relation til forekomst og brug af illegale stoffer i tre danske byer [On the street and around the corner: Measures related to the presence and use of illegal drugs in three Danish cities]. Aarhus, Denmark: Center for Alcohol and Drug Research, University of Aarhus.
44.
StorgaardL. L. (2000). Konstruktionen af dansk narkotikakontrolpolitik siden 1965 [The construction of the Danish drug policy since 1965]. Copenhagen: Lawyers and Economists Association.
45.
WattsM. (2003). Development and govenmentality. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24(1), 6–34.
46.
WeisburdD., & EckJ. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 42–65.
47.
WilsonJ. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge, Massachusettes: Harvard University Press.
48.
WoodJ. D.SorgE. T.GroffE. R.RatcliffeJ. H., & TaylorC. J. (2013). Cops as treatment providers: Realities and ironies of police work in a foot patrol experiment. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy. 1–18. doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.784292
49.
WoodJ. D.TaylorC. J.GroffE. R., & RatcliffeJ. H. (2013). Aligning policing and public health promotion: Insights from the world of foot patrol. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 1–13. doi:10.1080/15614263.2013.846982
50.
WältiS., & KüblerD. (2003). “New governance” and associative pluralism: The case drug policy in Swiss cities. The Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 499–525.
