Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper identifies two contemporary issues within the context of selection and staffing for police and firefighting positions: (1) there is increasing litigation challenging the validity of physical ability tests in screening applicants for these positions, and (2) there is not much published literature concerning the use of and validation of physical ability tests in these settings. The paper discusses issues and challenges associated with court challenges of traditional content validity procedures and suggests there may be an over-reliance on this particular validation strategy. It is suggested that construct validation procedures may be an alternative procedure to provide evidence concerning the validity of physical ability tests within these contexts. Construct validation is described and illustrated via hypothetical examples.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arvey

R.D.

Faley

R.H.

(1989). Fairness in Selecting Employees. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Bell

(December, 1987). Where does physical testing leave women? Management Review, 47–50.

Binning

J.F.

Barrett

G.V.

(1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478–494.

Campion

M.A.

(1983). Personnel selection for physically demanding jobs: Review and recommendations. Personnel Psychology, 36, 527–550.

Collingwood

T.R.

(April, 1988). Implementing programs and standards for law enforcement physical fitness. The Police Chief, 20–24.

Dothard v. Rawlingson, 15 FEP 11 (1977).

Fleishman

E.A.

(1988). Some new frontiers in personnel selection research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 679–697.

Griggs v. Duke Power, 3 FEP 175 (1971).

Guion

R.M.

(1978). Scoring of content domain samples: The problem of fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 499–506.

10.

Hogan

Quigley

A.M.

(1986). Physical standards for employment and the courts. American Psychologist, 41, 1193–1217.

11.

Landy

F.J.

(1986). Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. American Psychologist, 41, 1183–1192.

12.

Maher

P.T.

(1984). Police physical ability tests: Can they ever be valid? Public Personnel Management Journal, 173–183.

13.

Nunnally

J.C.

(1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (1987). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures: (Third Edition, College Park, MD: Author.

15.

Spurlin

Doolittle

T.L.

Daniel

(1989). Research strategies for the development of physical ability standards. Paper presented at 1989 annual convention of IPMAAC, Orlando, Florida.

16.

State of Minnesota v. City of St. Paul, State of Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings for the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. 8-1700-3224-2. (1990).

17.

Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 1978, 43 Fed. Reg., 38290–38315.

18.

Vance

R.J.

Coovert

M.D.

MacCallum

R.C.

Hedge

J.W.

(1989). Construct models of task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 447–455.

19.

Watson v. Fort Worth Bank and Trust, 108 S. Cat. 2777 (1988).

20.

Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio, 109 S. Cat. 2115 (1989).

Validation Strategies for Physical Ability Testing in Police and Fire Settings

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References