This article presents the results of a survey questionnaire developed to ascertain which of three constituent groups (Superiors, Peers, and Subordinates) in the workplace has the greatest influence on rater compliance with employee performance appraisal guidelines. The research found that superiors had the greatest influence on rater compliance with rating procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrettB.V.KernanM.C.. “Performance Appraisal and Terminations: A Review of Court Decisions Since Brito v. Zia With Implications for Personnel Practices.” Personnel Psychology40, no.3 (Autumn 1987): 489–503.
2.
BernardinH. J.BeattyR.W.. Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work. Boston: Kent Publishing Company, 1984.
3.
BernardinH.J.OrbanJ.A.CarlyleJ.J.. “Performance Ratings as a Function of Trust in Appraisal, Purpose for Appraisal, and Rater Individual Differences.” Proceeding of the Academy of Management (1981): 311–315.
4.
BernardinH.J.KlimoskiR.J.. “Performance Appraisal.” In Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings, ed. LockeE.A., 43–62. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986.
5.
CascioW.F.Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profit.3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.
6.
ClevelandJ.N.MurphyK.R.WilliamsR.E.. “Multiple Uses of Performance Appraisal: Prevalence and Correlates.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, no. 1 (1989): 130–135.
7.
CummingsL.L.“A Field Experimental Study of the Effects of Two Performance Appraisal Systems.”Personnel Psychology, 26, no. 4 (1973): 489–502.
8.
FerrisG.R.JudgeT.A.. Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1991.
9.
GardnerW.L.MartinkoM.J.. “Impression Management in Organizations.” Journal of Management14, no. 2 (1988): 321–338.
10.
HarrisM.M.“Rater Motivation in the Performance Appraisal Context: A Theoretical Framework.”Journal of Management20, no. 4 (Winter 1994): 737–756.
11.
KaneJ.S.FreemanK.A.. “MBO and Performance Appraisal: A Mixture is not the Solution, Part 2.” Personnel64, no. 2 (1987): 26–32.
12.
KlimoskiR.J.InksL.. “Accountability Forces in Performance Appraisal.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45 (1990): 194–208.
13.
LandyF.J.FarrJ.L.. The Measurement of Work Performance: Methods, Theory and Applications.New York: Academic Press, 1983.
