Contemporary research often relates driving under the influence (DUI) to alcohol addiction and young drunk drivers, in particular, to social deviance. Based on qualitative interviews with 25 convicted drunk drivers, this article studies the relationship between drinking and DUI. The article focuses on three different categories of drunk drivers. In the first, drunk drivers consider addiction to be the main cause of DUI. In the second, they position themselves within subcultural groups often engaged in using illicit drugs, alcohol, and DUI. Both of these categories agree with conceptions of DUI as resulting from alcoholism or social deviance. However, the interviews also revealed a third type of relationship between drinking and DUI. Interviewees in this third category rejected the other two relationships by dissociating themselves from alcoholism and social deviance. Instead, they described themselves and their relationship between drinking and DUI as normal. The article thus concludes that while some drunk drivers view themselves in line with popular conceptions of DUI, others distance themselves from these associations so as to present themselves as normal.
AlasuutariP. (1986). Alcoholism in its cultural context: The case of blue-collar men. Contemporary Drug Problems, 13(4), 641–685.
2.
Alcoholics Anonymous. (2001). Alcoholics Anonymous. New York City: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.
3.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BernhoftI.M.HelsT.RendsvigT.L., & Orozova-BekkevoldI. (2007). Karakteristik af spiritusbilisten [Characteristic of the drunken driver]. (Report No. 1). Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
5.
BishopN. (2011). Predicting multiple DUI offenders using the Florida DRI. Substance Use & Misuse, 46(5), 696–703.
6.
BlumeL. (2002). Stigma and Social Control. (Report No. 119). Vienna, Austria: The Institute for Advanced Studies.
7.
CahalanD., & RoomR. (1972). Problem drinking among American men aged 21–59. American Journal of Public Health, 62(11), 1473–1482.
8.
CarlsonR.G.SextonR.HammarL., & ReeseT.H. (2011). Driving themselves to drink: Qualitative perspectives from “hardcore” DUI repeat offenders in Ohio. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 10(4), 363–379.
9.
CarstensenG. (1978). Research on drunken driving in Scandinavia. In CarstensenG.TakalaH.HaugeR., & VanhuferH. (Eds.), Scandinavian studies in criminology: Drinking-and-driving in Scandinavia (pp. 121–124). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
10.
ChristensenP.F. (2001). Sociale karakteristika hos trafikofre [Social characteristics of road victims]. (Report No. 1). Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
11.
Danish National Police. (2012). Bekendtgørelse om undervisningsplan for kursus i alkohol og trafik (A/T-kursus) [Executive order for the curriculum of alcohol and traffic safety courses]. Executive order no. 520.
12.
FlickU.von KardoffE., & SteinkeI. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage.
13.
Furr-HoldenC.D.VoasR.B.LaceyJ.RomanoE., & JonesK. (2011). The prevalence of alcohol use disorders among night-time weekend drivers. Addiction, 106, 1251–1260.
14.
FynboL., & JärvinenM. (2011). “The best drivers in the world”: Drink-driving and risk assessment. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 773–788.
15.
GoodmanA. (1990). Addiction: Definition and implications (Commentary). British Journal of Addiction, 85(11), 1403–1408.
16.
GusfieldJ.R. (1981). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
17.
GusfieldJ.R.RasmussenP., & KotarbaJ.A. (1984). The social control of drinking-driving: An ethnographic study of bar settings. Law & Policy, 6(1), 45–66.
18.
HingsonR., & WinterM. (2003). Epidemiology and consequences of drinking and driving. Alcohol Research & Health, 27(1), 63–78.
19.
HolderH. (1998). Alcohol and the community: A systems approach to prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
JellinekE.M. (1960). The disease concept of alcoholism. New Haven, CT: Hillhouse Press.
21.
JensenA.K.FrydkjærT., & FiskerL. (2011). Trafiksikkerhed ifølge danskerne [Traffic safety according to the Danes]. (Report). Copenhagen: Mandagmorgen.
22.
JärvinenM., & FynboL. (2011). Self-governance, control and loss of control amongst drunk drivers. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(6), 437–444.
23.
KingN., & HorrocksC. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage.
24.
LernerB.H. (2011). One for the road: Drunk driving since 1900. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
LevineH. (1978). The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 39(1), 143–174.
26.
LindesmithA.R. (1940). The drug addict as a psychopath. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 914–920.
27.
LindesmithA., & LevinY. (1937). The Lombrosian Myth in Criminology. American Journal of Sociology, 42(5), 653–671.
28.
LuptonD. (2002). Road rage: Drivers' understandings and experiences. Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 275–290.
29.
MaxwellM.A. (1951). Interpersonal forces in the genesis and treatment of alcohol addiction. Social Forces, 29(4), 443–448.
30.
MeyerR.E. (1996). The disease called addiction: Emerging evidence in a 200-year debate. The Lancet, 347(8995), 162–166.
31.
MooreD. (1992). Deconstructing “dependence”: An ethnographic critique of an influential concept. Contemporary Drug Problems, 19(3), 459–490.
32.
PeeleS. (1985). The meaning of addiction: An unconventional view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
RobertsonR.D.HolmesE., & MarcouxK. (2013). Female Drunk Drivers: A Qualitative Study—History and Experiences in the System. (Report). Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.
34.
RomanoE.O.PeckR.C., & VoasR.B. (2012). An evaluation of the narrowing gender gap in DUI arrests. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(4), 1414–1420.
35.
RoomR. (1997). Alcohol, the individual and society: What history teaches us. Addiction, 92(Suppl.1), 1–11.
36.
RoomR. (2005). Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(2), 143–155.
37.
RosenthalG. (2003). The healing effects of storytelling: On the conditions of curative storytelling in the context of research and counseling. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(6), 915–933.
38.
RossH.L. (1982). Deterring the drinking driver: Legal policy and social control. Lexington, MI: Lexington Books.
39.
RushB. (1823). Inquiry into the effects of ardent spirits upon the human body and mind: With an account of the means of preventing, and of the remedies for curing them. Boston: James Loring.
40.
SchwartzR.D., & SkolnickJ.H. (1962). Two studies of legal stigma. In BeckerH. (Ed.), Perspectives on deviance: The other side (pp. 103–117). New York: Free Press
SmithD.E. (2012). The process addictions and the new ASAM definition of addiction (Editor's Note). Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 44(1), 1–4.
43.
SussmanS., & SussmanA.N. (2011). Considering the definition of addiction (Editorial). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(10), 4025–4038.
44.
SykesW.GroomC.KellyJ., & HopkinJ. (2010). A Qualitative Study of Drinking and Driving: Report of Findings. (Road Safety Research Report No. 114). London: Department of Transport.
45.
TimkoC.DesaiA.BlonigenD.M.MoosB.S., & MoosR.H. (2011). Driving while intoxicated among individuals initially untreated for alcohol use disorders: One- and sixteen-year follow-ups. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(2), 173–184.
46.
ValverdeM., & White-MairK. (1999). “One day at a time” and other slogans for everyday life: The ethical practices of Alcoholics Anonymous. Sociology, 33(2), 393–410.
47.
WeinbergD. (1997). Lindesmith on addiction: A critical history of a classic theory. Sociological Theory, 15(2), 150–161.
48.
WeinbergD. (1998). Praxis and addiction: A reply to Galliher. Sociological Theory, 16(2), 207–208.
49.
WeinbergD. (2002). On the embodiment of addiction. Body & Society, 8(4), 1–19.
50.
WeinbergD. (2012). The social construction of self knowledge: A commentary on the legacy of Melvin Pollner. American Sociologist, 43, 76–84.
51.
WHO. (1957). Expert Committee on Addiction-Producing Drugs: Seventh Report. (Technical Report No. 116). Geneva: The World Health Organization, Palais des Nations.
52.
YoungJ. (1971). The role of the police as amplifiers of deviancy, negotiators of reality and translators of fantasy: Some consequences of our present system of drug control as seen in Notting Hill. In CohenS. (Ed.), Images of deviance (pp. 27–61). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
