This article discusses how to improve the validity and reliability of structured interviews. A framework for the structured interview is suggested. The framework is based on the foundations laid by various researchers, as well as the guidelines for assessment centers. The proposed framework was used to structure an interview used in a selection test. The results suggest that this kind of structured interview may be a valid and less costly alternative to the assessment center. Additional research to refine and build on the framework is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArveyR. D.CampionJ. E.1982. The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology35: 281–323.
2.
CampionM. A.PursellE. D.BrownB. K.1988. Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology41: 25–42.
3.
DanielC.ValenciaS.1991. Structured interviewing simplified. Public Personnel Management20: 127–134.
4.
tDipboyeR. L.1992. Selection interviews: Process perspectives.Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing Co.
5.
EderR. W.1989. Contextual effects oninterview decisions. In The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice, ed. EderRobert W.FerrisGerald R., 113–126. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice.1978. Adoption by four agencies of uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register43: 38290–38315.
7.
FeildH. S.GatewoodR. D.1989. Contextual effects on interview decisions. In The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice, ed. EderRobert W.FerrisGerald R., 145–57. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
FitzgeraldL.F.QuaintanceM. K.1982. Survey of assessment center use in state and local government. Journal of Assessment Center Technology5: 9–21.
9.
GauglerB. D.RosenthalD. B.ThorntonG. C.IIIBentsonC.1987. Meta-Analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology72: 493–511.
10.
HinrichsJ. R.1969. Comparison of “real life” assessments of management potential with situational exercises, paper-and- pencil ability tests, and personality inventories. Journal of Applied Psychology53: 596–601.
11.
JoinerD.1991. Assessment centers and job simulation exercises: Professional and ethical issues. P(ersonnel) T(esting) Council)/S(outhern) C(alifornia), 3, no. 11, November, 1991.
12.
LathamG. P.SariL. M.PursellE.D.CampionM. A.1980. The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology65: 422–427.
13.
LowryP. E.1991. The assessment center: Reducing interassessor influence. Public Personnel Management20 (Spring): 19–26.
14.
LowryP. E.1992. The assessment center: Effects of varying consensus procedures. Public Personnel Management21 (Summer): 171–183.
15.
ReillyR.R.HenryS.SmitherJ.W.1990. An examination of the effects of using behavior checklists on the construct validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology43: 71–84.
Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc.1987. Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures3d ed.College Park, MD: Author.
18.
Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines1989. Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Public Personnel Management18: 457–470.
19.
ThorntonC.G.IIIByhamW. C.1982. Assessment centers and managerial performance.New York: Academic Press.
20.
ThortonG.C.1992. Assessment centers in human resource management.Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
21.
TinsleyH. E. A.WeissD. J.1975. Inter-rater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology22: 358–376.
22.
WiesnerW. H.CronshawS. F.1988. A meta-analytic investigation of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology61: 275–290.
23.
WrightP. M.LichtenfelsP. A.PursellE. D.1989. The structured interview: Additional studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology62: 191–99.
24.
YeagerSamuel J.1986. Use of assessment centers by metropolitan fire departments in North America. Public Personnel Management15 (Spring): 51–64.
