Alcohol policies encounter major problems because of the lack of consensus within and between jurisdictions. Tools that economists have developed in other contexts may be of use in addressing these problems.
The consensus between neighboring jurisdictions can be facilitated when a jurisdiction with higher alcohol taxes and greater alcohol revenue offers to share part of that revenue with the neighbor with lower alcohol revenue and alcohol taxes. The final solution can result in both jurisdictions having larger revenues and in reduced alcohol consumption.
Decreasing support for alcohol curbing policies within some jurisdictions could probably be reversed if such tools as revenue neutrality of alcohol taxes, heavier taxation of heavy drinkers, introduction of minimum prices and substitution of low-quality drinks with high-quality food and drinks were to be employed, and if greater attention were given to the determinants of alcohol needs and, in particular, of “happiness.”
AndersonP., & BaumbergB. (2006) Alcohol in Europe: A public health perspective. London, England: Institute of Alcohol Studies.
2.
AndréassonS.HolderH. D.NorströmH. D.ÖsterbergE. & RossowI. (2006) Estimates of harm associated with changes in Swedish alcohol policy: Possible reasons for divergencies between estimated and observed harm levels. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
3.
AndrienkoY. & NemtsovA. (2005) Economics Education and Research Consortium Working Paper, series N.05/10.
4.
AsbridgeM. & WeersingheS. (2006) Alcohol-related homicide in Chicago from 1870 to 1930: Exploring the alcohol-violence nexus in the era of Prohibition. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
5.
BaborT.CaetanoR.CasswellS.EdwardsG.GiesbrechtN.GrahamK. (2003) Alcohol: No ordinary commodity: Research and public policy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
BaltagiB. H. & GoelR. (1990) Quasi-experimental price elasticity of liquor demand in the United States: 1960–1983. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 451–454.
7.
BaltagiB. H. & GriffinJ. M. (1995) A dynamic demand model for liquor: The case for pooling. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 545–553.
8.
BaltagiB. H. & GriffinJ. M. (2002) Rational addiction to alcohol: Panel data analysis of liquor consumption, Health Economics, 11, 485–491.
9.
BeardT. R.GantP. A. & SabaR. P. (1997) Border-crossing sales, tax avoidance, and state tax policies: An application to alcohol. Southern Economic Journal, 64, 293–306.
10.
BjörnssonH. (2006) Proposed alterations to alcohol policies in the Republic of Iceland: Theoretical implications of lowering the legal drinking age and partially privatizing alcohol sales. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
11.
BlakeD. & NiedA. (1997) The demand for alcohol in the United Kingdom. Applied Economics, 29, 1655–1672.
12.
BlaylockJ. R. & BlisardW. N. (1993) Women and the demand of alcohol: Estimating participation and consumption. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 27, 319–334.
13.
BlundellR.PashardesP. & WeberG. (1993) What do we learn bout consumer demand patterns from micro data?American Economic Review, 83, 570–597.
14.
CarboneA. (2002) The role of the denomination of origin in Italian agriculture. Working Paper 29/02. Rome, Italy: INEA.
15.
ChaloupkaF. J.GrossmanM. & SafferH. (2002) The effects of price on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Research & Health, 26(1), 22–34.
16.
ChaloupkaF. J.SafferH. & GrossmanM. (1993) Alcohol-control policies and motor-vehicle fatalities. Journal of Legal Studies, 22(1), 161–186.
17.
CrawfordI.SmithZ. & TannerS. (1999) Alcohol taxes, tax revenue and the single European market. Fiscal Studies, 20, 287–304.
18.
CrawfordI. & TannerS. (1995) Bringing it all back home: Alcohol taxation and cross-border shopping. Fiscal Studies, 16, 94–114.
19.
Di TellaR. & MacCullochR. (2006) Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 25–46.
20.
EdwardsG.AndersonP.BaborT. F.CasswellS.FerrenceR.GiesbrechtN. (1995) Alcohol policy and the public good. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21.
FarrellS.ManningW. G. & FinchM. D. (2003) Alcohol dependence and the price of alcoholic beverages. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 117–147.
22.
FlanaganG. (2003) Sobering result: The Alberta liquor retailing industry ten years after privatization. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and Parkland Institute.
23.
FreemanD. G. (2000) Alternative panel estimates of alcohol demand, taxation, and the business cycle. Southern Economic Journal, 67, 325–344.
24.
GiesbrechtN. (2000) Roles of commercial interests in alcohol policies: Recent developments in North America. Addiction, 95, Supplement 4, S581–S595.
25.
GiesbrechtN. & GreenfieldT. K. (1999) Public opinions on alcohol policy issues: A comparison of American and Canadian surveys. Addiction, 94, 521–531.
26.
GreenfieldT. K.YeY. & GiesbrechtN. (2006) Alcohol public opinion in the US over a 15-year period of dynamic per capita consumption changes: Implications for today's public health practice. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
27.
GrossmanM. (2004) Individual behavior and substance use: The role of price. NBER working paper no. 10948. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28.
GrossmanM.ChaloupkaF. J.SafferH. & LaixuthaiA. (1994) Effects of alcohol price policy on youth: A summary of economic research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4(2), 347–364.
29.
GruenewaldP. J.PonickiW. R.HolderH. D. & RomelsjöA. (2006) Alcohol prices, beverage quality, and the demand for alcohol: Quality substitutions and price elasticities. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30, 96–105.
30.
Gyimah-BrempongK. (2001) Alcohol availability and crime: Evidence from census tract data. Southern Economic Journal, 68, 2–21.
31.
HolderH. D.AndréassonS.NorströmT.ÖsterbergE. & RossowI. (2006) Forecasting future alcohol problems associated with Swedish alcohol policy. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
32.
HopeA. (2006) Alcohol policy in Ireland: Is practice following the evidence? Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
33.
House of Commons (2007) Public Accounts—Thirteenth Report, London, United Kingdom.
34.
KanburR. & KeenM. (1993) Jeux sans frontières: Tax competition and tax coordination when jurisdictions differ in size. American Economic Review, 83(4), 877–892.
35.
KerrW. C. & YeY. (2006) Per capita alcohol, cigarette and soda consumption and cancers of the lip, oral cavity and pharynx, esophagus, larynx and stomach in the US from 1950 to 2002. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
36.
KoskelaE. & SchöbR. (1999) Alleviating unemployment: The case for green tax reforms. European Economic Review, 43, 1723–1746.
37.
LayardR. (2003) Happiness: Has social science a clue? Paper presented at the Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures 2002–2003, London School of Economics, March 3–5.
38.
Lopez-GarciaM. A. (1998) On welfare and revenue effects of indirect tax harmonization. Economics Letters, 60, 185–193.
39.
MarkowitzS. (2000) An economic analysis of alcohol, drugs, and violent crime in the National Crime Victimization Survey. NBER working paper no. 7982. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
40.
MidanikL. T.ChaloupkaF. J.SaitzR.ToomeyT. (2004) Alcohol-attributable deaths and years of potential life lost: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(23), 2831–2832.
41.
MidfordR.YoungD.PlayfordD.KiteE.ChikritzhsT. & PascalR. (2006) An evaluation of liquor licensing restrictions in the Western Australian community of Port Hedland. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
42.
MurrayR. P. (2006) Population level cohort studies on alcohol and health harm: What we know and what we don't know. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
43.
ParkerR. N.LutherK. & FaresL. (2006) Availability, gang violence and alcohol policy: Gaining support for alcohol regulation via harm reduction strategies. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
44.
NelsonI. & YoungD. (2001) Do advertising bans work? An international comparison. International Journal of Advertising, 20, 273–296.
45.
NorströmT. (2006) Unemployment, alcohol and all-cause mortality in the US, 1950–2002. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
46.
SafferH. & GrossmanM. (1987) Beer taxes, the legal drinking age, and youth motor vehicle fatalities. Journal of Legal Studies, 16(2), 351–374.
47.
SahaT. D. & GrantB. F. (2006) US State socio-economic conditions, state alcohol policy and individual alcohol use and alcohol use disorders: A multi-level analysis. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
48.
SawkaE.LiepoldH.LockhartN.SongS. & ThomasG. (2006) Reducing alcohol-related harm in Canada: Toward a culture of moderation. Synopsis of a proposed national alcohol strategy. Paper presented at the Kettil Bruun Society Thematic Symposium “Population-Level Studies of Alcohol Consumption and Harm,” Toronto, Ontario, October 1–5.
49.
SelvanathanS. & SelvanathanE. (2005) The demand for alcohol, tobacco and marijuana. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
50.
ShahA. (1996) On the design of economic constitutions. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'economique, 29(2), S614–S618.
51.
SinnH.-W. (1990) Tax harmonization and tax competition in Europe. European Economic Review, 34, 489–504.
52.
StafströmM. (2007) Consequences of an increase in availability due to an eroded national policy on alcohol: A study of changes in consumption patterns and experienced alcohol-related harm among 17–18-year-olds in southern Sweden, 2003–2005. Contemporary Drug Problems, 34(4), 575–588.
53.
TieboutC.M. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
54.
Troncoso-ValverdeC. (2004) Preference shifts, structural breaks and the domestic demand for Chilean wine. Revista de economia e sociologia rural, 42, 487–506.
55.
VarianH. (2006) Intermediate microeconomics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
56.
VerdonckM. (2004) A note on Kanbur and Keen: Transfers to sustain fiscal cooperation. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=779086.
57.
WangY. Q. (1999) Commodity taxes under fiscal competition: Stackelberg equilibrium and optimality. American Economic Review, 89(4), 974–981.
58.
WattG. M. C. & NaiduM. (2002) Noble experiment II: Selective prohibition. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 3–5.
59.
WilsonJ. D. (1999) Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52, 269–304.
60.
YamadaT.KendixM. & YamadaT. (1993) The impact of alcohol consumption and marijuana use on high school graduation. NBER working paper no. W4497. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
