The objectives of our study were to learn whether malt liquor is a problem for cities, how many cities have passed policies to restrict sales, what factors distinguish cities with policies from cities without policies, and whether policies are perceived to be effective. One alcohol policy official and one enforcement officer from each of the 115 largest American cities were solicited to participate in a telephone survey. Most respondents (65%) said malt liquor was a serious problem. Thirty cities adopted policies to restrict malt liquor sales. The odds of having a policy were higher if city leaders placed greater priority on addressing malt liquor-related problems (OR = 2.6) or had greater local authority over alcohol control (OR = 3.5). Respondents (54%) said the policies were effective in reducing malt liquor sales. Policies to restrict malt liquor sales offer a promising strategy to reduce problems associated with street drinking.
Adams Beverage Group. (2000). The Adams beer handbook. Norwalk, CT: The Beverage Information Group.
4.
Allen-TaylorJ. D. (1997, October 28). Malt assault. Sonoma County Independent Newspaper.
5.
American Medical Association (2004). Alcohol industry 101: Its structure and organization. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.AlcoholPolicyMD.com
6.
AsheM.JerniganD.KlineR., & GalazR. (2003). Land use planning and the control of alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and fast food restaurants. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1404–1408.
BluthenthalR. N.Brown-TaylorD.Guzman-BecerraN., & RobinsonP. L. (2005). Characteristics of malt liquor beer drinkers in a low-income, racial minority community sample. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(3), 402–409.
9.
ChenM.J.PaschallM.J., & GrubeJ.W. (2006). Motives for malt liquor consumption in a sample of community college students. Addictive Behaviors, 12(2), 1295–1307.
10.
ChikritzhsT.StockwellT., & PascalR. (2005). The impact of the Northern Territory's Living With Alcohol Program, 1992–2002: Revisiting the evaluation. Addiction, 100(11), 1625–1636.
11.
CohenD.MasonK., & ScribnerR. (2001). The population consumption model, alcohol control practices, and alcohol-related traffic fatalities. Prevention Medicine, 34, 187–197.
12.
CollinsR. L.BradizzaC. M., & VincentP. C. (2007). Young-adult malt liquor drinkers: Prediction of alcohol problems and marijuana use. Addictive Behaviors, 21(2), 138–146.
FrenchM.Brown-TaylorD., & BluthenthalR. (2006). Price elasticity of demand for malt liquor beer: Findings from a U.S. pilot study. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2101–2111.
15.
GreenfieldT.K.BondJ.KerrW.C.KorchaR., & Brown-TaylorD. (2004). Epidemiology of malt liquor beer consumption based on the year 2000 National Alcohol Survey. Paper presented at the 2004 American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
16.
HerdD. (2005). Changes in the prevalence of alcohol use in rap song lyrics, 1979–97. Addiction, 100(9), 1258–1269.
17.
HolderH., & ReynoldsR. (1997). Application of local policy to prevent alcohol problems: Experiences form a community trial. Addiction, 92 (Suppl. 2), 285–292.
18.
Jones-WebbR. J.McKeeP.HannanP.WallM.PhamL., & EricksonD. (2008). Alcohol and malt liquor availability and promotion and homicide in inner cities. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 159–177.
19.
Jones-WebbR.WagenaarA. C., & FinneganJ. (1997). Designing a survey of public opinions regarding alcohol control policies among African American and White adults. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 8(1), 18–24.
20.
LoganB.K.CaseG.A., & DistefanoS. (1999). Alcohol content of beer and malt beverages: Forensic considerations. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44(6), 1292–1295.
21.
Miller Brewing Company (2001). Behavioral Tracking Study 2000. Milwaukee, WI: Author.
MooreH.Jones-WebbR.ToomeyT., & LenkK. (2008). Alcohol advertising on billboards, transit shelters, and bus benches in inner-city neighborhoods. Contemporary Drug Problems, 35(2/3), 509–532.
24.
MosherJ. F., & JerniganD. H. (1989). New directions in alcohol policy. Annual Review of Public Health, 10, 245–279.
25.
RoyerH. (2004). One year evaluation of the Pioneer Square alcohol impact area (AIA). City of Seattle: Department of Neighborhoods.
SampsonR., & ScottM. (2000). Tracking crime and other public safety problems: Case studies in problem solving. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice-Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
28.
TarnaiJ. (2003). Evaluation of the Tacoma, Washington, Alcohol Impact Area (AIA). Tacoma: Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University.
29.
TarnaiJ. (2009). Post-assessment Seattle: Washington Alcohol Impact Areas. Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University. (No. Data Report 09–032).
30.
ToomeyT.L., & WagenaarA. (2000). Possibilities of alcohol-related prevention policy in the USA. In SchmidtB. & HurrelmannK. (Eds.), Prevention drug policy: A handbook. Oplanden, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
31.
ToomeyT.L., & WagenaarA. (2002). Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: Options and research findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14, 193–205.
32.
U.S. Census. (2007, December). Annual estimates of the population for incorporated places over 100,000, ranked by July 1, 2006 population: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2006. Retrieved February 2, 2008, from http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/SUB-EST2006.html
VilamovskaA. M.Brown-TaylorD., & BluthenthalR. N. (2009). Adverse drinking-related consequences among lower income, racial, and ethnic minority drinkers: Cross-sectional results. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(4), 645–653.
36.
WagenaarA.SaloisM., & KomroK. (2009). Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: A meta-analysis of estimates from 112 studies. Addiction, 104, 179–190.
