Leadership is an ill-defined complex construct, difficult if not impossible to measure in assessment centers. Current research is cited to support this view. Using work samples and measuring how well the work is accomplished is suggested as a way to avoid the problems associated with assessment of leadership and other constructs. The proposed process gets directly to the candidate's job qualifications. It avoids the problems of construct validation and classification of behaviors into interrelated and complex constructs such as leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassBernard M.StogdillRalph M.. 1981. Handbook of leadership, a survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
2.
BennisWarren. 1989. On becoming a leader. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
3.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, The Civil Service Commission, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Justice. 1978. Uniform guidelines on employment selection procedures. 29 CFR 1607 et seq (1979).
4.
GatewoodRobertThorntonGeorge C.IIIHenneseyH. W.Jr.1990. Reliability of exercise ratings in the leaderless group discussion. Journal of Occupational Psychology63: 331–42.
5.
GrahamCole B.HaysSteven W.. 1993. Managing the public organization.2nd ed.Washington: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
6.
GulickLuther H.UrwickLyndall F., eds. 1937. Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
7.
HowardAnn. 1993. Some troubling paradigms for the assessment of leadership. A paper presented to the 21st International Congress on the Assessment Center Method, Atlanta, GA.
8.
RobertsonIvanGrattonLyndaSharpleyDavid. 1987. The psychometric properties and design of managerial assessment centres: Dimensions into exercises won't go. Journal of Occupational Psychology60: 187–195.
9.
SackettPaul R.DreherGeorge F.. 1982. Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings. Journal of Applied Psychology67: 401–10.
10.
ShoreTed H.ThorntonGeorge C.IIIShoreMcFarlane L.. 1990. Construct validity of two categories of assessment center dimension ratings. Personnel Psychology43: 101–16.
11.
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc.1987. Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures. 3d ed. College Park, MD: Author.
12.
Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. 1989. Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Public Personnel Management18: 457–470.
13.
Task Force on Assessment Center Standards. 1980. Standards and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. The Personnel Administrator (February): 35–38.
14.
WillihanganzMichael A.LanganShelley A., eds. 1993. Job analysis manual. Prepared by Western Region Intergovernmental Personnel Assessment Council (WRIPAC), Sacramento, CA.
