Creating interaction opportunities between people of different ages can reduce ageism and increase solidarity. However, spatial age segregation persists due to a lack of age-inclusive public spaces. We explored factors motivating older adults to seek/avoid contact with younger adults in regular neighborhood coffeeshops primarily frequented by younger customers. Semi-structured interviews in Study 1 (N = 12) revealed that older adults perceived age-related exclusivity in “young” spaces like coffeeshops, were hindered from visiting by metastereotypes and discrimination, but were motivated by perceived learning opportunities. Studies 2 (N = 107) and 3 (N = 218) employed questionnaires and tracked coffee vouchers, showing that participants with stronger learning goals and more positive metastereotypes showed greater intention to seek contact. However, only the higher-powered Study 3 revealed the importance of frequent intergenerational contact and learning goals for initiating contact in real-life. The discussion highlights implications for creating more age-inclusive spaces to foster intergenerational interaction.
AbramsD.EllerA.BryantJ. (2006). An age apart: The effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.691
2.
Al RamiahA.SchmidK.HewstoneM.FloeC. (2015). Why are all the White (Asian) kids sitting together in the cafeteria? Resegregation and the role of intergroup attributions and norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 100–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12064
3.
AndersonC.HildrethJ. A. D.HowlandL. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781
4.
AsbrockF. (2010). Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000011
5.
BarberS. J. (2017). An examination of age-based stereotype threat about cognitive decline: Implications for stereotype-threat research and theory development. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 62–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616656345
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
7.
BettencourtL.DixonJ.CastroP. (2019). Understanding how and why spatial segregation endures: A systematic review of recent research on intergroup relations at a micro-ecological scale. Social Psychological Bulletin, 14(2), e33482. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.v14i2.33482
8.
BousfieldC.HutchisonP. (2010). Contact, anxiety, and young people’s attitudes and behavioral intentions towards the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 36(6), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270903324362
9.
BreckB. M.DennisC. B.LeedahlS. N. (2018). Implementing reverse mentoring to address social isolation among older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61(5), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1448030
10.
CadieuxJ.ChasteenA. L.PackerD. J. (2019). Intergenerational contact predicts attitudes toward older adults through inclusion of the outgroup in the self. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(4), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx176
11.
CortellesiG.KernanM. (2016). Together old and young: How informal contact between young children and older people can lead to intergenerational solidarity. Studia Paedagogica, 21(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2016-2-7
12.
CuddyA. J. C.NortonM. I.FiskeS. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x
13.
DarnonC.DompnierB.Marijn PoortvlietP. (2012). Achievement goals in educational contexts: A social psychology perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00457.x
14.
De Paula SieverdingT.MertenM.KastnerK. (2023). Old for young: Cross-national examination of intergenerational political solidarity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27, 1233–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231201785
15.
DixonJ.TredouxC.DaviesG.HuckJ.HockingB.SturgeonB.WhyattD.JarmanN.BryanD. (2020). Parallel lives: Intergroup contact, threat, and the segregation of everyday activity spaces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000191
DruryL.AbramsD.SwiftH. J. (2017). Making Intergenerational Connections – an Evidence Review. 75.
18.
DruryL.HutchisonP.AbramsD. (2016). Direct and extended intergenerational contact and young people’s attitudes towards older adults. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(3), 522–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12146
19.
DweckC. S. (1986). Motivational Processes Affecting Learning. American Psychologist.
20.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
FaselN.VauclairC.-M.LimaM. L.AbramsD. (2021). The relative importance of personal beliefs, meta-stereotypes and societal stereotypes of age for the wellbeing of older people. Ageing and Society, 41(12), 2768–2791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000537
23.
FinkelsteinL. M.RyanK. M.KingE. B. (2013). What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based metastereotypes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(6), 633–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.673279
24.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
25.
FowlerC.GasiorekJ. (2020). Implications of metastereotypes for attitudes toward intergenerational contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217744032
26.
GrantH.DweckC. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
27.
GreenD. J.WoutD. A.MurphyM. C. (2021). Learning goals mitigate identity threat for Black individuals in threatening interracial interactions. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000331
Holland, C., & Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2007). Social interactions in urban public places. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
31.
KauffM.BenedaM.PaoliniS.BilewiczM.KotzurP.O’DonnellA. W.StevensonC.WagnerU.ChristO. (2021). How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12398
32.
KleinO.AzziA. E. (2001). The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes: How group members attempt to tailor an out-group’s representation of themselves. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164759
33.
KuballT.PollmannsC.AsbrockF.JahnG. (2023). Older adults’ stereotypes of and attitudes toward younger adults and intergenerational contact frequency. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 22, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2023.2223196
LammersJ.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2008). Looking through the eyes of the powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.015
36.
LamontR. A.SwiftH. J.AbramsD. (2015). A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging, 30(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038586
37.
LemmerG.WagnerU. (2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2079
LongY.JiangX.WangY.ZhouX.YouX. (2022). You Are Old, but Are You Out? Intergenerational Contact Impacts on Out-Group Perspective-Taking and on the Roles of Stereotyping and Intergroup Anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 781072. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.781072
40.
MacInnisC. C.HodsonG. (2012). ‘Where the rubber hits the road’ en route to inter-group harmony: Examining contact intentions and contact behaviour under meta-stereotype threat. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02014.x
41.
MacInnisC. C.Page-GouldE. (2015). How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568482
42.
MannionG. (2016). Intergenerational education and learning: We are in a new place. In PunchS.VanderbeckR.SkeltonT. (Eds.), Families, intergenerationality, and peer group relations (pp. 1–21). Springer Singapore.
43.
MeshelD. S.MCGlynnR. P. (2004). Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educational Gerontology, 30(6), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270490445078
44.
MigachevaK.TroppL. R. (2013). Learning orientation as a predictor of positive intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(4), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212455854
45.
MurphyM. C.RichesonJ. A.MoldenD. C. (2011). Leveraging motivational mindsets to foster positive interracial interactions: Motivation and interracial interactions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00338.x
46.
NarushimaM.LiuJ.DiestelkampN. (2018). Lifelong learning in active ageing discourse: Its conserving effect on wellbeing, health and vulnerability. Ageing and Society, 38(4), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16001136
47.
NgS. H.LiuJ. H.WeatherallA.LoongC. S. E. (1997). Younger adults’ communication experiences and contact with elders and peers. Human Communication Research, 24(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00588.x
48.
PaoliniS.AzamF.HarwoodJ.MackiewiczM.HewstoneM. (2022). Seeking and avoiding contact with Muslims at a Hijab Stall: Evidence for multilayer, multi-determined solidarity, courage, apathy, and moral outrage. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(1), 214–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12477
49.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.HewstoneM.NeumannD. L. (2018). Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(12), e12422. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12422
50.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
51.
SheeranP. (2002). Intention–behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
52.
SheeranP.WebbT. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12265
53.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2006). Interracial interactions: A relational approach. In Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 121–181). Elsevier.
54.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A.VorauerJ. D. (2006). Threatened identities and interethnic interactions. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 321–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601095240
55.
StephanW. G. (2014). Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314530518
56.
SwiftH. J.BarberS. J.LamontR. A.WeissD.ChasteenA. L. (2021). Editorial: Age-based stereotype threat effects on performance outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 773615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773615
57.
TaylorV. J.YantisC.BonamC.HartA. (2021). What to do? Predicting coping strategies following ingroup members’ stereotypical behaviors in interracial interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(7), 1084–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220960269
58.
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309345850
59.
TurnerR. N.HodsonG.DhontK. (2020). The role of individual differences in understanding and enhancing intergroup contact. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(6), https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12533
60.
UhlenbergP.De Jong GierveldJ. (2004). Age-segregation in later life: An examination of personal networks. Ageing and Society, 24(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0300151X
61.
VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. https://www.maxqda.com/
62.
VezzaliL. (2017). Valence matters: Positive meta-stereotypes and interethnic interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1208140
63.
VorauerJ. D. (2006). An information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction. Psychological Review, 113(4), 862–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.862
64.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
65.
VoylesE.FinkelsteinL.KingE. (2014). A tale of two theories: Stereotype threat and metastereotypes. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12171
WoodcockA.HernandezP. R.EstradaM.SchultzP. W. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029120
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
