Most studies of relapse and recovery among women drug users with children focus on improving their access to drug treatment. This article explores disengagement from a sociological perspective, as a process of personal and social identity transition. Drawing on an ethnographic study of young mothers and pregnant women attempting to disengage from injecting drug use, I suggest that this process is further compounded by a number of factors. Many women find it difficult to establish ties to the non-drug-using world, in part due to social isolation and in part due to ongoing stigmatization. Despite wanting to do what is best for their children, many are also ambivalent about giving up drug-using activities and relationships that remain integral to their identities. I argue that these are significant, complicating factors in the process of disengagement for women with children, which have implications for the kind of services and programs available to them.
AndersonT., & MottJ.A. (1998). Drug-related identity change: Theoretical development and empirical assessment. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(2), 299–327.
2.
AppellA. (1998). On fixing “bad” mothers and saving their children. In Ladd-TaylorM. & UmanskyL. (Eds.), “Bad” mothers: The politics of blame in twentieth-century America, pp. 356–380. New York: New York University Press.
3.
AstonS. (2009). Identities under construction: Women hailed as addicts. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness & Medicine, 13(6), 611–628.
4.
BakerP. L. (2000). “I didn't know”: Discoveries and identity transformation of women addicts in treatment, Journal of Drug Issues, 30(4), 863–880.
5.
BakerP.L., & CarsonA. (1999). “I take care of my kids”: Mothering practices of substance abusing women. Gender & Society, 13, 347–363.
6.
BiernackiP. (1986). Pathways from heroin addiction: Recovery without treatment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1999). The space of points of view (FergusonP., Trans.). In BourdieuP. (Ed.), The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society, pp. 3–5. Oxford: Polity Press.
8.
BoydS. C. (1999). Mothers and illicit drugs: Transcending the myths. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
9.
BrisonS. (1997). Outliving oneself: Trauma, memory and personal identity. In MeyersD. T. (Ed.), Feminists rethink the self, pp. 12–39. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.
10.
ClausR.E.OrwinR.G.KissinW.KrupskiA.CampbellK., & StartK. (2007). Does gender-specific substance abuse treatment for women promote continuity of care?Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(1), 27–39.
11.
ComfortM., & KaltenbachK. (2000). Predictors of treatment outcomes for substance-abusing women: A retrospective study. Substance Abuse, 21(1), 33–45.
12.
CopelandJ. (1998). A qualitative study of self-managed change in substance dependence among women. Contemporary Drug Problems, 25(2), 321–345.
13.
DaleyM.ArgeriouM., & McCarthyD. (1998). Substance use treatment for pregnant women: A window of opportunity?Addictive Behaviors, 23(2), 239–249.
14.
EpeleM. E. (2001). Excess, scarcity and desire among drug-using sex workers. Body & Society, 7(2–3), 161–179.
15.
EtheringtonK. (2006). Understanding drug misuse and changing identities: A life story approach. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 13(3), 233–245.
16.
EttorreE. (1992). Women and substance use. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan.
17.
EttorreE. (2007) Revisioning women and drug use: Gender, power and the body. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave.
18.
FarleyM.GoldingJ.M.YoungG.MulliganM., & MinkoffJ.R. (2004). Trauma history and relapse probability among patients seeking substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 161–167.
19.
FinkelsteinN. (1994). Treatment issues for alcohol and drug-dependent pregnant and parenting women. Health & Social Work, 19(1), 7–26.
20.
FitzgeraldJ.LouieR.RosenthalD., & CroftsN. (1999). The meaning of the rush for initiates to injecting drug use. Contemporary Drug Problems, 26(3), 481–504.
21.
FoucaultM. (1983). Afterword: The subject and power. In DreyfusH. L. & RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault, beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, pp. 208–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GibsonB.AcquahS., & RobinsonP.G. (2004). Entangled identities and psychotropic substance use. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(5), 597–616.
23.
GomartE. (2004). Surprised by methadone: In praise of drug substitution treatment in a French clinic. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 85–110.
24.
GreenfieldS.F.BrooksA.J., & GordonS.M. (2007). Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86(1), 1–21.
25.
GrellaC.ScottC.K.FlossM.A., & DennisM.L. (2008). Gender similarities and differences in the treatment, relapse, and recovery cycle. Evaluation Review, 32(1), 113–137.
26.
GubriumJ., & HolsteinJ. A. (2000). Analyzing interpretive practice. In DenzinN. K. and LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.), pp. 487–508. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
27.
HoltM., & TreloarC. (2008). Pleasure and drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 349–352.
28.
HowellE. M.HeiserN., & HarringtonM. (1999). A review of recent findings on substance abuse treatment for pregnant women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16(3), 195–219.
29.
HughesK. (2007). Migrating identities: The relational constitution of drug use and addiction. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(5), 673–691.
30.
JessupM.HumphriesJ.BrindsC., & LeeK. (2003). Extrinsic barriers to substance abuse treatment among pregnant drug dependent women. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(2), 285–304.
31.
JosP. H.PerlmutterM., & MarshallM. F. (2003). Substance abuse during pregnancy: Clinical and public health approaches. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31, 340–350.
32.
KeaneH. (2000). Women and substance use: Problems of visibility and empowerment. In UssherJ. (Ed.), Women's health: Contemporary international perspectives, pp. 76–82. Leister, UK: British Psychological Society.
33.
KeaneH. (2005). Addiction and the bioethics of difference. In ShildrickM. & MykitiukR. (Eds.), Ethics of the body: Postconventional challenges, pp. 91–112. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
KearneyM. (1996). Reclaiming normal life: Mothers' stages of recovery from drug use. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecological & Neonatal Nursing, 25(9), 761–768.
35.
KeenanE.DormanA., & O'ConnorJ. (1993). Six year follow up of forty-five pregnant opiate addicts. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 162(7), 252–255.
36.
KleeH. (1998). Drug-using parents: Analyzing the stereotypes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 9, 437–448.
37.
KleeH. (2002a). Drugs and pregnancy. In KleeH.JacksonM., & LewisS. (Eds.), Drug misuse and motherhood, pp. 78–92. London: Routledge.
38.
KleeH. (2002b). Overcoming the barriers. In KleeH.JacksonM., & LewisS. (Eds.), Drug misuse and motherhood, pp. 263–276. London: Routledge.
39.
KleeH. (2002c). Relapse: Missing the window of opportunity. In KleeH.JacksonM., & LewisS. (Eds.), Drug misuse and motherhood, pp. 165–176. London: Routledge.
40.
LafaveL.DesportesL., & McBrideC. (2009). Treatment outcomes and perceived benefits: A qualitative and quantitative assessment of a women's substance abuse treatment program. Women & Therapy, 32(1), 51–68.
41.
AwJ. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
42.
LeslieM. (2007). Engaging pregnant women and mothers in services: A relational approach. In PooleN. & GreavesL. (Eds.), Highs and lows: Canadian perspectives on women and substance use, pp. 239–246. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.
43.
Lia-HoagbergB.RodeP.SkovholtP.ObergC.BergC.MullettS. (1990). Barriers and motivators to prenatal care among low-income women. Social Science & Medicine, 30(4), 487–495.
44.
MacLeanS. (2008). Volatile bodies: Stories of corporeal pleasure and damage in marginalized young people's drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 375–383.
45.
MartinF. (2010). Becoming vulnerable: Young women's accounts of initiation to injecting drug use. Addiction Research and Theory, 18(5), 511–527.
46.
McDonaldK. (1999). Struggles for subjectivity: Identity, action, and youth experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
McIntoshJ., & McKeganeyN. (2000a). Addicts' narratives of recovery from drug use: Constructing a non-addict identity. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1501–1510.
48.
McIntoshJ., & McKeganeyN. (2000b). The recovery from dependent drug use: Addicts' strategies for reducing the risk of relapse. Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 7(2), 179–192.
49.
McIntoshJ., & McKeganeyN. (2001). Identity and recovery from dependent drug use: The addict's perspective. Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 8(1), 47–59.
50.
McMahonT.WinkleJ.SuchmanN., & LutharS. (2002). Drug dependence, parenting responsibilities, and treatment history: Why doesn't mom go for help?Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 65(2), 105–114.
51.
MillerW. R., & RollnickS. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
52.
MuliaN. (2002). Ironies in the pursuit of well-being: The perspectives of low-income, substance-using women on service institutions. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29(4), 711–751.
53.
MurphyS., & RosenbaumM. (1999). Pregnant women on drugs: Combatting stigma and stereotypes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
54.
NajavitsL.M.RosierM.NolanA.L., & FreemanM.C. (2007). A new gender-based model for women's recovery from substance abuse: Results of a pilot outcome study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33(1), 5–11.
55.
NivN., & HserY. I. (2007). Women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs: Service needs, utilization and outcomes. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 87(2–3), 194–201.
56.
PaltrowL. (1999). Punishment and prejudice: Judging drug-using pregnant women. In HanigsbergJ. E. & RuddickS. (Eds.), Mother troubles: Rethinking contemporary maternal dilemmas, pp. 59–80. Boston: Beacon Press.
57.
PatesR.McBrideA., & ArnoldK. (2005). Needle fixation. In PatesR.McBrideA., & ArnoldK. (Eds.), Injecting illicit drugs, pp. 47–58. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
58.
PerryL. (1979). Women and drug use: An unfeminine dependency. London: Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence.
59.
PlumridgeE., & ChetwyndJ. (1999). Identity and the social construction of risk: Injecting drug use. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(3), 329–343.
60.
PowisB.GossopM.BuryC.PayneK., & GriffithsP. (2000). Drug using mothers: Social, psychological and substance use problems of women opiate users with children, Drug & Alcohol Review, 19, 171–180.
61.
RadcliffeP. (2009). Drug use and motherhood: Strategies for managing identity. Drug & Alcohol Today, 9(3), 17–21.
62.
RadcliffeP., & StevensA. (2008). Are drug treatment services only for “thieving junkie scumbags”? Drug users and the management of stigmatised identities. Social Science & Medicine, 67(7), 1065–1073.
63.
RhodesT., & QuirkA. (1998). Drug user's sexual relationships and the social organization of risk. Social Science & Medicine, 46(2), 157–169.
64.
RichterK.P., & BammerG. (2000). A hierarchy of strategies heroin-using mothers employ to reduce harm to their children. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19(4), 403–413.
65.
RivauxS.L.SohnS.ArmourM.P., & BellH. (2008). Women's early recovery. Journal of Drug Issues, 38(4), 957–980.
66.
RødnerS. (2005). “I am not a drug abuser, I am a drug user”: A discourse analysis of 44 drug users' constructions of identity. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(4), 333–346.
67.
RosenbaumM. (1981). Women on heroin. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
68.
RosenbaumM., & IrwinK. (Eds.) (2000). Pregnancy, drugs and harm reduction. In Harm reduction: National and international perspectives, pp. 89–109. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
SimpsonM., & McNultyJ. (2008). Different needs: Women's drug use and treatment in the UK. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(2),169–175.
70.
SingerM. (1998). Studying hidden populations. In SchensulJ.LeCompteM.TrotterR.CromelyE., & SingerM. (Eds.). Mapping social networks, spatial data and hidden populations, pp. 125–192. Thousand Oaks, CA: AltaMira Press.
71.
SterkC. (1999). Fast lives: Women who use crack-cocaine. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
72.
StewartD.GossopM.MarsdenJ.KiddT., & TreacyS. (2003). Similarities in outcomes for men and women after drug misuse treatment: Results from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). Drug & Alcohol Review, 22, 35–41.
73.
SunA. (2007). Relapse among substance-abusing women: Components and processes. Substance Use & Misuse, 42(1), 1–21.
74.
SwordW. (1999). A socio-ecological approach to understanding the barriers to prenatal care for women of low income. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(5), 1170–1177.
75.
SwordW.JackS.NiccolsA.MilliganK.HendersonJ., & ThabaneL. (2009). Integrated programs for women with substance use issues and their children: A qualitative meta-synthesis of processes and outcomes. Harm Reduction Journal, 6, article # 32.
76.
TaylorA. (1993). Women drug users: An ethnography of a female injecting community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
77.
TobinM.C. (2005). Lost opportunity or lifeline? Women with substance use issues and their perceptions of barriers to pregnancy care. Melbourne: Women's Alcohol and Drug Service, The Royal Women's Hospital.
78.
ToscanoV. (2005). Misguided retribution: Criminalization of pregnant women who take drugs. Social & Legal Studies, 14(3), 359–386
79.
TrjilloJ. (2004). An existential-phenomenology of crack cocaine abuse. Janus Head, 7(1), 167–187.
80.
VanDeMarkN.R. (2007). Policy on reintegration of women with histories of substance abuse: A mixed methods study of predictors of relapse and facilitators of recovery. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy, 2(28), 28–39.
81.
VitelloneN. (2003). The syringe as a prosthetic. Body & Society, 9(3), 37–52.
82.
WaldorfD. (1983). Natural recovery from opiate addiction. Journal of Drug Issues, 13, 237–280.
83.
WarrD.J. (2005). Social networks in a discredited neighbourhood. Journal of Sociology, 41(3), 285–308.
84.
WestR. (2006). Theory of Addiction. Oxford: Blackwell.
85.
WinickC. (1962). Maturing out of narcotic addiction. Bulletin on Narcotics, 14, 1–7.
86.
WrightS. (2002). Women's use of drugs: Gender specific factors. In KleeH.JacksonM., & LewisS. (Eds.), Drug misuse and motherhood, pp. 15–31. London: Routledge.
87.
YoungI. (1994). Punishment, treatment, empowerment: Three approaches to policy for pregnant addicts. Feminist Studies, 20(1), 33–57.
